wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Trig Problem »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 18th, 2024, 5:17pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   easy
(Moderators: Eigenray, Icarus, towr, william wu, SMQ, ThudnBlunder, Grimbal)
   Trig Problem
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Trig Problem  (Read 3977 times)
warriors837
Guest

Email

Trig Problem   trig9.gif
« on: May 26th, 2009, 11:20am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

A twenty foot ladder leans up against a perpendicular wall and just touches the outer top edge of a 6'x6'x6' cube packing case pushed up close to the wall. How far up the wall is the top of the ladder?
 
« Last Edit: May 26th, 2009, 11:46am by warriors837 » IP Logged

towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Trig Problem  
« Reply #1 on: May 26th, 2009, 12:01pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Let's call the length from the cube to the foot of the ladder a, then the height h, is (6+a) * 6/a, and we have the further constraint that h2+(6+a)2 = 202.
I think that should be enough.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
pex
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 880
Re: Trig Problem  
« Reply #2 on: May 26th, 2009, 2:31pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on May 26th, 2009, 12:01pm, towr wrote:
Let's call the length from the cube to the foot of the ladder a, then the height h, is (6+a) * 6/a, and we have the further constraint that h2+(6+a)2 = 202.
I think that should be enough.

Yes it is, but I think the solution outlined here (with different numbers) is aesthetically preferable. (Although it uses the same general ideas.)
IP Logged
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Trig Problem  
« Reply #3 on: May 26th, 2009, 8:32pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

See also
 
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=riddles_eas y;action=display;num=1216424120;
 
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=riddles_med ium;action=display;num=1216427247;
IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Wiles_euler
Guest

Email

Re: Trig Problem   proof.doc
« Reply #4 on: May 28th, 2009, 4:02pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

Work and answers in attachment
« Last Edit: May 29th, 2009, 7:44am by warriors837 » IP Logged
pex
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 880
Re: Trig Problem  
« Reply #5 on: May 29th, 2009, 12:26am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on May 28th, 2009, 4:02pm, Wiles_euler wrote:
Full proof in attachment...

I wouldn't call that a full proof... What it's basically saying is, we have h = (6+a)*6/a and h2+(6+a)2=202, so let's numerically solve ((6+a)*6/a)2+(6+a)2=202.
 
Have you considered reading ThudanBlunder's and my links?
 
Edit: Besides, why would you go through all the simplification if you're going to solve the equation numerically anyway? 202=h2+[6+(36/(h-6)]2 isn't really any harder for a numerical solver than 400=(h4-12h3+72h2)/(h2-12h+36)...
« Last Edit: May 29th, 2009, 12:31am by pex » IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Trig Problem  
« Reply #6 on: May 29th, 2009, 12:33am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It's not only not a full proof, but I'm fairly sure the answers aren't even quite correct (even besides the fact they're both approximations). They're not very far off, but still too far to be accurate. Just put them back into the equation, you won't get 400, but 401 and 413.
« Last Edit: May 29th, 2009, 12:38am by towr » IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Wiles_euler
Guest

Email

Re: Trig Problem  
« Reply #7 on: May 29th, 2009, 7:45am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

When you plug in the given values from the attachment, they do work out with the us of the Pythagorean theorem.
« Last Edit: May 29th, 2009, 7:46am by warriors837 » IP Logged
Ronno
Junior Member
**






   


Gender: male
Posts: 140
Re: Trig Problem  
« Reply #8 on: May 29th, 2009, 8:45pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I don't think that statement makes any sense and the correct values are around 9.040515497 and 17.84009752.
IP Logged

Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it..
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Trig Problem  
« Reply #9 on: May 30th, 2009, 2:14am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on May 29th, 2009, 8:45pm, Ronno wrote:
I don't think that statement makes any sense and the correct values are around 9.040515497 and 17.84009752.
Yup, that's what I get.
Or to be exact: 3 + (109) +/- (82 - 6 (109))
 
But hey, it's his homework; so by all means he should go with his own results Wink
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board