wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - One-to-one function »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 23rd, 2024, 5:17pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   general
   complex analysis
(Moderators: Grimbal, Eigenray, william wu, Icarus, ThudnBlunder, SMQ, towr)
   One-to-one function
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: One-to-one function  (Read 6410 times)
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
One-to-one function  
« on: Jan 31st, 2006, 9:19am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Let D be the open unit disk and f one-to-one such that f: D -> C and f(z) + f(-z) = 0.  
Show that there is a function g: D -> C that is also one-to-one such that f(z) = sqrt(g(z^2)).
 
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: One-to-one function  
« Reply #1 on: Jan 31st, 2006, 3:19pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

That is obvious. Did you want us to prove that g is analytic on D as well, or that there exists a single analytic branch of sqrt for which the formula holds?
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: One-to-one function  
« Reply #2 on: Jan 31st, 2006, 3:27pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Ha ha, no. It was meant to accompany the other one-to-one function problem given by cain to get a dialog going. Proceed if you must, however.
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: One-to-one function  
« Reply #3 on: Jan 31st, 2006, 4:04pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Alright, I'll bite.
 
Define g(z2) = f2(z). Since f(-z) = -f(z), we have f2(z) = f2(-z), so g is well-defined. Since every element of D has a square root also in D, g is defined on all of D.
 
If g(z2) = g(w2), then f2(z) = f2(w), and f(z) = +/- f(w) = f(+/-w). Since f is injective, z = +/- w. Therefore z2 = w2. So g is injective as well.
 
Note that this also works when f is even.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: One-to-one function  
« Reply #4 on: Jan 31st, 2006, 7:08pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jan 31st, 2006, 4:04pm, Icarus wrote:
Note that this also works when f is even.

Yes, but there aren't many even functions injective on D.
 
Note also that if f is analytic, then g will be also.  For, if
f2(z) = a0 + a1z2 + a2z4 + . . .
is analytic on D, then limsup an1/n < 1, so
g(z) := a0 + a1z + a2z2 + . . .
is also analytic on D.
 
But more interesting is the converse: If g : D -> C is an injective analytic function with g(0)=0, then there exists an injective analytic f : D -> C with f2(z) = g(z2).
For, the function g(z)/z is analytic and (since g is injective) it has no zeros in D.  Thus it has an analytic square root, say
h2(z) = g(z)/z,
and it suffices to check
f(z) := zh(z2) ( = sqrt[g(z2)] )
is injective.  Suppose f(z)=f(w).  Squaring, we have g(z2)=g(w2), so by injectivity of g, z= +/- w.  But as f is clearly odd, f(-z)=f(z) implies f(z)=0, which implies z=0, again by injectivity of g.  Thus z=w.
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: One-to-one function  
« Reply #5 on: Feb 1st, 2006, 10:31am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Showing that g is holomorphic is not difficult - try finish up.
 
The form with square roots is (when f is the identity function) at variance with the fact that there is no holomorphic  
square root of the identity function in D, and zz covers D. What I mean is that there is no holomorphic (or even continuous) function  
s in D such that s(zz)=z for all z in D.
 
I think this is not the converse but the same problem with the notation reversed (roles of f and g interchanged), unless, of course, I am thinking about a different problem.
 
For the reason I've indicated above, I prefer to refrain from writing sgrt(g(z^2)) (although I didn't when I stated the problem but of course it is part of the problem)  
and verbalizing "the square root of g(z^2)", and be content to write f^2(z) = g(z^2).  
 
This function f does what's wanted; but one would not want to misleadingly suggest existence of continuous square-root extractions.
« Last Edit: Feb 2nd, 2006, 1:02am by Michael Dagg » IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board