wu :: forums - Print Page


    
      
        wu :: forums
        (http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi)
      

        riddles >> easy >> two condoms, three women
        
(Message started by: wayne on Jul 23^rd, 2002, 11:27pm)

Title: two condoms, three women
Post by wayne on Jul 23^rd, 2002, 11:27pm

How about this. For the first woman, wear both condoms. Take the outter one off, and use the inner condom for the second woman. For the third woman, take the outter condom, turn it inside out, put it back over the inner condom.

or.. how about just go to the damn store and buy some more ;-)

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Rajiv Eranki on Jul 24^th, 2002, 12:00am

That's exactly what I thought.... ;)

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by William on Jul 24^th, 2002, 12:11am

You don't need to wear both condoms for the first woman.
How about this...

First Woman: Condom A
Second Woman: Condom B
Thrird Woman: Condom B with condom A inside out over condom B

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Justin on Jul 24^th, 2002, 12:15am

But then he's exposing himself to the first woman's fluids...

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Kenny on Jul 24^th, 2002, 12:16am

Interesting. While that might be the correct answer to the riddle, in real life that method would not work to ward off the chance of an STD. When you "double bag" it causes friction between the condoms and increases the chance of breakage.

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by William on Jul 24^th, 2002, 12:28am

In response to justin....

he is not exposing himself to the first woman's fluids....he is wearing condom B, and then over top of it he puts on condom a which he has turned inside out...

It does introduce the problem that if HE has an STD...it could be transmitted to the third woman...in which case the first solution is better, but the riddle simply states that no disease should be transfered between the women or to himself...it says nothing about him transmitting a disease to the women....

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Cowardly Bastard on Jul 24^th, 2002, 12:35am

What kind of sexaul activity is being implied? Vaginal only?

The man could take a chance and use condom A with Woman A, have oral sex with Woman B (she would only go down on him because of the low occurance of saliva carrying STIs, and she would not ingest any of his ejaculate), and then use condom B on Woman C.

Just a thought.

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by wayne on Jul 24^th, 2002, 12:36am

incorrect. It states ".. while ensuring that no STD is passed from one woman (or possibly himself) to another (or to himself)." I believe this includes the transmission of an STD from himself to any of the woman.

on 07/24/02 at 00:28:01, William wrote:

In response to justin....

it says nothing about him transmitting a disease to the women....

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by johnP on Jul 24^th, 2002, 1:21am

Wayne is right on this one. The man has to wear the same condom all the time. Look at the two condoms as having a total of four exposure-sides. One of the sides of condom A is exposed to the man's fluids all the time, leaving three exposure-sides for the women. Wear condom B over condom A for the first woman, then remove condom B for the second woman. Turn condom B inside out and put it back on condom A for woman three. Buying more condoms would be safer and easier though, I agree there ;)

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Eric on Jul 24^th, 2002, 11:48pm

Don't you guys remember 9th grade health class? This problem has no solution since a condom cannot guar that not std will not be passed. hehe

I thought about the while 'flip the condom' stuff but there is alway one person that gets contaminated. How about he washes off one of the condoms since we aren't paying attention to sex ed anyway?

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Eric on Jul 25^th, 2002, 12:05am

Actually, I guess if we ignore seepage, the solution is probably:

-use 2 condoms with 1st
-take off top condom and use bottom condom on 2nd
-turn the removed top condom inside-out and put it on
over the bottom condom for 3rd

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Malinger on Jul 25^th, 2002, 8:44am

Well , here at work after quite a lot of arguments we proved the following :
Given n condoms , you can "do" 2n-1 women , without getting infected , or infecting other girls.
The reason is simple - you put n condoms. each time you are done you remove one ,and keep it aside until you are left with only one which you don't remove , hence n girls.
Then you put each one of the used condoms reversed , do your thing , and throw it away - n-1.
This way we proved = n+n-1 = 2n - 1 girls.

P.s - Yes I know , we should have something better to do with our time.. :)

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Doug on Jul 25^th, 2002, 6:45pm

What about a hand job? It's a form of sex, and carries almost no risk of infection... it's certainly safer than a condom.

- Doug

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by william wu on Jul 26^th, 2002, 4:36pm

on 07/25/02 at 08:44:22, Malinger wrote:

lol ... you guys are too funny :D

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Peter Seebach on Jul 26^th, 2002, 6:23pm

It seems to me that the correct answer is that the hypothetical guy is going to die of syphillis, leaving a number of bastard children behind him, if he thinks this will work.

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Ion Rush on Jul 27^th, 2002, 3:13am

no no no

you guys are all wrong

the correct answer is e, its impossible to tell from the information given theirfor, to solve this riddle you need to apply for a governmnent grant and begin feild testing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by James G on Jul 31^st, 2002, 6:50pm

Wow, 1791 reads. This is obviously a question that is relevant to a great many people.
I can solve Willy Wutang's problem by giving him one of my condoms. I have 6. I have had them for about 2 years, and they are nearing their use-by date.

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Neil on Aug 2^nd, 2002, 9:23am

I figured it out!!! And willy doesn't have to get all goey in the process. He *simply* has a threesome with the first two women, and then has the last one all to himself. Lucky willy.

Title: Re: 2n-1 women for n condoms...
Post by Orius Khan on Aug 31^st, 2002, 12:22am

Yeah, in theory, that is the correct solution (wearing multiples and then taking one off each time). But can you imagine actually functioning with 25 condoms on?? He might as well use a baseball bat, cause that's how thick your new concoction would be. And then wearing the same one the entire time? You'd have a giant pinata balloon right quick! hehe :o

-----
[There are no 'Z's in my email address.]

