Author |
Topic: Transcendental sum? (Read 1074 times) |
|
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948
|
|
Transcendental sum?
« on: Feb 10th, 2006, 9:04pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Evaluate [sum] n5 / (1 + en pi), where the sum is over positive odd n=1,3,5,.... Generalize. Since this is hard, I'll provide a hint right from the start: consider G(z) = [sum] (n + mz)-6, where the sum is over all pairs of integers (n,m) not both zero. Complex numbers are involved, but no complex analysis is necessary if you're willing to accept a result from a related thread.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948
|
|
Re: Transcendental sum?
« Reply #1 on: Dec 19th, 2006, 11:36am » |
Quote Modify
|
Okay, I guess this one was hard, but the answer is pretty amazing, so I'll give it. We have G(z) = [sum] (n+mz)-6 = [sum]n n-6 + 2[sum]m=1oo [sum]n (n+mz)-6, where the first sum counts pairs with m=0, and is just 2Zeta(6), and the other sum takes m and -m together, for m>0. From the other thread, we have [sum] (n+t)-k = (-2pi i)k/(k-1)! [sum]n=1oo nk-1e2pi i nt, and so, changing the order of summation to sum the geometric series, we get G(z) - 2Zeta(6) = 2(-2pi i)6/5! [sum]m,n>0 n5e2pi imnz = C [sum]n n5 e2pi inz/(1-e2pi inz) = -C [sum]n n5/(1-e-2pi inz) = -C A(-2iz), where C = 2(-2pi i)6/5!, and A(x) = [sum]n=1oo n5/(1-epi n x) = [ 2Zeta(6) - G(ix/2) ] / C. Similarly define B(x) = [sum]n=1oo n5/(1+epi n x), so that A(x) + B(x) = [sum] n5 2/(1-e2n pi x) = 2A(2x). Now the sum we are interested in is S = [sum]{n odd} n5/(1+en pi) = B(1) - 32B(2) = [2A(2) - A(1)] - 32[2A(4) - A(2)] = -A(1) + 34A(2) - 64A(4) = 2Zeta(6)/C [-1+34-64] - 1/C [-G(i/2) + 34G(i) - 64G(2i)]. But observe that G(-1/z) = [sum] (n-m/z)-6 = z6 [sum] (-m + nz)-6 = z6 G(z), which gives G(i) = G(-1/i) = i6 G(i) = -G(i), so G(i)=0, and G(i/2) = G(-1/(2i)) = (2i)6 G(2i) = -64 G(2i). Thus in fact S = -31*2Zeta(6)/C = -31[1/42 26 pi6/6!]/[2(-2pi i)6/5!] = 31/504. More generally, if k=4r+1, r>0, then [sum]{n odd} nk/(1+en pi) = (2n-1)Bn+1/[2(n+1)], where Bn is Bernoulli. In particular, this is rational! (This seems to hold for k=1, too, but the proof would require more care, since then G is not absolutely convergent.)
|
« Last Edit: Dec 19th, 2006, 11:40am by Eigenray » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|