Author |
Topic: Easy: Stupid (Read 6849 times) |
|
James G
Guest
|
Ok, at each of those listed is an end (or a beginning, but that's a kind of end). Of course, actually each _is_ an end (or a beginning), but by _being_ an end (or beginning), and being located (in space and/or time as appropriate) in the same place as it is itself located (as things generally are), each is where it is at (so to speak). However I think there may be some problems with the question. I guess it's probably ok to use "at" to inspecifically refer to space and/or time, if this is necessary? (I've used "end" this way in my answer.) However the concepts of the beginning of eternity and the end of time are not compatible (if they refer to the same universe in the same way). And I would suggest that an end has location but not substance, so isn't the kind of thing that can have a beginning (or at least if it does, then the beginning of the end and the end of the end are the same thing, namely the original end). And perhaps a place may have more than one end? Of course, you change it into a little puzzle about the letter "e", if you added quotation marks around those phrases, but that would just be... well, stupid.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
AFamiliarFace
Guest
|
Sillly me missed the obvious answer. I thought it was talking about an edge.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
James G
Guest
|
Yes, "edge" might be a better word than "end". I considered "edge" to refer exclusively to space, but electronics engineers use it to refer to time in relation to electronic signals, I guess that is what you were thinking of.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jeffrey Mayer
Guest
|
You are thinking WAY too hard. The answer is in the question itself. It's the letter "e" beginning of e ternity the end of tim e and spac e and so on.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
wakiza33
Junior Member
industrial Engineer // Berkeley Alumnus
Posts: 54
|
|
Re: Easy: Stupid
« Reply #4 on: Sep 12th, 2014, 8:29am » |
Quote Modify
|
Clever one.
|
|
IP Logged |
Binder Jetting Engineer
|
|
|
|