wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Can srn347 be considered a spammer? »
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 25th, 2024, 1:26am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   general problem-solving / chatting / whatever (Moderators: towr, ThudnBlunder, Grimbal, william wu, SMQ, Icarus, Eigenray)
   Can srn347 be considered a spammer?		 « Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  (Read 9259 times)
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #25 on: Sep 8th, 2007, 9:48pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Not the day I registered. If most people did it, why blame me?! Let's solve this with a riddle. Why is there no correct answer to this question?
IP Logged
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
*****



A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.

   


Gender: male
 Posts: 1105
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #26 on: Sep 8th, 2007, 9:51pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
on Sep 8th, 2007, 9:48pm, srn347 wrote:
Not the day I registered. If most people did it, why blame me?! Let's solve this with a riddle. Why is there no correct answer to this question?

 
A riddle is not a pardox, you should know yourself, you did start a stupid thread. Here is your details according to my timezone when I look at you:
 
Username: srn347  Picture/Text  
 
Name:  srn347  
Posts:  252  
Position:  Full Member  
Date Registered:  Aug 27th, 2007, 12:52pm  
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------
 
ICQ:  
AIM:    
YIM:    
Email:  hidden  
Website:    
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------
 
Gender:  Male  
Age:    
Location:  
 
So you did register then. But since your not in my timezone and no one else is currently open to being so except for Noke, the 26th.
« Last Edit: Sep 9th, 2007, 6:07am by mikedagr8 » IP Logged
"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #27 on: Sep 8th, 2007, 9:54pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Mine says the 26th. And that wasn't a paradox.
IP Logged
SMQ
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
 Posts: 2084
Re: srn347 is not a spammer!  
« Reply #28 on: Sep 9th, 2007, 5:11am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
on Sep 8th, 2007, 9:42pm, mikedagr8 wrote:
Sure, I seem to be doing a lot of that recently(not making a positive contribution), but not in the same way you are.

Since we're having this public discussion... Mike, while I appreciate your enthusiasm 'round here, I'm not sure your replying to every single post srn347 makes with a correcting comment, however deserved, is helping anything.  Clearly by now he knows what he's doing, and just as clearly he doesn't care.  Only he knows why that is, but if it's to get attention/recognition/notoriety, you're only "egging him on."
 
Which is in no way to say you're doing anything "wrong" -- everyone is welcome to post as much or as little as they like, so long as they keep it civil (though "constructive" is preferred) -- but I fail to see what purpose is served in "hounding" him the way you seem to be doing.  Just my opinion; make of it what you will.
 
--SMQ
IP Logged
--SMQ
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
*****



A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.

   


Gender: male
 Posts: 1105
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #29 on: Sep 9th, 2007, 5:18am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Understood, sorry, it just frustrates me, that after being able to finally use the internet for recreation, I see that people can be so ignorant, when they have such a wonderful opportunity to grasp knowledge. Knowledge = Power when money isn't involved. So I try to gain as much of that as possible. Sorry, if I am enticing someone to have a go at me, just I am not used to such ignorance, by someone who looks like they are capable of understanding.
IP Logged
"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #30 on: Sep 9th, 2007, 10:05am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
knowledge=power when money isn't involved? Why can't money be involved?
IP Logged
Roy42
Senior Riddler
****






    ddhilltop2


Gender: male
 Posts: 418
Re: srn347 is not a spammer!  
« Reply #31 on: Sep 11th, 2007, 12:29am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
on Sep 9th, 2007, 5:11am, SMQ wrote:

Clearly by now he knows what he's doing, and just as clearly he doesn't care.  Only he knows why that is, but if it's to get attention/recognition/notoriety, you're only "egging him on."
--SMQ

 
I'd say it's to gain uberpuzzler status; doing what he's been doing means an extra 50 posts or so, then he gets to reply to threads like this, forcing some of us to tell him off repeatedly, then he replies again! I mean he registered on August 27 and is already a senior riddler, not many people actually respect people with higher status, and at this rate no one will respect srn347 even if he stays on long enough to be uberpuzzler
« Last Edit: Sep 11th, 2007, 12:47am by Roy42 » IP Logged
Regards,

≈Roy42
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #32 on: Sep 11th, 2007, 4:32pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Clearly the reason you don't respect me is because none of you respect each other or yourselves. If you people had a theme song, this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFTw5hmQbdQ
would be it since I'm waiting for you all to stop haiting.
IP Logged
TenaliRaman
Uberpuzzler
*****



I am no special. I am only passionately curious.

   


Gender: male
 Posts: 1001
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #33 on: Sep 11th, 2007, 7:24pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Funnily enough, after eliminating all his posts from my sight, i find the replies made to his posts more annoying now.
 
A sincere request to all, "please stop feeding the troll".
 
This is for 2 good reasons,
1. The person you are trying to help doesn't want to be helped.
2. You are not contributing anything to the thread.
 
For example, check the exponential inequality thread. Out of the 38 posts (1+37) at the moment, 14 posts are crap and roughly 18 posts are replies to that crap, making the contribution to original thread just 6 and this includes the post which has the question.
 
-- AI
IP Logged
Self discovery comes when a man measures himself against an obstacle - Antoine de Saint Exupery
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #34 on: Sep 11th, 2007, 8:09pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
What is wrong with you people?! If you think at least one thing I say is spam, you must have coral in your brain. This may be slightly exagerated. What is wrong with you people?! If you think at least one thing I say is spam, you must have coral in your brain. This may be slightly exagerated. What is wrong with you people?! If you think at least one thing I say is spam, you must have coral in your brain. This may be slightly exagerated. What is wrong with you people?! If you think at least one thing I say is spam, you must have coral in your brain. This may be slightly exagerated.
« Last Edit: Sep 11th, 2007, 8:40pm by srn437 » IP Logged
ima1trkpny
Senior Riddler
****



"Double click on 'Yes'... Hey!"

