Author |
Topic: Earth rotation (Read 2041 times) |
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender: 
Posts: 1732
|
 |
Earth rotation
« on: Jan 26th, 2003, 4:17am » |
 Quote  Modify
|
This one is not really a riddle. It is, however, interesting...
note: requires a bit of physics
As we all know, the earth completes a rotation every ~24 hours. This rate is decreasing! (that is, it takes longer and longer to complete one "day").
Why is that?
Will the earth stop rotating at some point?
|
|
 IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #1 on: Jan 26th, 2003, 7:11am » |
Quote Modify
|
The moon slows the rotation down, at least that's what I think I've been told, or picked up somewhere..
At some point the earth may stop turning, but there isn't really any way to be sure.. If the moon flies of into space (which could at some point happen since it's moving away from earth, and a large comet/asteroid might one day hit it), then it won't slow down the earths rotation..
On the other hand chances are when the sun burns out there won't be much left of earth, and if earth isn't around it can't turn..
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #2 on: Jan 26th, 2003, 10:42am » |
Quote Modify
|
Close. The slowing mechanism is due to the tides, and is called "tidal braking".
But lets assume the moon will stay in orbit, no comet will hit it (or earth), etc.... Will earth stop rotating?
|
|
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #3 on: Jan 26th, 2003, 11:18am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 26th, 2003, 10:42am, BNC wrote:Close. The slowing mechanism is due to the tides, and is called "tidal braking".
|
|
And what causes those tides?
right.. the moon..
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #4 on: Jan 26th, 2003, 11:29am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 26th, 2003, 11:18am, towr wrote:
And what causes those tides?
right.. the moon..
|
|
And that's why I said.... "close"..... 
Off-course you're right...I'm sorry if I offended you, or if my answer hinted you're wrong. English isn't my native language.
|
| « Last Edit: Jan 26th, 2003, 11:37am by BNC » |
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
Speaker
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1118
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #5 on: Jan 27th, 2003, 12:45am » |
Quote Modify
|
I have heard that the earth is slowing in its rotation due to the redistribution of mass on the surface of the planet. Specifically, that water being held behind dams, at a higher altitude, is further from the axis of rotation and is resulting in a decrease in the speed of rotation.
This is the same principle that causes an ice skater to speed up when he folds his arms across his chest, and to slow down when he extends his arms.
My information, although I cannot indicate a source, described how the degree of deceleration is what might be expected if the estimated mass of the water behind dams were positioned at a distance from the center of the earth equal to its average or mean altitude. And that is coincides with modern development of dams for hydroelectric power.
But, maybe this is an urban legend promulgated by the Oil companies  But, I don't think so.
|
|
IP Logged |
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. <Ben Franklin>
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #6 on: Jan 27th, 2003, 1:04am » |
Quote Modify
|
actually, I think, since most dams aren't on the equator, and thus the water can't flow there (furthest form the axis), it would be relatively closer to the axis, and the earth would speed up..
|
| « Last Edit: Jan 27th, 2003, 1:04am by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #7 on: Jan 27th, 2003, 3:34am » |
Quote Modify
|
Hmm, never heard about the dams influence. Tidal breaking is a "confirmed fact" (as far as these things can be confirmed, or considered facts). Currently the earth slows down at a rate of about 1-2millisecond per century. ~240 million years ago, the day on earth was ~23 hours long -- and that's confirmed by observing fossilized marine animals, such as coral, which show both daily growth rings and annual growth rings). 900 million ago the day may have been as short as 18 hours.
Question remaining: will earth stop eventually?
|
|
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #8 on: Jan 27th, 2003, 5:43am » |
Quote Modify
|
well.. the earth rotation slows down and the moon speeds up. When the angular velocity of the moon around the earth is the same as the earth's angular rotation velocity, then I suppose they would continue at that pace.. (There would also be no tides, since the moon is always at the same side of earth).
On the other hand, the moons angular velocity decreases as it goes faster and get's further away from earth..
Meh.. I dunno.. And I'll be long dead if it were to happen anyway :p
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Chronos
Full Member
 
Gender:
Posts: 288
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #9 on: Jan 27th, 2003, 4:27pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Given enough time, the Earth and Moon would be in a situation like Pluto and Charon, with each locked to the other. So the same face of the Earth would always face the Moon, and vice versa. Since the Moon would still be orbiting the Earth, and hence turning, at this time, the Earth would also still be turning.
In actuality, though, the Sun will die out, and probably take the Earth and Moon both with it, long before this has a chance to happen.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Lythan gany
Guest
|
 hi! how are u?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Yang He
Guest
|
hi! how are u?
