wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Stuck on a radical »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 20th, 2024, 7:40am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   putnam exam (pure math)
(Moderators: Icarus, towr, SMQ, Eigenray, william wu, Grimbal)
   Stuck on a radical
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Stuck on a radical  (Read 1039 times)
TruthlessHero
Newbie
*






    pokertriad
Email

Gender: male
Posts: 40
Stuck on a radical  
« on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 2:04pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify


 
Book says it's -1/6, but I keep getting either -4/3 or -9/3.  
 
Any advice? I've done dozens of similar problems and gotten them all right...
 
Err yeah - the equation = 0... Not sure how I forgot to put that in the image  Shocked
« Last Edit: Dec 2nd, 2007, 2:06pm by TruthlessHero » IP Logged
pex
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 880
Re: Stuck on a radical  
« Reply #1 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 2:46pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Are you sure you copied everything correctly? As it stands, you have 2*sqrt(-x+1) - sqrt(2x-5) = 0. I can see neither of the solutions you mention as valid, but I find x = 3/2 as the only solution.
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Stuck on a radical  
« Reply #2 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 2:50pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

(2x - 5) isn't real for x < 2.5 and 2(-x+1) isn't real for x > 1
So to end up as zero, I'd say they both need to have an imaginary part (because they can't be real at the same time) and so 1 < x < 2.5
Which means, I can't find myself in any of the three suggestions.
 
[edit]I find pex's 3/2 quite agreeable[/edit]
« Last Edit: Dec 3rd, 2007, 12:59am by towr » IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
FiBsTeR
Senior Riddler
****





   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 581
Re: Stuck on a radical  
« Reply #3 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 3:24pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

You might want to make sure that you 1) copied the problem right, 2) copied the answer to the problem correctly from the book, and 3) copied the answer from the correct problem.
 
pex's solution is the one for this particular problem:
 
2sqrt(-x+1) - sqrt(2x-5) = 0
2sqrt(-x+1) = sqrt(2x-5)
4(-x+1) = 2x-5
-4x + 4 = 2x-5
6x = 9
x = 3/2
 
Inserting the solution back to the problem tells us that this is a (and the only) solution.
IP Logged
TruthlessHero
Newbie
*






    pokertriad
Email

Gender: male
Posts: 40
Re: Stuck on a radical  
« Reply #4 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 4:56pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Believe me, I've checked the question and answer at least a half dozen times, and I still see the problem, as stated, with a solution of -1/6. But, I hadn't really looked for a way to disprove it at the time of the posting ( I merely assumed the book was right. ). So I give a collective "thank you" to you three. I will be showing my professor the typo next class.
IP Logged
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1261
Re: Stuck on a radical  
« Reply #5 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 7:12pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I think if you have sqrt(2x+5) in there, the answer will be -1/6...
IP Logged

"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
TruthlessHero
Newbie
*






    pokertriad
Email

Gender: male
Posts: 40
Re: Stuck on a radical  
« Reply #6 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 7:24pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Yeah, I noticed that too, and my teacher agrees (emailed her) that that must be the typo.
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: Stuck on a radical  
« Reply #7 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 7:28pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The problem solver made a mistake and solved this problem instead:
 
2 sqrt(-x + 1) - sqrt(2 x + 5)
 
whose solution is x = -1/6.
 
 
edit: as Sameer pointed out.  
 
You'll discover that there are lots of errors in basic algebra  
books like this one: over confidence on the part of the  
problem solver and the fact that this level is generally
routine and boring leads to these sort of errors, and it is  
not true that authors write all the problems or check  
the solutions either. In fact, a publisher may at
the last minute hire a proofreader to read the book
when there simply isn't enough time to do it.
 
 
« Last Edit: Dec 2nd, 2007, 7:47pm by Michael Dagg » IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board