wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Quadratic divisibility »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 19th, 2024, 1:26am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   easy
(Moderators: SMQ, towr, Icarus, Eigenray, Grimbal, ThudnBlunder, william wu)
   Quadratic divisibility
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Quadratic divisibility  (Read 448 times)
NickH
Senior Riddler
****





   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 341
Quadratic divisibility  
« on: Jun 13th, 2003, 12:08pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Show that, if n is an integer, n2 + 11n + 2 is not divisible by 12769.
IP Logged

Nick's Mathematical Puzzles
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Quadratic divisibility  
« Reply #1 on: Jun 13th, 2003, 4:31pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

:Not very elegant, I know:
 
Assume n2 + 11n + 2 = 12769k = 1132k for some positive integer k
 
Solving for n, we get D2 = (113)[1 + 4*(113k)2]
 
The first term (113) is prime  
and the 2nd term is one more than a pefect square.
 
Therefore D2 cannot be a perfect square.  
Hence, n cannot be an integer.
:
« Last Edit: Jun 14th, 2003, 2:49am by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Quadratic divisibility  
« Reply #2 on: Jun 14th, 2003, 5:28am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

T&B, I found the disciminant to be 113+4*1132k?
 
Knowing NickH's problems, there's going to be some ingenious lateral step required. Here are my rambings so far...
 
By defining f(n)=n2+11n+2, it is clear that f(n) will always be even and it is possible to show that f(n)==+/-1 mod 3; that is, f(n) is a and not a multiple of 3.
 
Transferring this to the RHS, 12769k, we determine that k must be of the form 6a+2 or 6a-2 if a solution exists.
 
However, I've not been able to take this any further. Anybody got any other ideas?
« Last Edit: Jun 14th, 2003, 10:30am by Sir Col » IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Quadratic divisibility  
« Reply #3 on: Jun 14th, 2003, 9:30am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Quote:
T&B, I found the disciminant to be 17+4*1132k?

Duh. Yes, trying again I get 113*(1 + 4*113) = (113)(3)(151)
As these 3 numbers are all prime, D2 cannot be a perfect square.
 
But, as you say, this is surely not the expected method.
 
IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Quadratic divisibility  
« Reply #4 on: Jun 14th, 2003, 10:40am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I just realised that I made a typo in my discriminant: I wrote 17 rather than 113?!  Huh
 
I think you forgot k this time T&B.
 
However, as the discriminant is 113(1+4*113k), we can see that the second factor is one more than a multiple of 113; that is, we can write it as 113(113t+1). Clearly this cannot be square, as the second factor cannot contain a factor of 113.
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Quadratic divisibility  
« Reply #5 on: Jun 14th, 2003, 11:41am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Quote:
I think you forgot k this time T&B.

Man, we are making hard work of this.  Embarassed  
 
Quote:
Clearly this cannot be square, as the second factor cannot contain a factor of 113.

I guess you mean '113 as a factor'.
 
« Last Edit: Jun 14th, 2003, 2:07pm by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
NickH
Senior Riddler
****





   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 341
Re: Quadratic divisibility  
« Reply #6 on: Jun 22nd, 2003, 8:43am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Consider n2 + 11n + 2 = (n + 62)2 - 113(n + 34).
 
If n2 + 11n + 2 is divisible by 1132, it must be divisible by 113, and so (n + 62) must be divisible by 113.  But then (n + 62)2 is divisible by 1132 while 113(n + 34) is not!
 
IP Logged

Nick's Mathematical Puzzles
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board