wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Rank of Redheffer Matrix »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 5th, 2024, 3:47am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   putnam exam (pure math)
(Moderators: william wu, SMQ, Eigenray, Icarus, towr, Grimbal)
   Rank of Redheffer Matrix
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Rank of Redheffer Matrix  (Read 1234 times)
Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1321
Rank of Redheffer Matrix  
« on: Apr 11th, 2007, 4:54pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Let RHn be the nxn RedHeffer matrix defined as:
 
RHn(i,j) = 1 if i divides j or j = 1
RHn(i,j) = 0 otherwise.
 
For instance RH4 is
[1 1 1 1]
[1 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0]
[1 0 0 1]
 
 
Prove that the rank of RHn is atleast n-1.
« Last Edit: Apr 11th, 2007, 5:51pm by Aryabhatta » IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Rank of Redheffer Matrix  
« Reply #1 on: Apr 11th, 2007, 6:48pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The lower-right (n-1)x(n-1) submatrix is upper unitriangular.
 
2) Show that
 
det(RHn) = k=1n  (k).
 
Hence RHn is invertible except for
 
n=2, 39, 40, 58, 65, 93, ....
 
3) Is the above set infinite?
IP Logged
Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1321
Re: Rank of Redheffer Matrix  
« Reply #2 on: Apr 12th, 2007, 12:39am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Apr 11th, 2007, 6:48pm, Eigenray wrote:

3) Is the above set infinite?

 
Is this known?
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Rank of Redheffer Matrix   mertenfn.gif
« Reply #3 on: Apr 12th, 2007, 3:48pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

No idea.  You'd think they would say one way or the other on Mathworld, but Sloane usually says when a sequence is not known to be infinite.
 
It seems likely though.  Here's a graph of M(n)/n.  It looks roughly like a random walk.
 
But it's not as a random as it looks -- on the right is a graph of A(A(A(M))), where
 
A(F)(n) = 1/n k=1n F(k)
 
is the averaging operator.  The position of the n-th maxima fits Ce.45 n pretty well.
IP Logged

Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board