wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - complex analysis »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 24th, 2024, 2:21pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   general
   complex analysis
(Moderators: ThudnBlunder, Grimbal, towr, Icarus, william wu, Eigenray, SMQ)
   complex analysis
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: complex analysis  (Read 3120 times)
Bo
Guest

Email

complex analysis  
« on: Apr 9th, 2004, 5:45am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

Dear Respected Sir:  
 
Could please have a look at this question:
 
If the complex function g(z) has an isolated singularity at z, then the  
function exp(g(z))does not have a pole at z. (given hint: f has a pole of  
order n at z, then f'/f has a simple pole with residue -n)
 
Thanks a lot.  
 
Bo
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: complex analysis  
« Reply #1 on: Apr 9th, 2004, 3:25pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Let f(z) = exp(g(z)), and apply the result in your hint.
 
The result you get is the contrapositive of the question.
« Last Edit: Apr 9th, 2004, 3:27pm by Icarus » IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Moon
Guest

Email

Re: complex analysis  
« Reply #2 on: Apr 14th, 2004, 9:54pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

Is my solution of this problem correct ?
 
Suppose that f has a pole at z0 of order n, then f'/f=g' has a simple pole at z0 of order -n, i.e. g'(z)=-n*(z-z0)-1 +a0+a1*(z-z0)+...
1) If g(z) has a removable singularity at z0, then g(z)=a0+a1*(z-z0)+..., hence g'(z)=a1+a2(z-z0)+...
So we have that g(z) doesn't have removable singularity at z0.
2) If g(z) has a essential singularity then g(z)= [sum]-[infty]+[infty]an(z-z0), and we have that g'(z)=...+a-1(z-z0)-2+a1+a2   (z - z0)+...
So g'(z) doesn't have an essential singularity.
3) If g(z) has a pole at z0, then g(z)=a-1(z-z0)-1+a0+a1(z-z 0)+... so that g'(z)=-a-1(z-z0)-2+a1+a2(z-z 0).
 
Hence all type of singularities contradicts to condition that g'(z) has a simple pole with residue -n. Hence f(z) doesn't have pole at z0.
 
Correct me please if I did something wrong.
Thank you.
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: complex analysis  
« Reply #3 on: Apr 15th, 2004, 4:09pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

That is it.
 
If g has a singularity, then g' cannot have a simple pole, and so exp(g(z)) cannot have any pole.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board