wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Sine Product formula »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 18th, 2024, 10:02am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   putnam exam (pure math)
(Moderators: Icarus, Grimbal, Eigenray, william wu, SMQ, towr)
   Sine Product formula
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Sine Product formula  (Read 3255 times)
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Sine Product formula  
« on: Sep 4th, 2003, 6:12pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

While perusing my copy of CRC standard Mathematical Tables (a holdover from my college days) for trigonometric formulas, I came across a formula that I had penciled in at some time. I no longer remember where this formula came from, but it is interesting, and it works at least for [smiley=n.gif] [le] 4:
 
[smiley=s.gif][smiley=i.gif][smiley=n.gif] [smiley=n.gif][theta] = 2[supn][supminus][sup1] [prod][smiley=subk.gif]=0[supn][supminus][sup1] [smiley=s.gif][smiley=i.gif][smiley=n.gif] ([theta] + [smiley=k.gif][pi]/[smiley=n.gif])

 
Can anyone prove it?
Is there a corresponding formula for cosine?
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Barukh
Guest

Email

Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #1 on: Sep 5th, 2003, 7:50am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

Icarus, somehow it happens that I know the answers to some of your questions...
 
I've found this formula empirically a couple of years ago, and then found a derivation in an advanced textbook. Here's the sketch.
 
1. Start from deMoivre's formula: cos(n[phi]) + i*sin(n[phi]) = (cos[phi] + i*sin[phi])n. Use the binomial theorem to expand the right hand side, and get the following:

sin(n[phi]) = sin[phi] [sum]k <= n, k odd nCk (-1)j cosn-k[phi] sink-1[phi]
where j = (k-1)/2.
 
2. Change the indexing in the above formula from k to j. Then, sink-1[phi] may be rewritten as (1-cos2[phi])j, and it turns out that every term in the sum is a polynomial in cos[phi] of degree n-1. Therefore, sin(n[phi]) / sin[phi] is also a polynomial in cos[phi] of degree n-1 with the leading coefficient  
[sum]k oddnCk = 2n-1,
and we can write:

sin(n[phi]) / sin[phi] = 2n-1 [prod]k=1n-1 (cos[phi] - cos[phi]k)

3. [phi]k are exactly the angles where sin(n[phi]k) = 0, so [phi]k = k[pi]/n. Plug this into the product, and group together terms k and n-k. Then, use the formula for a cosine of a double angle together with the identities: cos([pi]-x) = -cos(x), and cos(2x) - cos(2y) = 2sin(x+y)sin(y-x) to arrive at the desired result.
 
Hope this helps.
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #2 on: Sep 5th, 2003, 3:32pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Well done! I was not entirely truthful in saying I have no idea where it came from. I'm pretty sure it came out of complex analysis. Now that you've pointed out that sin(n[theta]) is zero at k[pi]/n, I believe I have a better idea, if I ever bother to chase it down.
 
I vaguely recall writing it down because it was a slick consequence of some very powerful (and very nice) CA results.
 
But, as I'm sure you know, CA is the part of mathematics where practically everything works right.
 
While I don't believe your derivation is as slick as the CA one, it is nice indeed, and certainly more elementary.
 
I'm not sure, but I believe that the CA procedure only worked for sine, though I don't remember why.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
SWF
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Posts: 879
Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #3 on: Sep 23rd, 2003, 10:15pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Finding the most simple derivation for this one is more tricky than it looks. I found a pretty good approach which I believe is more simple than Barukh's. Turns out there is a comparable expression involving tangents than does not have the complication of the powers of 2:
 
[prod][smiley=subk.gif]=0[supn][supminus][sup1] [smiley=t.gif][smiley=a.gif][smiley=n.gif] ([theta] + [smiley=k.gif][pi]/[smiley=n.gif])  
equals (-1)n/2 when n is even and (-1)(n-1)/2tan(n[theta]) when n is odd.
 
An expression containing cosines is
 
2[supn][supminus][sup1] [prod][smiley=subk.gif]=0[supn][supminus][sup1] [smiley=c.gif][smiley=o.gif][smiley=s.gif] ([theta] + [smiley=k.gif][pi]/[smiley=n.gif])
equals (-1)n/2*sin(n[theta]) when n is even and (-1)(n-1)/2cos(n[theta]) when n is odd.
IP Logged
Cster
Guest

Email

Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #4 on: May 18th, 2004, 3:01pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

Here's a formula that popped up when looking at Legendre's relation on the Gamma function  
 
n = 2n-1[smiley=prod.gif]1n-1 sin(k*pi/n)
 
 I have not been able to prove it. Anybody know this one?
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #5 on: May 18th, 2004, 3:08pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

You could use the formula in the post above yours for cosine.
But I doubt your equation is true, which would make it difficult to prove..
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #6 on: May 18th, 2004, 10:16pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Take the formula I originally posted, and which Barukh has proved, divide both sides by [smiley=s.gif][smiley=i.gif][smiley=n.gif] [theta].
 
Then let [theta] [to] 0. The result is Cster's formula.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #7 on: May 18th, 2004, 11:41pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

ah.. I see I missed that one starts the product at k=0, and the other at k=1..
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
CSter
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 2
Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #8 on: May 19th, 2004, 9:09am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Thanks, Icarus!
I could not see how to wrangle my product out of yours.
That's pretty cool.
IP Logged
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 7526
Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #9 on: May 23rd, 2004, 3:52pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on May 18th, 2004, 3:01pm, Cster wrote:
Here's a formula that popped up when looking at Legendre's relation on the Gamma function  
 
n = 2n-1[smiley=prod.gif]1n-1 sin(k*pi/n)
 
 I have not been able to prove it. Anybody know this one?

I don't remember the details, but I could prove that formula using the eigenvalues of the matrix describing the movement of a string (in finite elements).  The matrix is tridiagonal, aij = -2 if i=j, 1 if i=j±1.  The eigenvalues are 1/2*sin(k*pi/n).  They are related to the harmonics of a swinging string.  If you compute the characteristic polynomial, there is a n as next-to-last coefficient, which also is the product of the eigenvalues.  There was some tweaking needed depending if n is odd or even, but it worked.
 
Sorry about the vagueness, but it is a long time ago.
IP Logged
SWF
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Posts: 879
Re: Sine Product formula  
« Reply #10 on: May 31st, 2004, 6:01pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Below, is the "simple" solution I mentioned back in September. Complex conjugate of z will be denoted by <z>, and the [prod] symbol means product for k=0 to n-1.
 
The 2n roots of z2n-1=0, will be denoted by [omega]k, k=0,1,2,...,2n-1 and equal exp(i[pi]k/n).
 
A couple of results that follow from [omega]2n=1 and [omega]n=-1:
(1) [prod] [omega]k+1 = [omega]n(n+1)/2 = (-1)(n+1)/2 = in+1
(2) <[omega]k> = [omega]2n-k
 
Since the roots of zn -  <a>n = 0, are <a>*[omega]2k, k=0,1,2,...,n-1,
zn - <a>n = [prod] (z - <a>[omega]2k)
Using (1), this equals -i/in * [prod] [omega]n-k*(z - <a>[omega]2k)
From (2) it becomes -i/in * [prod] (z*[omega]n-k - <a*[omega]n-k>).
 
Setting z to a=exp(i*[theta]), and strategically introducing 2's gives:
(an - <an>)/(2*i) = -2n-1 [prod] (a*[omega]n-k - <a*[omega]n-k>)/(2*i)
 
The negative sign goes away when [omega]n (= -1) is factored from the k=0 term, and the result follows from
 sin([phi]) = (exp(i*[phi])-<exp(i*[phi])>)/(2*i)
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board