Author |
Topic: two condoms, three women (Read 13228 times) |
|
wayne
Guest
|
How about this. For the first woman, wear both condoms. Take the outter one off, and use the inner condom for the second woman. For the third woman, take the outter condom, turn it inside out, put it back over the inner condom. or.. how about just go to the damn store and buy some more
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Rajiv Eranki
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #1 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 12:00am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
That's exactly what I thought....
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
William
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #2 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 12:11am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
You don't need to wear both condoms for the first woman. How about this... First Woman: Condom A Second Woman: Condom B Thrird Woman: Condom B with condom A inside out over condom B
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Justin
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #3 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 12:15am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
But then he's exposing himself to the first woman's fluids...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Kenny
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #4 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 12:16am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Interesting. While that might be the correct answer to the riddle, in real life that method would not work to ward off the chance of an STD. When you "double bag" it causes friction between the condoms and increases the chance of breakage.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
William
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #5 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 12:28am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
In response to justin.... he is not exposing himself to the first woman's fluids....he is wearing condom B, and then over top of it he puts on condom a which he has turned inside out... It does introduce the problem that if HE has an STD...it could be transmitted to the third woman...in which case the first solution is better, but the riddle simply states that no disease should be transfered between the women or to himself...it says nothing about him transmitting a disease to the women....
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Cowardly Bastard
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #6 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 12:35am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
What kind of sexaul activity is being implied? Vaginal only? The man could take a chance and use condom A with Woman A, have oral sex with Woman B (she would only go down on him because of the low occurance of saliva carrying STIs, and she would not ingest any of his ejaculate), and then use condom B on Woman C. Just a thought.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
wayne
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #7 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 12:36am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
incorrect. It states ".. while ensuring that no STD is passed from one woman (or possibly himself) to another (or to himself)." I believe this includes the transmission of an STD from himself to any of the woman. on Jul 24th, 2002, 12:28am, William wrote:In response to justin.... it says nothing about him transmitting a disease to the women.... |
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
johnP
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #8 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 1:21am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Wayne is right on this one. The man has to wear the same condom all the time. Look at the two condoms as having a total of four exposure-sides. One of the sides of condom A is exposed to the man's fluids all the time, leaving three exposure-sides for the women. Wear condom B over condom A for the first woman, then remove condom B for the second woman. Turn condom B inside out and put it back on condom A for woman three. Buying more condoms would be safer and easier though, I agree there
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Eric
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #9 on: Jul 24th, 2002, 11:48pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Don't you guys remember 9th grade health class? This problem has no solution since a condom cannot guar that not std will not be passed. hehe I thought about the while 'flip the condom' stuff but there is alway one person that gets contaminated. How about he washes off one of the condoms since we aren't paying attention to sex ed anyway?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Eric
Newbie
Posts: 1
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #10 on: Jul 25th, 2002, 12:05am » |
Quote Modify
|
Actually, I guess if we ignore seepage, the solution is probably: -use 2 condoms with 1st -take off top condom and use bottom condom on 2nd -turn the removed top condom inside-out and put it on over the bottom condom for 3rd
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Malinger
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #11 on: Jul 25th, 2002, 8:44am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Well , here at work after quite a lot of arguments we proved the following : Given n condoms , you can "do" 2n-1 women , without getting infected , or infecting other girls. The reason is simple - you put n condoms. each time you are done you remove one ,and keep it aside until you are left with only one which you don't remove , hence n girls. Then you put each one of the used condoms reversed , do your thing , and throw it away - n-1. This way we proved = n+n-1 = 2n - 1 girls. P.s - Yes I know , we should have something better to do with our time..
