Author |
Topic: What am I doing? (Read 520 times) |
|
Leo Broukhis
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 459
|
|
What am I doing?
« on: May 15th, 2003, 9:01am » |
Quote Modify
|
I have a very long positive integer number, written in decimal. I take its last (least significant) digit, multiply it by 9 and add to the number formed by the remaining digits (e.g. 9999 -> 999 + 9*9 = 1080 -> 108 + 0*9 = 108 -> 10 + 8*9 = 82) until the result is less than 100. By looking at the result I can find something out about the original number. What is that property of the original number?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
wowbagger
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 727
|
|
Re: What am I doing?
« Reply #1 on: May 15th, 2003, 9:21am » |
Quote Modify
|
If you subtracted nine times the last digits from the rest, I'd know the answer.
|
« Last Edit: May 15th, 2003, 9:21am by wowbagger » |
IP Logged |
"You're a jerk, <your surname>!"
|
|
|
Leo Broukhis
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 459
|
|
Re: What am I doing?
« Reply #2 on: May 15th, 2003, 10:20am » |
Quote Modify
|
on May 15th, 2003, 9:21am, wowbagger wrote:If you subtracted nine times the last digits from the rest, I'd know the answer. |
| And it would be different from what I had in mind. But, I believe, you're thinking in the right direction. Hint: what's the fixed point of the transform?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Lightboxes
Full Member
Gender:
Posts: 203
|
|
Re: What am I doing?
« Reply #3 on: May 15th, 2003, 5:15pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Are we allowed to know the original number AND the result OR just the result and then we have to guess the orginal number's property?
|
|
IP Logged |
A job is not worth doing unless it's worth doing well.
|
|
|
Leo Broukhis
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 459
|
|
Re: What am I doing?
« Reply #4 on: May 15th, 2003, 5:50pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on May 15th, 2003, 5:15pm, Lightboxes wrote:Are we allowed to know the original number AND the result OR just the result and then we have to guess the orginal number's property? |
| For the sake of the puzzle, let's say that you're only allowed to know the result. Knowing that it was achieved by the transform in question, what is the property of the original number (and all intermediate results as well, of course) that you can assert?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
wowbagger
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 727
|
|
Re: What am I doing?
« Reply #6 on: May 16th, 2003, 2:28am » |
Quote Modify
|
on May 16th, 2003, 12:11am, Lightboxes wrote:There is also another pattern of +/- of 89 between possibilities. |
| That's the right track. Now, what property of a number could this be connected with?
|
« Last Edit: May 16th, 2003, 2:28am by wowbagger » |
IP Logged |
"You're a jerk, <your surname>!"
|
|
|
Lightboxes
Full Member
Gender:
Posts: 203
|
|
Re: What am I doing?
« Reply #7 on: May 16th, 2003, 11:46am » |
Quote Modify
|
If (R*10)>=100 then R=N; (N*10)-89=N for N>=100 This equation will give you all the possible intermediate and orginal numbers by using it again and again on the numbers that are created from the first step. 89 is also a prime number. Am I closer?
|
|
IP Logged |
A job is not worth doing unless it's worth doing well.
|
|
|
James Fingas
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 949
|
|
Re: What am I doing?
« Reply #8 on: May 16th, 2003, 12:34pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Uneducated guess: probably deciding whether or not a number is divisible by 89 I know that 89 is unaffected by the transform...
|
|
IP Logged |
Doc, I'm addicted to advice! What should I do?
|
|
|
Leo Broukhis
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 459
|
|
Re: What am I doing?
« Reply #9 on: May 16th, 2003, 3:04pm » |
Quote Modify
|
The "uneducated" guess is, nevertheless, correct.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|