Author 
Topic: Another Sequence (Read 1867 times) 

ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489


Another Sequence
« on: Apr 18^{th}, 2007, 8:21am » 
Quote Modify

35, 45, 60, X, 120, 180, 280, 450, 744, 1260

« Last Edit: Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 3:37pm by ThudnBlunder » 
IP Logged 
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.



Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7020


Re: Another Series
« Reply #1 on: Apr 18^{th}, 2007, 9:25am » 
Quote Modify

Roughly 80 or 81?


IP Logged 



ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489


Re: Another Series
« Reply #2 on: Apr 18^{th}, 2007, 10:15am » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 18^{th}, 2007, 9:25am, Grimbal wrote: Yes, it's a number in the 80's.


IP Logged 
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.



ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489


Re: Another Series
« Reply #3 on: Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 9:16am » 
Quote Modify

Actually, I should ask for a simple continuous function which generates the series.

« Last Edit: Apr 20^{th}, 2007, 3:32am by ThudnBlunder » 
IP Logged 
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.



Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7020


Re: Another Series
« Reply #4 on: Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 3:20pm » 
Quote Modify

f(x)*35 + f(x1)*45 + f(x2)*60 + f(x3)*X + f(x4)*120 + f(x5)*180 + f(x6)*280 + f(x7)*450 + f(x8)*744 + f(x9)*1260 where f(x) = sin(x·pi)/(x·pi) or something like that.


IP Logged 



ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #5 on: Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 3:38pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 3:20pm, Grimbal wrote:f(x)*35 + f(x1)*45 + f(x2)*60 + f(x3)*X + f(x4)*120 + f(x5)*180 + f(x6)*280 + f(x7)*450 + f(x8)*744 + f(x9)*1260 where f(x) = sin(x·pi)/(x·pi) or something like that. 
 I sinc you are being funny. No, it is not a trignometric function. (BTW, I have corrected the thread title.) MEGAhint: X = 83.1776....!!

« Last Edit: Apr 20^{th}, 2007, 12:50pm by ThudnBlunder » 
IP Logged 
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.



Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #6 on: Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 7:34pm » 
Quote Modify

Can you be more specific?


IP Logged 



ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #7 on: Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 8:00pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 7:34pm, Eigenray wrote: Yes


IP Logged 
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.



Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #8 on: Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 9:15pm » 
Quote Modify

Aha... it's much clearer once you divide by 120. Then you just have (2^{n}1)/n, with the missing value at n=0.


IP Logged 



ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #9 on: Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 9:28pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 19^{th}, 2007, 9:15pm, Eigenray wrote:Aha... it's much clearer once you divide by 120. Then you just have (2^{n}1)/n, with the missing value at n=0. 
 Well done!


IP Logged 
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.



Ulkesh
Junior Member
Posts: 147


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #10 on: Apr 21^{st}, 2007, 6:10am » 
Quote Modify

Hmm... I'm sure I've seen something similar a number of years ago. At the risk of sounding stupid, you need L'Hopital's theorem (pardon my bad French spelling)?


IP Logged 



Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #11 on: Apr 22^{nd}, 2007, 3:35pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 21^{st}, 2007, 6:10am, Ulkesh wrote:At the risk of sounding stupid, you need L'Hopital's theorem (pardon my bad French spelling)? 
 Are you really using l'Hopital to compute lim_{x>0} (f(x)f(0))/x as f'(0)?


IP Logged 



Ulkesh
Junior Member
Posts: 147


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #12 on: Apr 22^{nd}, 2007, 4:26pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 22^{nd}, 2007, 3:35pm, Eigenray wrote: Are you really using l'Hopital to compute lim_{x>0} (f(x)f(0))/x as f'(0)? 
 Yes, that seems correct given your f(x). Is there a problem?


IP Logged 



Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #13 on: Apr 22^{nd}, 2007, 6:44pm » 
Quote Modify

How do you define f'(0)?


IP Logged 



Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7020


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #14 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 2:09am » 
Quote Modify

Isn't it f'(x) computed for x=0? f(x) = 2^{x} f'(x) = e^{x·ln(2)}·ln(2) = 2^{x}·ln(2) f'(0) = 2^{0}·ln(2) = ln(2)


IP Logged 



Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #15 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 11:52am » 
Quote Modify

Let me rephrase. Do you see anything wrong with the following sentence: Quote:By l'Hopital's rule, lim_{x>0} [f(x)  f(0)]/x = f'(0). 
 ?


