Author |
Topic: Natural Number Challenge (Read 1027 times) |
|
Johno-G
Newbie
Could God create a wall that he could not jump?
Gender: 
Posts: 31
|
 |
Natural Number Challenge
« on: Jan 10th, 2003, 1:51pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
I'm not exactly sure how hard this problem is, as I was simply told how to do this in a lecture. (although I'm sure there must be more than one way...). It involves no actual mathematical working, and is supposed to be just a little bit of creative mathematical thinking!
Please, no spoil-sports letting everyone else in on the solution - make 'em work for it!
Challenge: Construct the set of natural numbers* from nothing. You are not allowed to use addition or multiplication.
* - By the set of natural numbers, I mean {0,1,2,3,...}.
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
Johno-G
Newbie
Could God create a wall that he could not jump?
Gender:
Posts: 31
|
 |
Re: Natural Number Challenge
« Reply #2 on: Jan 10th, 2003, 2:21pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I mean use nothing. Not the number zero, but the concept that there 'is nothing there'. The way I've learned it doesn't actually involve anything other than an abstract concept.
Once you know what this concept is, the rest shouldn't be overly difficult.
I hope that clears things up a little?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Garzahd
Junior Member
Gender:
Posts: 130
|
|
Re: Natural Number Challenge
« Reply #3 on: Jan 10th, 2003, 3:39pm » |
Quote Modify
|
You're not making any sense.
Either give us a clue about this abstract concept, or please lecture us.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Johno-G
Newbie
Could God create a wall that he could not jump?
Gender:
Posts: 31
|
|
Re: Natural Number Challenge
« Reply #4 on: Jan 10th, 2003, 3:45pm » |
Quote Modify
|
OK, sorry if I was a bit vague - I don't think I could've explained it without giving away exactly what you've got to do!
Think about constructing sets of different lengths. See if you can find a way of always creating another (remember - each element in a set must be different) set with exactly one more element in it.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Johno-G
Newbie
Could God create a wall that he could not jump?
Gender:
Posts: 31
|
|
Re: Natural Number Challenge
« Reply #5 on: Jan 10th, 2003, 3:46pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Again, sorry if I'm not making myself too clear, but too much clarity leads to a far too easy problem!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jeremiah Smith
Full Member
Beep!
Posts: 172
|
|
Re: Natural Number Challenge
« Reply #6 on: Jan 10th, 2003, 4:08pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I think he's talking about the abstract way of creating the naturals using sets. Using @ to represent the empty set, since I can't do the circle-with-a-slash:
0 is @
1 is {@}
2 is { @, {@} }, I think.
Each number is the set of all the numbers below it. Or something. I'm taking abstract algebra, next semester, and I'll learn all this fun stuff.
|
| « Last Edit: Jan 10th, 2003, 4:09pm by Jeremiah Smith » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
redPEPPER
Full Member
Posts: 160
|
|
Re: Natural Number Challenge
« Reply #7 on: Jan 10th, 2003, 5:26pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Interesting. Although you started with something: the concept of Ø. It's as much nothing as zero is nothing, only in different fields.
Anyway, this demonstration rings a bell, but I don't remember the specifics. How does that construct the natural numbers? Does it have their properties? Can you add them or something? I can see the cardinal of each set is a natural number. But that involves the concepts of set, cardinality and ... natural numbers!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Johno-G
Newbie
Could God create a wall that he could not jump?
Gender:
Posts: 31
|
|
Re: Natural Number Challenge
« Reply #8 on: Jan 11th, 2003, 1:52am » |
Quote Modify
|
To create the natural numbers, you simply need something that can be quantified, and that can only go up in descrete ammounts. The natural numbers are created by looking at how many elements are in a set. Using Jeremiah's notation of @ to represent {}, the empty set, we get:
@ is a set with 0 elements, giving you something you can quantify as being 'zero',
{ @ } is a set with 1 element,
{ @ , {@} } is a set with 2 elements,
{ @ , {@} , {{@}} } is a set with 3 elements, et cetera.
(think induction here As long as you have a starting point, (the empty set), you can take any set A with n elements, and if you then take A union {A} you will get a set with n+1 elements. Obviously, you can do this ad infinitum, so you have created an infinite number of sets, each of distinct lengths.
On a footnote, I can see your point about having to start with concepts, but I'd regard those as not actually being anything. Zero is a peculiar one, but you can have before you ZERO apples, you can't have zero sets before you, and you can't have any number of sets before you.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: Natural Number Challenge
« Reply #9 on: Jan 12th, 2003, 8:34pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Actually, there are several ways to model the natural numbers. All of them involve a certain amount of mathematical sophistication to do, including the set-theoretic version offered by Jeremiah and Johno himself. (When you get down to it, set theory involves very complex concepts.)
A different approach is the one used by Euclid, who effectively defined Natural numbers (actually all positive real numbers) as equivalence classes of pairs of line segments. This approach, which I am not going to describe here, could be considered less elementary than the set-theoretic one, since geometry requires set theory, but conceptually it is easier in some ways. After all, the Greeks came up with it more than 2000 years before Cantor provided the set-theory version.
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print
