wu :: forums (http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi)
riddles >> medium >> (71-1)(71+1) = 71
(Message started by: Grimbal on Jul 31st, 2004, 11:44am)

Title: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Grimbal on Jul 31st, 2004, 11:44am
Here is an equation: (71-1)(71+1) = 71

The astute reader will notice it is not true.

How can you make it a valid identity by adding
(a) a single dot
or (b) two dots
or (c) a single straight line.

Notes
1. For this problem, the 1 is a straight line, the 7 are 2 straight lines.
2. I want an IDENTITY.  Adding / on = is not an option.

[edit: change equation to identity]

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by honkyboy on Jul 31st, 2004, 4:06pm
for a single dot (a)
[hide](71-1)(71+1)=7!

A redundant dot could be added for two (not the intended answer I'm sure)
     (71-1).(71+1)=7![/hide]

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Grimbal on Jul 31st, 2004, 4:26pm
So fast?  Too bad.

Even though I asked only one option, and this was the intended slution, on another forum we foud a solution for all 3 cases.

So keep searching.

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Sir Col on Aug 1st, 2004, 3:55am
If we don't have to state the base (4969), we could write (71-1)(71+1)[equiv]71?  ::)

It may just be semantics, but 3+4=7 is an identity, not an equation. An identity is true for all values, whereas an equation must contain a variable and is true for some, or none, of the values. For example, x=3, is an equation, because x need not always be 3; 3x+4x=7x is an identity, because it is true for all values of x.

So how about the equation... [hide](71-L)(71+1)=71[/hide]?

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Grimbal on Aug 1st, 2004, 7:30am
OK, ok,  :(  I want an identity, then.

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Sir Col on Aug 1st, 2004, 8:00am
Sorry, I wasn't criticising.

I realised my "answer" wasn't what you were after, but I've been working on the single line part and I am still having difficulties. I don't suppose you would accept an inequality either... (71-1)(71+1)[ge]71?  :P

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Grimbal on Aug 1st, 2004, 2:15pm
EQUALITY!  That is what I meant by equation.

So, no inequality either.

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Icarus on Aug 3rd, 2004, 9:32pm

on 08/01/04 at 03:55:34, Sir Col wrote:
3+4=7 is an identity, not an equation ... an equation must contain a variable


What? By the definitions I've always used, an equation is a statement of the form "A = B", where A and B are any valid expressions. 3+4=7 most certainly IS an equation, as is 3+4=89. The latter is false, but it is still an equation. There is no requirement that a variable be present. All that is required is that the statement equate two things.

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by towr on Aug 4th, 2004, 12:21am

Quote:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Equation.html (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Equation.html):

A mathematical expression stating that two or more quantities are the same as one another, also called an equality (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Equality.html), formula (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Formula.html), or identity (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Identity.html).


Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Sir Col on Aug 4th, 2004, 3:25am
I got all excited when I saw that someone had posted here, thinking they had found a solution to Grimbal's last question.


We've been down this road before, but... ;)


Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation

In mathematics, one often (not quite always) distinguishes between an identity, which is an assertion that two expressions are equal regardless of the values of any variables that occur within them, and an equation, which may be true for only some (or none) of the values of any such variables. In equations, the values of the variables for which the equation is true are called solutions.


However, I checked in my (Collins) Mathematical Dictionary and it makes an interesting distinction...


Quote:
Equation, n a formula that asserts that two expressions have the same value; it is either an identical equation (usually called an IDENTITY), which is true for any values of the variables, or a conditional equation, which is only true for certain values of the variables (the ROOTS of the equation). For example, x2-1=(x+1)(x-1) is an identity, and x2-1=3 is a conditional equation, with roots [pm]2.


In light of this, I concede that my original objection was a little pedantic. However, I've learned something new; and I don't mean that I am pedantic. (I already knew that!)   :P

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by honkyboy on Aug 4th, 2004, 11:17am
I am stumped on the single straight line.  How about this solution for four dots:[hide](71-1)::(71+1)=71[/hide]

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Grimbal on Aug 4th, 2004, 12:24pm
A hint:
->[hide]The 2-dot solution is most likely to be found by a physicist...
The straight-line one more by ... well ... a typographer.
[/hide]<-

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Leonid Broukhis on Aug 4th, 2004, 7:32pm

on 08/04/04 at 11:17:41, honkyboy wrote:
I am stumped on the single straight line.  How about this solution for four dots:[hide](71-1)::(71+1)=71[/hide]


I am not familiar with this notation. What do 4 dots mean? A missing element of a sequence?

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Leonid Broukhis on Aug 4th, 2004, 7:33pm
Grimbal, are you implying an [hide]overbar[/hide]?

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by honkyboy on Aug 4th, 2004, 7:37pm
Four dot is for arithmetic mean.
4::6=5. the average of four and six is five.

Title: Re: (71-1)(71+1) = 71
Post by Grimbal on Aug 14th, 2004, 4:41pm
Ok, here are my answers.
(a) [hide](71-1)(71+1) = 7![/hide]
(b) [hide]put a dot over the first 1 and over the second 71.
A dot is a derivation relative to time d/dt.  For constants, it is zero.[/hide]
(c) [hide](71-1)(71+1) = 71
or (71-1)(71+1) = 71[/hide]



Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board