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Jeremy on Aug 31^st, 2002, 10:59am

well you wouldn't have to weat all 25 condoms, you could wear one base condom, and then just wear one of the other 24, and after every "sessoin" switch only the outside condom. the purpose of wearing multiple condoms is to make sure your penis doesn't touch the inside of the condom that is making contact with the female. it's kind of pointless to have on 23 extra condoms.

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by shiv on Sep 11^th, 2002, 1:50pm

almost fell down laughing over this one.

good lateral thinking!

on 07/24/02 at 00:35:44, Cowardly Bastard wrote:

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by josh on Nov 27^th, 2002, 4:01am

what if he just gets head from all 3?? :o

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by morphius on Nov 27^th, 2002, 4:08am

what if he just gets head from all 3?? :o

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by blackfalcon1210 on Dec 2^nd, 2002, 12:54am

on 07/27/02 at 03:13:21, Ion Rush wrote:

im up for this idea.. nothing better then feild testing.. as long as no stds are really involved...

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Patient of Dr. Whitey on Dec 2^nd, 2002, 11:26pm

Mallinger wrote:
"Given n condoms , you can "do" 2n-1 women , without getting infected , or infecting other girls"
There is a method to actually GREATLY increase the amount of women you can "do".
I have discussed the details of this solution with my doctor.
See, all you really need is one condom for any amount of women. You simply must achieve vaginal necrosis for each woman. Dead cells cannot be infected. It is, however, possible for the dead cells to still be carrying disease, therefor it is of UTMOST IMPORTANCE to keep the condom on, and pray like h*ll that it doesnt break. So assuming you have one condom, you could "do" even 1000 post mortem women, therefor disproving Mallinger's equation.

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by jon_G on Dec 3^rd, 2002, 5:54pm

Abstinance. Willy needs to stay away from those hoes. I almost died when I read about the 25 condoms and the baseball bat. He needs to apply at Trojan for a job as a tester and a problem solver. ;D

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by usdragonfly on Jan 31^st, 2004, 10:44pm

:o i was amazed at how many people have actually read this!!

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by John_Gaughan on Feb 2^nd, 2004, 6:04am

on 01/31/04 at 22:44:23, usdragonfly wrote:

:o i was amazed at how many people have actually read this!!

I was amazed with the eagerness and innovation people had to come up with answers, like it was a matter of life and death.

Of course, that may be the explanation...

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by usdragonfly on Feb 2^nd, 2004, 6:09am

i know!! i would almost say some of these people h :Pave treid these things!!!!

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by usdragonfly on Feb 2^nd, 2004, 6:14am

wow my spelling was really messed up on that one!!!! ;D I better slow down from now on!!! ::)

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by usdragonfly on Feb 2^nd, 2004, 6:47am

THIS IS JUST TO TRY OUT MY NEW SIGNATURE! SOME OF THE SPELLING IS MESSED UP BUT THAT WAS THE ONLY WAY I COULD FIT IT ALL ON THERE

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by towr on Feb 2^nd, 2004, 9:17am

There's really no need to post to try out your new signature, as all your old posts are updated with the new signature as soon as you've changed it..

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Noke_Lieu on Feb 19^th, 2004, 9:29pm

variations on a theme...
(everyone has something the others don't want to catch)

Getting them undressed, Willy is shocked to discover that one of the ladies is in fact a fella, Wally.
So, now there are two guys, two girls. And still only two condoms. But Willy and Wally want both the ladies.

What's the game plan now?

Or 3 guys, one girl. (Willy, Wally and Wooly?)

Just before kick off, another willing participant (m or f) joins in, with their own condom. What now?

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by John_Gaughan on Feb 20^th, 2004, 5:58am

on 02/19/04 at 21:29:53, Noke_Lieu wrote:

Getting them undressed, Willy is shocked to discover that one of the ladies is in fact a fella, Wally.

This is not the kind of party that I want to be at, where there are crossdressers. My solution is to put my pants back on, turn around, and leave. :-)

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Reaper on Apr 13^th, 2004, 8:53pm

just so u know, if 2 condoms are worn together friction breaks them :-[

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by Noke Lieu on Apr 13^th, 2004, 9:14pm

oh yes....
But this question is from a Maths Class, not Sex Ed.

Its (i guess) a responsible act to point this out, just in case there is any git lucky enough to be in a position to try.

If you want, you can change the 3 horny, diseased women to buckets of paint that you don't want to get on your sensitive skin. And change the condoms to large rubber gloves.
Not so interesting any more? That's right- sex sells.

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by John_Gaughan on Apr 15^th, 2004, 6:36am

What if Willy's friends are not necessarily diseased, but instead have a probability of being diseased. For example, each woman has a 5% chance of being infected, and if she is, a 50% chance of passing the infection. After all, condoms are not perfect. They do not cover the entire... "surface area"... and depending on the girl there may be plenty of fluid to cause "collateral damage."

Anyway, given an ample supply n of condoms and n women, how many women can Willy spend some quality time with before the overall risk of infection goes above 0.15?

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by evergreena3 on Apr 15^th, 2004, 12:12pm

Something I feel obligated to point out, but I hate to do so...

If I'm having sex with a woman, I usually "finish," be it in a condom or not (oh, how I love being married!).
If I have 2 condoms and 3 women, it does not matter what I do...only 2 women possibly get "serviced" by me, in that fashion.
If you wear both condoms at once, and you finish, how can you just wear the bottom condom again? I mean, isn't it full?

And if not, then what is the point?

EverGreenA3

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by rmsgrey on Apr 19^th, 2004, 5:31am

And you can't rinse it out?

More impressive is still being up for a third round...

Title: Re: two condoms, three women
Post by grimbal on Apr 22^nd, 2004, 3:06pm

By the way, with 2 condoms 2 guys can do 2 women (or the other way round). How many condoms are necessary for 3 men to do 3 women? For 4 men and 4 women?