   


Gender: female
 Posts: 452
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #35 on: Sep 11th, 2007, 10:40pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
on Sep 11th, 2007, 7:24pm, TenaliRaman wrote:

A sincere request to all, "please stop feeding the troll".

Fair enough... sorry for being a contributer to your irritation. Lucky ducky, I can't remove the posts from my sight >.< so forgive me my momentary lapse of control... I felt like slapping him for his silly behavior and the posts were the only way I could display my displeasure with him... but I see your point and will endeavor to comply.
IP Logged
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." -Churchill
Roy42
Senior Riddler
****






    ddhilltop2


Gender: male
 Posts: 418
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #36 on: Sep 12th, 2007, 4:56am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
on Sep 11th, 2007, 4:32pm, srn347 wrote:
Clearly the reason you don't respect me is because none of you respect each other or yourselves.

 
No, i respect those who don't try to tear others down like that.
All i did in that post was make a comment based on the observations of your posts and you insulted me and everyone else on these forums.
 
Going about things in that manner isn't going to earn many other peoples respect. If you reply to this, i would appreciate it if you would at least make it neutral instead of negative: at least let us know why you have been doing all of this.
 
Sorry for "feeding the troll" TenaliRaman, but  I'm still doing my best to not make my posts one sided against srn347
IP Logged
Regards,

≈Roy42
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #37 on: Sep 12th, 2007, 8:31pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
I don't insult people unless insulted first. :)
FYI, I usually don't do that symbol thing, so tell me if I did it wrong.
« Last Edit: Sep 12th, 2007, 8:32pm by srn437 » IP Logged
Roy42
Senior Riddler
****






    ddhilltop2


Gender: male
 Posts: 418
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #38 on: Sep 13th, 2007, 8:00pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Was it my first post or someone elses in this thread, because i don't think i've insulted you yet, except for the no one respecting you, but to actually contribute something to this thread, no, srn347 wouldn't be considered a spammer, more of an (sorry srn) annoyance, at least that's what you are to me.
 
The smiley was correct, Smiley
IP Logged
Regards,

≈Roy42
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer? No!  
« Reply #39 on: Sep 13th, 2007, 9:02pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Well, although I still don't see myself as an annoyance either, at least it's better than spammer.
IP Logged
Ghost Sniper
Senior Riddler
****



Do not hide. It is useless.

   


Gender: male
 Posts: 599
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #40 on: Sep 14th, 2007, 5:06am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
I see an odd resemblance between srn and cowsRus, if you guys still remember him.
IP Logged
*sob* I miss my mommy... *blows nose* huh, I'm on? oh right.

(thinks to self) Time for my speech to these college kids.

"Reason is more important than all emotions..."
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #41 on: Sep 14th, 2007, 4:56pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Who is cowsRus? By the way, you forgot the 347.
IP Logged
Obob
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
 Posts: 489
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #42 on: Sep 14th, 2007, 5:33pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
CowsRus showed up around here maybe a year or so ago, and conducted himself in a manner that didn't benefit the boards.  Although in retrospect, he wasn't that bad.  We all know better now.
IP Logged
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #43 on: Sep 14th, 2007, 7:18pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
What happened to him after that?
IP Logged
Obob
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
 Posts: 489
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #44 on: Sep 14th, 2007, 9:46pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
He got bored and left, presumably.
IP Logged
Aurora
Junior Member
**





   


Gender: female
 Posts: 81
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #45 on: Sep 15th, 2007, 3:43am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
on Sep 14th, 2007, 9:46pm, Obob wrote:
He got bored and left, presumably.

I wouldn't count on it...
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=what_am_i;a ction=display;num=1188440718
IP Logged
"In these days, a man who says a thing cannot be done is quite apt to be interrupted by some idiot doing it."- Elbert Green Hubbard
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
 Posts: 1261
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #46 on: Sep 16th, 2007, 9:59pm »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
I think TR and others have suggested starvation!! I think we all need to do our part to bring hunger to that little part of the world!! I have been guilty of fueling the fire, not any more!!
IP Logged
"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
JiNbOtAk
Uberpuzzler
*****




Hana Hana No Mi

   


Gender: male
 Posts: 1187
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #47 on: Sep 17th, 2007, 12:10am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
on Sep 16th, 2007, 9:59pm, Sameer wrote:
I have been guilty of fueling the fire, not any more!!

Agreed Sameer !! So, let's totally ignore the troll with profound odasity, and let's converse meaningful stuffs.  Grin
 
So, anyone else in the world is fasting right now, or am I just the only one ?
IP Logged
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
*****



A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.

   


Gender: male
 Posts: 1105
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #48 on: Sep 17th, 2007, 1:53am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
Quote:
So, anyone else in the world is fasting right now, or am I just the only one ?

Next Saturday I know that several million people will be fasting, so if you can wait that long....
« Last Edit: Sep 17th, 2007, 1:53am by mikedagr8 » IP Logged
"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
 Posts: 2276
Re: Can srn347 be considered a spammer?  
« Reply #49 on: Sep 17th, 2007, 4:33am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
on Sep 17th, 2007, 1:53am, mikedagr8 wrote:
Next Saturday I know that several million people will be fasting

Many more people are fasting these days.
« Last Edit: Sep 17th, 2007, 4:33am by Barukh » IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board