IP Logged 



towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13142


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #16 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:19pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 11:52am, Eigenray wrote:Let me rephrase. Do you see anything wrong with the following sentence: ? 
 Well, one might expect instead lim x0 f(x)/g(x) = lim x0 f'(x)/g'(x) but g(x)=x, and g'(x)=1, and lim x0 f'(x)=f'(0) So we have: lim x0 f(x)/x = f'(0) That still leaves the f(0) which is in fact 0, but it's a bit superfluous. It would rather be the definition of the derivative in 0 than an application of l'Hospital's rule, although it gives the same result.

« Last Edit: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:23pm by towr » 
IP Logged 
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB



Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1327


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #17 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:41pm » 
Quote Modify

I think Eigenray is pointing to the fact that it seems odd to use LHospital's rule to just see that the limit is f'(0). The given limit is the definition of f'(0). Eigenray, I am not sure what the premises of Lhospital rule are, but does it assume the existence of the derivative at the value which x tends to? In which case, there will be some circular logic in appplying LHospital's rule.

« Last Edit: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:47pm by Aryabhatta » 
IP Logged 



towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13142


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #18 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:49pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:41pm, Aryabhatta wrote:Eigenray, I am not sure what the premises of Lhospital rule are, but does it assume the existence of the derivative at the limit? In which case, there will be some circular logic. 
 L'Hospital's rule says so much as, if f(x) and g(x) are both 0 or both +/ then if lim f'(x)/g'(x) exist, we have lim f(x)/g(x) = lim f'(x)/g'(x) If f'(x) and g'(x) are both 0 or both +/ you can recurse. However that might never yield anythign usefull. (More at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LHospitalsRule.html)

« Last Edit: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:52pm by towr » 
IP Logged 
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB



Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1327


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #19 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:59pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:49pm, towr wrote: L'Hospital's rule says so much as, if f(x) and g(x) are both 0 or both +/ then if lim f'(x)/g'(x) exist, we have lim f(x)/g(x) = lim f'(x)/g'(x) 
 Hmm... Not sure if that is entirely incorrect. I think we also require g'(x) to be nonzero in an interval around the point in question.


IP Logged 



towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13142


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #20 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 2:20pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:59pm, Aryabhatta wrote:Hmm... Not sure if that is entirely incorrect. I think we also require g'(x) to be nonzero in an interval around the point in question. 
 If g'(x) is 0 as well, I don't see a problem (because then f'(x)/g'(x) wouldn't exist in that case and we already couldn't apply the rule for that reason). In the case g'(x) isn't 0, then g(x) would be rather odd, I think..


IP Logged 
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB



Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1327


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #21 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 4:32pm » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 2:20pm, towr wrote: If g'(x) is 0 as well, I don't see a problem (because then f'(x)/g'(x) wouldn't exist in that case and we already couldn't apply the rule for that reason). In the case g'(x) isn't 0, then g(x) would be rather odd, I think.. 
 Yes, but it might so happen that when g'(c) is 0, f'(c) is 0 and the Lim f'/g' actually exists (maybe by recursing like you said) and in this case it might not necessarily be the same as Lim f/g Anyway, we should not be polluting this thread with irrelevant information

« Last Edit: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 4:34pm by Aryabhatta » 
IP Logged 



Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #22 on: Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 5:05pm » 
Quote Modify

Consider the example f(x) = x + cos x sin x and g(x) = e^{sin x}(x + cos x sin x) as x . f/g diverges, while f'/g' 0.


IP Logged 
"Pi goes on and on and on ... And e is just as cursed. I wonder: Which is larger When their digits are reversed? "  Anonymous



towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13142


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #23 on: Apr 24^{th}, 2007, 12:42am » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 5:05pm, Icarus wrote:Consider the example f(x) = x + cos x sin x and g(x) = e^{sin x}(x + cos x sin x) as x . f/g diverges 
 Isn't it 1 everytime sin(x)=0 ?


IP Logged 
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB



Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7020


Re: Another Sequence
« Reply #24 on: Apr 24^{th}, 2007, 12:43am » 
Quote Modify

on Apr 23^{rd}, 2007, 1:41pm, Aryabhatta wrote:I think Eigenray is pointing to the fact that it seems odd to use LHospital's rule to just see that the limit is f'(0). The given limit is the definition of f'(0). 
 Ah, OK. Now I see what he was after.


IP Logged 