I know for a fact that the moon is slowly moving away! Well if you know that the circumference (pardon my spelling) is equal to pie(math term) times d(diameter) anyway the farther it goes away the longer the distance it has to travel around the earth and vola! it takes longer to travel a long distance! If you want to know more just mail me and I would be happy to answer.
Best Regards Yang He,
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Pietro K.C.
Full Member
 
Gender:
Posts: 213
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #12 on: Jan 30th, 2003, 1:48pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Didn't know about the dams either... I would never had thought they had enough mass to be of any effect.
Anyway, I've also heard that the Earth is gaining mass at the rate of about a dozen tons a day (could be wrong) due to spatial debris that is continually falling. With angular momentum conservation, the increasing mass would slow down Earth.
If anyone would care to estimate the rate of mass increase that would account for the observed slowing, the Earth's mass is about 6 X 1024. Me, I'm too lazy right now.
|
|
IP Logged |
"I always wondered about the meaning of life. So I looked it up in the dictionary under 'L' and there it was --- the meaning of life. It was not what I expected." (Dogbert)
|
|
|
wowbagger
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 727
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #13 on: Jan 31st, 2003, 5:10am » |
Quote Modify
|
Well, I'm not sure about the effect of water held behind dams on the speed of rotation of the earth. However, I think I read somewhere that such a redistribution of mass might be important with respect to the earth's precession (and nutation) as there is much more water dammed on the northern hemisphere than on the southern.
For those really interested, here's a piece of info I unearthed: http://dgfi2.dgfi.badw-muenchen.de/dgfi/DOC/poster_99_seite12.pdf.
Disclaimer: This poster is very technical. It does, however, seem to investigate the effect of the "Three Gorges Dam" on the rotation of the earth.
On the original question:
The "tidal braking" mechanism is quite well-known, I would say. (At least among those who know what brings about the tides in the first place - or the seasons etc.)
As for the second part, I agree with Chronos.
|
|
IP Logged |
"You're a jerk, <your surname>!"
|
|
|
aero_guy
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 513
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #14 on: Jan 31st, 2003, 12:27pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I agree, but thought the earth is slowing, the moon is not accelerating. The energy is lost to heat and such when the tidal forces change the shape of the earth, or at least its oceans, not transferred to the moon. The moon already went through this process and came to a "stop" long ago, matching its rotation with its orbit. In fact, every moon in the solar systems has already braked to its respective planet.
Another interesting side note: The moon's orbit is somewhat eliptical so there is a small wobble in which side is face us over an orbit. The same forces that matched its rotation to its orbit are now making the moon's orbit more circular. And for the next question: I have no idea whether it will come close to circular before the sun dies.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
James Fingas
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 949
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #15 on: Jan 31st, 2003, 1:43pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Aero Guy,
Although you can lose energy to heat, you can't lose angular momentum. That is to say, the earth/moon system can't stop rotating unless we consider tidal braking with the sun (don't ask me how big an effect this is), and even then, the earth/moon/sun system would still be rotating, unless we consider...
I guess the relevant question is: rotating with respect to what?
|
|
IP Logged |
Doc, I'm addicted to advice! What should I do?
|
|
|
aero_guy
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 513
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #16 on: Jan 31st, 2003, 8:01pm » |
Quote Modify
|
pesky basic laws of physics always getting in the way of a good explanation, should have caught that, thanks.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #17 on: Feb 1st, 2003, 5:50am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 31st, 2003, 12:27pm, aero_guy wrote:| I agree, but thought the earth is slowing, the moon is not accelerating. |
|
Acually the moon is accelerating, causing to move further and further away from earth.. Which also decreases it's angular velocity around earth, meaning it can never reach geostatic orbit (since it's allready much slower than 360 degrees per day)
|
| « Last Edit: Feb 2nd, 2003, 10:54am by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
aero_guy
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 513
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #18 on: Feb 3rd, 2003, 3:39am » |
Quote Modify
|
OK, I admit the earlier comment was wrong, but when you say it can never reach geostatic orbit are you taking into account the slowing of the earth's rotation? Which is slowing faster, its speed around the earth or the earth's rotation?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #20 on: Feb 3rd, 2003, 4:44am » |
Quote Modify
|
from http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~ryden/ast161_8/notes32.html
2) Tidal forces are gradually slowing down the Earth's rotation.
