|
||
Title: Find The Pairs (X, Y) Post by K Sengupta on Aug 2nd, 2007, 8:01am Analytically determine all pairs of integers (X, Y) with X>=3 and Y>=3 such that there exists infinitely many positive integers Z for which (ZY + Z2 -1) divides : (ZX + Z -1) |
||
Title: Re: Find The Pairs (X, Y) Post by Eigenray on Jun 21st, 2008, 4:41pm Well, this was a fun one! I'll change notation a bit. Let F(x) = xn+x2-1, G(x) = xm+x-1. Suppose F(x) | G(x) for infinitely many integers x. Write G(x) = q(x)F(x) + r(x), where deg r < deg F. Then r(x)/F(x) http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/to.gif 0 as x http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/to.gif http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/infty.gif, and is an integer infinitely often. It follows r http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/equiv.gif 0, so F | G as polynomials. First suppose n is even. If http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif is a root of F, then -http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif is too, and they must both be roots of G. But this means http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gifm = 1-http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif, and (-http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif)m = 1+http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif, which is a contradiction because 1-http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif and 1+http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif are neither the same nor negatives of each other. Now the hard case: n odd. First: Since F' < 0 only for 0 < x < (2/n)1/(n-2), and F(0)<0, F has a unique real root http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif, with 0 < http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif< 1. Let h(t)=t-t2. Since http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gifn+http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif2 = 1, and http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gifn<http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif2, we have h(http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif) < h(http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif2) = h(http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gifn), and therefore http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif2n+http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif-1 < http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gifn+http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif2-1 = 0 = http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gifm+http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/alpha.gif-1. It follows m < 2n. Now, let (1-x)/(1-x2-xn) = 1 - x + x2 + a3x3 + a4x4 + .... Then ak = ak-2 for 1<k<n, and ak = ak-2 + ak-n for k http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/ge.gif n. It's easy to verify that: ak = (-1)k, 0 http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif k < n; an+2i = i, 0 http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif i http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif (n-1)/2; an+2i+1 = -i, 0 http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif i http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif (n-3)/2. Finally, note that G/F must agree with (1-x)/(1-x2-xn) for the first m-1 terms. But G/F is a polynomial of degree m-n. It follows that the n-1 consecutive terms am-n+1,...,am-1 are all 0. But m<2n, and from a0 to a2n-1 the only zeros are an and an+1. Therefore m-n+1=n, m-1=n+1, giving n=3, m=5, and we check that indeed G/F = 1-x+x2. :) |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |