|
||
Title: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof Post by william wu on Jan 28th, 2003, 3:44am This is probably not difficult, but I can't seem to get it. The question is to determine whether this statement is true or false, and justify (if true provide proof, if false provide counterexample): where the Ei's form a partition on the sample space. Intuitively I think it is true. We say, given that B has happened, let's look at a particular region of the universe Ei, and then measure the probability of A happening in that region. Then we look at a different region, and another, and another -- with all these regions being disjoint. In the end we add up the contributions from each region toward the probability that A happens, given that B happened. My problem is how to prove the statement formally. I tried doing algebraic manipulation on the right hand side, hoping everything would cancel out to make the left hand side. I applied the identity P(X | Y) = P(X AND Y) / P(Y) a few times. Stuck. Note 1: what is a partition you ask? if you imagine the sample space as some kind of shape like an oval, carve up the shape into pieces. the set of pieces comprise a partition. it's simply a set of jigsaw puzzle pieces that can be fit together to make the whole sample space. formally, the set { Ej } partitions a space S if all the Ej are pairwise disjoint and Union(Ej) = S. Note 2: thanks again to [towr] for super handy latex2png generator |
||
Title: Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof Post by towr on Jan 28th, 2003, 8:46am we have [hide] P(A|B) = sum(P(A|Ei)*P(Ei|B), i) [/hide] which expands to[hide] P(A AND B)/P(B) = sum(P(A AND Ei)/ P(Ei) * P(Ei AND B)/P(B), i)[/hide] Suppose there is only one partition, then Ei is always true, and we're left with[hide] P(A AND B)/P(B) = P(A) * P(B)/P(B) P(A AND B) = P(A) * P(B)[/hide] which isn't true in general.. but only when A and B are independant stochastic variables.. |
||
Title: Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof Post by william wu on Jan 28th, 2003, 3:53pm I don't think that constitutes a proof because it only works for the case where there is only one partition ... ? |
||
Title: Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof Post by william wu on Jan 28th, 2003, 4:47pm Ah I think I may know how to prove it. Use the following fact: [hide] P(A) = sumi [ P(Ei) P(A|Ei) ] [/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof Post by Icarus on Jan 28th, 2003, 5:35pm Towr was not proving the formula - he disproved it: If A and B are not independent, then the formula is false, at least for a single partition. |
||
Title: Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof Post by william wu on Jan 28th, 2003, 5:39pm Oh, whoops. Hmm, I guess my intuition isn't too hot. Thanks guys. |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |