|
||
Title: crescent-shaped region mapping Post by trusure on Apr 21st, 2009, 7:29am how I can construct a conformal map from the region between the circles D(1,1) and D(2,2) to D(0,1)??? If I just pick some points on the boundary of D(2,2), I'll end up mapping D(2,2) onto D(0,1), which is not what I want. I'm not sure how you do this. The Riemann mapping theorem doesn't apply because the region I'm trying to map to D(0,1) isn't simply connected. I don't think an LFT can work either, because an LFT will have to take the boundary of D(0,1) to the boundary of the original region-- that's impossible because the boundary isn't connected. So, this is my PROBLEM ... Thanks in advance |
||
Title: Re: crescent-shaped region mapping Post by Obob on Apr 21st, 2009, 7:52am Actually that region is simply connected. The point 0 does not lie in the region, so there is no loop in the region which goes around the hole. The boundary is also connected; its two circles meeting at a point, and it can be parameterized by a single curve. As far as actually constructing the mapping, I'm terrible at these things. I have a table of important types of conformal maps that I use to try and transform one region into the other. You won't find a single linear fractional transformation that does the trick; however, you might be able to first apply a LFT that simplifies the region, then compose it with other things to get to a disk. |
||
Title: Re: crescent-shaped region mapping Post by trusure on Apr 21st, 2009, 8:26am Thank you... but I didn't get the IDEA ..?!!! Could anyone suggest something ??? |
||
Title: Re: crescent-shaped region mapping Post by Eigenray on Apr 21st, 2009, 8:37pm There is an FLT taking your region to { z : |z| > 1, Re z < 1 }. If the conformal map doesn't have to be injective, you can just square and invert. But otherwise, I dunno. There is a variation of Schwarz-Christoffel for circular-arc polygons (for example, in [link=http://books.google.com/books?id=k5KU6clCKssC&pg=PA70&vq=circular-arc+polygons]this book[/link]) but it looks like it's given as a differential equation. I would expect there to be something more explicit in this case though. On second thought, it's actually pretty simple : just invert and you get a strip! |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |