wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - A proposal for reducing ignorance »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 3rd, 2024, 6:02pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   general problem-solving / chatting / whatever
(Moderators: william wu, Grimbal, Eigenray, SMQ, towr, ThudnBlunder, Icarus)
   A proposal for reducing ignorance
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: A proposal for reducing ignorance  (Read 1906 times)
amichail
Senior Riddler
****





   


Posts: 450
Re: A proposal for reducing ignorance  
« Reply #25 on: Jun 16th, 2009, 12:36pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jun 16th, 2009, 12:16pm, towr wrote:
Well, the way it usually works is that people are aware of these flaws, and spot them in others, but not in themselves.
What you really want is not an IQ test, but a test to measure how critical people are of their own idea vs the ideas of others. And as the article shows, IQ may very well be inversely correlated with that. (And certainly the smarter people think they are, the less critical they generally are of themselves.)  
I'm not sure how you'd construct such a test though.

It's not important what the test is called.
 
You could always score people in a way that rewards a combination of things, even if some subset of those things tend not to be strong in combination in many people.
 
With education, I believe that smart people can learn to identify those flaws you mention in themselves.
« Last Edit: Jun 17th, 2009, 1:23am by amichail » IP Logged

DropZap - a new kind of block elimination game
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: A proposal for reducing ignorance  
« Reply #26 on: Jun 16th, 2009, 12:56pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jun 16th, 2009, 12:36pm, amichail wrote:
It's not important what the test is called.
True, but it is important that it isn't an IQ test; it shouldn't test intelligence because that's not what we want to measure.
 
Quote:
You could always score people in a way that rewards a combination of things, even if some subset of those things tend not to be strong in combination in most people.
There is nothing in IQ tests that tests for this. So it not a matter of scoring an IQ test differently.
 
Quote:
With education, I believe that smart people can learn to identify those flaws you mention in themselves.
Why concentrate only on "smart" people, however you want to define that; anyone that isn't mentally retarded can learn to identify and avoid most of those reasoning flaws.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board