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Doug
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #12 on: Jul 25th, 2002, 6:45pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
What about a hand job? It's a form of sex, and carries almost no risk of infection... it's certainly safer than a condom. - Doug
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
Gender:
Posts: 1291
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #13 on: Jul 26th, 2002, 4:36pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 25th, 2002, 8:44am, Malinger wrote:Well , here at work after quite a lot of arguments we proved the following : Given n condoms , you can "do" 2n-1 women , without getting infected , or infecting other girls. The reason is simple - you put n condoms. each time you are done you remove one ,and keep it aside until you are left with only one which you don't remove , hence n girls. Then you put each one of the used condoms reversed , do your thing , and throw it away - n-1. This way we proved = n+n-1 = 2n - 1 girls. P.s - Yes I know , we should have something better to do with our time.. |
| lol ... you guys are too funny
|
|
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
Peter Seebach
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #14 on: Jul 26th, 2002, 6:23pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
It seems to me that the correct answer is that the hypothetical guy is going to die of syphillis, leaving a number of bastard children behind him, if he thinks this will work.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Ion Rush
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #15 on: Jul 27th, 2002, 3:13am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
no no no you guys are all wrong the correct answer is e, its impossible to tell from the information given theirfor, to solve this riddle you need to apply for a governmnent grant and begin feild testing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
James G
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #16 on: Jul 31st, 2002, 6:50pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Wow, 1791 reads. This is obviously a question that is relevant to a great many people. I can solve Willy Wutang's problem by giving him one of my condoms. I have 6. I have had them for about 2 years, and they are nearing their use-by date.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Neil
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #17 on: Aug 2nd, 2002, 9:23am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
I figured it out!!! And willy doesn't have to get all goey in the process. He *simply* has a threesome with the first two women, and then has the last one all to himself. Lucky willy.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Orius Khan
Guest
|
|
Re: 2n-1 women for n condoms...
« Reply #18 on: Aug 31st, 2002, 12:22am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Yeah, in theory, that is the correct solution (wearing multiples and then taking one off each time). But can you imagine actually functioning with 25 condoms on?? He might as well use a baseball bat, cause that's how thick your new concoction would be. And then wearing the same one the entire time? You'd have a giant pinata balloon right quick! hehe ----- [There are no 'Z's in my email address.]
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jeremy
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #19 on: Aug 31st, 2002, 10:59am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
well you wouldn't have to weat all 25 condoms, you could wear one base condom, and then just wear one of the other 24, and after every "sessoin" switch only the outside condom. the purpose of wearing multiple condoms is to make sure your penis doesn't touch the inside of the condom that is making contact with the female. it's kind of pointless to have on 23 extra condoms.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
shiv
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #20 on: Sep 11th, 2002, 1:50pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
almost fell down laughing over this one. good lateral thinking! on Jul 24th, 2002, 12:35am, Cowardly Bastard wrote:What kind of sexaul activity is being implied? Vaginal only? The man could take a chance and use condom A with Woman A, have oral sex with Woman B (she would only go down on him because of the low occurance of saliva carrying STIs, and she would not ingest any of his ejaculate), and then use condom B on Woman C. Just a thought. |
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
josh
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #21 on: Nov 27th, 2002, 4:01am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
what if he just gets head from all 3??
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
morphius
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #22 on: Nov 27th, 2002, 4:08am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
what if he just gets head from all 3??
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
blackfalcon1210
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #23 on: Dec 2nd, 2002, 12:54am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
on Jul 27th, 2002, 3:13am, Ion Rush wrote:no no no you guys are all wrong the correct answer is e, its impossible to tell from the information given theirfor, to solve this riddle you need to apply for a governmnent grant and begin feild testing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| im up for this idea.. nothing better then feild testing.. as long as no stds are really involved...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Patient of Dr. Whitey
Guest
|
|
Re: two condoms, three women
« Reply #24 on: Dec 2nd, 2002, 11:26pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Mallinger wrote: "Given n condoms , you can "do" 2n-1 women , without getting infected , or infecting other girls" There is a method to actually GREATLY increase the amount of women you can "do". I have discussed the details of this solution with my doctor. See, all you really need is one condom for any amount of women. You simply must achieve vaginal necrosis for each woman. Dead cells cannot be infected. It is, however, possible for the dead cells to still be carrying disease, therefor it is of UTMOST IMPORTANCE to keep the condom on, and pray like h*ll that it doesnt break. So assuming you have one condom, you could "do" even 1000 post mortem women, therefor disproving Mallinger's equation.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|