Author |
Topic: find the function (Read 4751 times) |
|
srn437
Newbie
the dark lord rises again....
Posts: 1
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #50 on: Sep 23rd, 2007, 9:13pm » |
Quote Modify
|
copy actually, since cut won't work here. He also gave us an infinite amount of web sites, and out of an infinite amount of web sites, the probability of going to a specific one is zero(positive zero).
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
JiNbOtAk
Uberpuzzler
Hana Hana No Mi
Gender:
Posts: 1187
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #51 on: Sep 23rd, 2007, 10:09pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 23rd, 2007, 9:13pm, srn347 wrote:copy actually, since cut won't work here. He also gave us an infinite amount of web sites, and out of an infinite amount of web sites, the probability of going to a specific one is zero(positive zero). |
| Wow, an infinite amount of websites, really ?
|
|
IP Logged |
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
|
|
srn437
Newbie
the dark lord rises again....
Posts: 1
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #52 on: Sep 23rd, 2007, 10:27pm » |
Quote Modify
|
well, not all at the same time, but more web sites are created each day with no exponential decay, so after an eternity there will be. It is already seemingly infinite and going to be infinite. If you count search result pages, there are infinite since you can search for anything with infinite possibilities.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #53 on: Sep 23rd, 2007, 11:10pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 23rd, 2007, 8:33pm, srn347 wrote:Do you believe that the same God who gave us reason, purpose, and sense wants us to forgo their use? |
| Then why do you never display any sense or reason and does your only purpose seem to be holding on to your obstinate ignorance?
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
amstrad
Newbie
Gender:
Posts: 10
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #54 on: Sep 24th, 2007, 10:02am » |
Quote Modify
|
How about this for f(n): f(n) = ( (n%2)==0 ? -n/2 : 2*n ) if n is even f(n) is -n/2 else f(n) is 2n Still working on g(q)...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
pex
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 880
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #55 on: Sep 24th, 2007, 10:11am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 24th, 2007, 10:02am, amstrad wrote:How about this for f(n): f(n) = ( (n%2)==0 ? -n/2 : 2*n ) if n is even f(n) is -n/2 else f(n) is 2n |
| Then f(f(4)) = 1, not -4...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
amstrad
Newbie
Gender:
Posts: 10
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #56 on: Sep 24th, 2007, 12:53pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 24th, 2007, 10:11am, pex wrote: Then f(f(4)) = 1, not -4... |
| Yep doesn't work. How about this (my coworker's solution, which I think really is correct): hidden: | You need 4 states and a circle process to traverse them: positive even, positive odd, negative even and negative odd. The state transition goes like this: po -> pe -> no -> ne -> po....... f(n) = po: n+1 pe: -n+1 no: n-1 ne: -n-1 |
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
srn437
Newbie
the dark lord rises again....
Posts: 1
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #57 on: Sep 24th, 2007, 7:13pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Assuming zero stays zero since it is neither positive or negative(yet). Anyway, inspired by that answer, here is g. g(q)= integer- q-1+(1/q) not integer- write it in the representation q-1+1/q where q is an integer and get rid of the q-1.
|
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2007, 11:25am by srn437 » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Uberpuzzler
Sorry Goose, it's time to buzz a tower.
Gender:
Posts: 1672
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #58 on: Sep 24th, 2007, 8:20pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 23rd, 2007, 8:33pm, srn347 wrote:Do you believe that the same God who gave us reason, purpose, and sense wants us to forgo their use? if you ban me, that's what you'll be doing. |
| Another religious concept: I'm done with this sh*t.
|
|
IP Logged |
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." - Galileo Galilei
|
|
|
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.
Gender:
Posts: 1105
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #59 on: Sep 24th, 2007, 8:27pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Good call.
|
|
IP Logged |
"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
|
|
|
amstrad
Newbie
Gender:
Posts: 10
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #60 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 6:46am » |
Quote Modify
|
Here is my solution for g(q): For q to be rational it is n/m for some integers n and m. To mirror my solution for f(n), I make 4 states: 1) n is greater than m and n+m is even (ge) 2) n is greater than m and n+m is odd (go) 3) n is less than m and n+m is even (le) 4) n is less than m and n+m is odd (lo) again the cycle is ge->go->le->lo->ge....... so g(n/m) = if(ge) (n+1)/m if(go) m/(n-1) if(le) n/(m+1) if(lo) (m-1)/n it is important not to reduce your intermediate results starting with 8 (or 8/1) you get 8->1/7->1/8->7->8.... starting with 21/5 you get 21/5->5/20->5/21->20/5->21/5...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7527
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #61 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 7:22am » |
Quote Modify
|
Hm... if you don't simplify your fractions, you are not working with rationals, but with pairs of integers. You can not define a rational function that does 3/6 -> 5/3 2/4 -> 2/5 and 1/2 -> 1/1
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #62 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 7:22am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 25th, 2007, 6:46am, amstrad wrote:it is important not to reduce your intermediate results |
| That's a bit of a flaw then, because fractions keep the same value if you reduce them; they're the same number. There are alternatives that don't have that problem.
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
srn437
Newbie
the dark lord rises again....
Posts: 1
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #63 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 5:00pm » |
Quote Modify
|
A fraction can also have both sides be negative, thus reversing the inequality.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7527
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #64 on: Sep 26th, 2007, 12:40am » |
Quote Modify
|
sure.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
srn437
Newbie
the dark lord rises again....
Posts: 1
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #65 on: Sep 30th, 2007, 9:43pm » |
Quote Modify
|
At least g was solved for.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
RandomSam
Newbie
Gender:
Posts: 20
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #66 on: Oct 4th, 2007, 5:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Based entirely on amstrad's post, how's this for rationals:hidden: | For integers a and b x>1, floor(x) odd : g(x) = x + 1 x>1, floor(x) even: g(x) = (x - 1)-1 x<1, floor(x-1) odd : g(x) = (x-1 + 1)-1 x<1, floor(x-1) even: g(x) = x-1 - 1 |
|
« Last Edit: Oct 4th, 2007, 5:07pm by RandomSam » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #67 on: Oct 5th, 2007, 1:33am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 4th, 2007, 5:05pm, RandomSam wrote:Based entirely on amstrad's post, how's this for rationals:hidden: | For integers a and b x>1, floor(x) odd : g(x) = x + 1 x>1, floor(x) even: g(x) = (x - 1)-1 x<1, floor(x-1) odd : g(x) = (x-1 + 1)-1 x<1, floor(x-1) even: g(x) = x-1 - 1 | |
| Seems fairly good, although you probably want to check for the absolute value of x, and define what to do with 1.
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
RandomSam
Newbie
Gender:
Posts: 20
|
|
Re: find the function
« Reply #68 on: Oct 5th, 2007, 8:22am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 5th, 2007, 1:33am, towr wrote: Seems fairly good, although you probably want to check for the absolute value of x, and define what to do with 1. |
| oops... I meant to say "x is a positive rational" instead of defining a and b as integers, which aren't used in the rest of the solution!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|