wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Is p->q->q a tautology? »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 19th, 2024, 1:26am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   medium
(Moderators: Eigenray, william wu, SMQ, Grimbal, Icarus, towr, ThudnBlunder)
   Is p->q->q a tautology?
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Is p->q->q a tautology?  (Read 2849 times)
techno
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 4
Is p->q->q a tautology?  
« on: Sep 26th, 2012, 4:36pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

note that there are no parenthesis. Thanks for the help  Grin
IP Logged
Noke Lieu
Uberpuzzler
*****



pen... paper... let's go! (and bit of plastic)

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1884
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?   p_to_q.png
« Reply #1 on: Sep 26th, 2012, 7:07pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Depends on what you mean...
 
Not in this case.
IP Logged


a shade of wit and the art of farce.
techno
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 4
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?  
« Reply #2 on: Sep 26th, 2012, 9:03pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I think that's exactly what I meant. Thanks. But how would you solve it? What I did was this.
 
p->q->q
 
-p || (q->q)
 
-p || (-q||q)
 
-p || (T)
 
T.
 
Can you please explain me where I did something wrong? thanks for the help.
 
Or is it like this? I think this makes more sense but still.
 
 
p->q->q
 
(-p || q)->q
 
-(-p || q) || q
 
(p && q) || q
 
(p || q) && (q || q)
 
q && (p || q)
 
Thanks for replying so quickly.
 
IP Logged
techno
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 4
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?  
« Reply #3 on: Sep 26th, 2012, 9:06pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Actually I was wrong on the last thing I did.
 
It's  
 
(p && -q) || q
 
(q || p) && (-q || q)
 
( q || p ) && T
 
( q || p )
IP Logged
peoplepower
Junior Member
**





   


Posts: 63
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?  
« Reply #4 on: Sep 27th, 2012, 5:18am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

A self-implication is a tautology, so implying a self-implication is still a tautology.
I have personally seen implication as a right-associative operation exclusively, where we have in general
p->(q->r) <=> ~pV(~qVr) <=> ~(p&q)Vr <=> (p&q)->r.
IP Logged
techno
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 4
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?  
« Reply #5 on: Sep 27th, 2012, 8:56am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

That was my main concern. So it is a right associative operation. Thanks for the help appreciate it  Smiley
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board