Friction heats things up (as you know if you've ever tried to warm your hands by rubbing them together). Thus, the friction between the ocean's tidal bulges and the solid earth beneath heats up the ocean. It's a small effect, but it's there. Energy can't be created out of nothing. Where did the energy to heat up the ocean come from? It came from the kinetic energy of the Earth's rotation on its axis. Thus, as the oceans gain energy, in the form of heat, the Earth loses rotation energy, and the rotation slows down. This process - the slowing of rotation due to the presence of tides - is called tidal braking.
Tidal braking doesn't work very rapidly. Currently, the length of the day here on Earth is increasing by roughly 2 milliseconds every century. During the Triassic period, about 240 million years ago, the Earth's day was only 23 hours long, and consequently there were 381 days per year.
Just as the Moon creates tidal bulges in the solid Earth, so the Earth creates tidal bulges in the solid Moon. Tidal braking, resulting from the big tidal bulges raised by the massive Earth, has ALREADY slowed the Moon to the point where it is ``locked in'' with the same side always facing the Earth. The fact that the Moon's period of rotation is equal to its period of rotation is not a coincidence, but is due to tidal braking.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------
(3) Tidal forces are gradually increasing the size of the Moon's orbit.
Consider the tidal bulge of the Earth which is closest to the Moon. Friction, as noted above, drags the waters of the bulge in the direction of the Earth's rotation, so that the bulge is always leading the Moon in its orbit, like a carrot held in front of a donkey. The extra little gravitational force exerted by the tidal bulge upon the Moon gives the Moon an extra little acceleration. The Moon, as a result of this extra acceleration, spirals slowly outward.
Currently, the distance between the Earth and Moon is increasing by 3.8 meters (about 4 yards) per century. This is not very rapid (it's about the rate at which your fingernails grow) but over billions of years, it adds up. In roughly 10 billion years, the Earth-Moon system will look significantly different from its current appearance:
* The Earth will keep the same face turned to the Moon, just as the Moon currently keeps the same face turned to the Earth.
* The Earth-Moon distance will be about 50 percent greater than it is now.
* The length of the sidereal month, with the Moon on a larger orbit, will be lengthened to about 47 current Earth days. (This will also be the rotation period of the Earth and the rotation period of the Moon.)
|
| « Last Edit: Feb 3rd, 2003, 4:46am by BNC » |
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #21 on: Feb 3rd, 2003, 7:04pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Feb 3rd, 2003, 4:44am, BNC wrote: In roughly 10 billion years, the Earth-Moon system will look significantly different from its current appearance:
* The Earth will keep the same face turned to the Moon, just as the Moon currently keeps the same face turned to the Earth.
* The Earth-Moon distance will be about 50 percent greater than it is now.
* The length of the sidereal month, with the Moon on a larger orbit, will be lengthened to about 47 current Earth days. (This will also be the rotation period of the Earth and the rotation period of the Moon.)
|
|
Alas - this overlooks one thing: In about 5 billion years the Sun will become a red giant. It's radius will swell up to slightly larger than the mean distance from the Earth to the Sun. So the Earth-Moon system will indeed look significantly different: it will no longer exist!
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
aero_guy
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 513
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #22 on: Feb 5th, 2003, 10:02pm » |
Quote Modify
|
OK, did the whole 10 bill year thing take into account the slowing change in the rate of change? Of course as the Earth and Moon near their ideal state they will change their orbits/rotations more slowly or do these numbers assume constant rate changes? On second thought I am not sure about that. Though the rate of change of the forces will be slower, they will have time to create greater deformations in the earth's surface which will take more energy to reverse. Dang, this is complex.
Oh, and I was also wondering if the system is critially damped or not. Will the Earth slow down a little too much, then have to speed up... and so on? By guesswork I would say it was critically damped, but I am not about to figure it out.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
James Fingas
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 949
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #23 on: Feb 6th, 2003, 1:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Aero Guy,
I would guess that the Earth-moon pair is closer to a single-order system. Even if it were a second-order system, to talk about underdamped versus critically damped versus overdamped, you have to have an oscillator.
An oscillator always has at least two forms of energy storage (for example gravity and velocity, an inductor and a capacitor, etc.), and in this situation, I can only see one (rotational kinetic energy).
|
|
IP Logged |
Doc, I'm addicted to advice! What should I do?
|
|
|
Chronos
Full Member
Gender:
Posts: 288
|
|
Re: Earth rotation
« Reply #24 on: Feb 8th, 2003, 4:10pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Quote:| An oscillator always has at least two forms of energy storage (for example gravity and velocity, an inductor and a capacitor, etc.), and in this situation, I can only see one (rotational kinetic energy). |
|
I, too, am not convinced that we can model the system as a damped oscillator, but there are indeed two forms of energy: Rotational kinetic and gravitational potential.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print
Remove