|
||||
Title: Identity Involving Fibonacci Number Post by Barukh on Mar 15th, 2007, 2:59am Prove the identity (61) at this resource (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FibonacciNumber.html). |
||||
Title: Re: Identity Involving Fibonacci Number Post by Aryabhatta on Mar 15th, 2007, 9:24am The identity in question: F_(n+1) = Sum _{ k = 0 to [n/2]} C(n-k, k) [hide] I think Induction combined with the identity C(n+1,k) = C(n,k) + C(n, k-1) used appropriately should do it. In fact the figure on that page, helps you identify the way to do it [/hide] |
||||
Title: Re: Identity Involving Fibonacci Number Post by Barukh on Mar 15th, 2007, 10:35am on 03/15/07 at 09:24:33, Aryabhatta wrote:
Thanks for putting it here! Quote:
Maybe, maybe... I am looking for a more elegant solution, though... |
||||
Title: Re: Identity Involving Fibonacci Number Post by Aryabhatta on Mar 15th, 2007, 12:39pm Ok. Here is another try [hide] f(n+1) is the number of ways of adding 1's and 2's so that they sum upto n. Now count the same thing in a different way: dependent on the number of 2's. If there are k 2's, there must be n-2k 1's. The number of ways of adding 1's and 2's to n, such that there are exactly k 2's is C(n-k,k) Thus f(n+1) = sum C(n-k,k) [/hide] The good part about this is that, it lets you actually come up with the identity! (and can be used to come up with other such similar identities) |
||||
Title: Re: Identity Involving Fibonacci Number Post by Aryabhatta on Mar 15th, 2007, 1:05pm Here is another identity which the above method can be used to get: Prove that f(2n+1) = f(n+1) 2 + f(n)2 |
||||
Title: Re: Identity Involving Fibonacci Number Post by Aryabhatta on Mar 15th, 2007, 1:07pm In fact, the general identity: f(m+n) = f(m)*f(n+1) + f(n)*f(m-1) |
||||
Title: Re: Identity Involving Fibonacci Number Post by Barukh on Mar 15th, 2007, 11:54pm on 03/15/07 at 12:39:21, Aryabhatta wrote:
Exactly! That is the argument I asked for! Isn't it beatiful? Well done, Aryabhatta! :D |
||||
Title: Re: Identity Involving Fibonacci Number Post by Aryabhatta on Mar 16th, 2007, 12:24am Thanks! I am quite happy at having got this :D Good that you did not accept the first proof... :) |
||||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |