wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - x^x=5 »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Mar 28th, 2024, 3:45am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   putnam exam (pure math)
(Moderators: Icarus, Grimbal, SMQ, towr, Eigenray, william wu)
   x^x=5
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: x^x=5  (Read 5555 times)
temporary
Full Member
***





   


Posts: 255
x^x=5  
« on: Jan 23rd, 2008, 6:40pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The title says it all. Try x^x=i if you have already solved the previous one. Hintsqrt(n)^sqrt(n)^sqrt(n)...=n when done from up to down
« Last Edit: Jan 23rd, 2008, 6:40pm by temporary » IP Logged

My goal is to find what my goal is, once I find what my goal is, my goal will be complete.
Obob
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 489
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #1 on: Jan 23rd, 2008, 11:39pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Please don't post riddles when you have no idea what you are talking about.
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #2 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 12:20am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Thinking sensibly, you can contrive an exponential  
function for this equation that is a Lambert function  
-- not really difficult either.
 
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #3 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 5:02am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It's pretty much example 2 on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_function
 
So ln(5)/W(ln(5))
Not a very elucidating result, mind you.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #4 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 4:56pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The "hint" is easily demonstrated to be false. If it were true, then (n)n = n. But this is not true for most values of n.
 
That ii = i is a fun little result. iz is normally a multi-valued function. But all the various values collapse at z = i to just one.
 
As for xx = 5, I get x = 2.129372483...
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
ThudnBlunder
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #5 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 6:20pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jan 24th, 2008, 4:56pm, Icarus wrote:

That ii = i is a fun little result.  

I would call that funny.   Roll Eyes
IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Obob
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 489
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #6 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 6:25pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Unfortunately ii=i also isn't true...  It is true that ii isn't multi-valued, but the value is e- pi/2.
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #7 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 6:35pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

&$#*(&!! Embarassed Embarassed
 
Dropped an i and didn't notice it!
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
temporary
Full Member
***





   


Posts: 255
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #8 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 7:52pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I don't know where you get i^i=i, but i^i=e^-pi/2 +-2pi(k) where k is any integer.
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2008, 7:53pm by temporary » IP Logged

My goal is to find what my goal is, once I find what my goal is, my goal will be complete.
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #9 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 8:29pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

You might consider reading the three posts following that one, where this little mystery is solved.
 
Of course, I have the small satisfaction of partially confusing Obob with my gibberish. You are correct that ii is multivalued.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
temporary
Full Member
***





   


Posts: 255
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #10 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 9:14pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Especially since ^i involves natural logarithm, which is endlessly multivalued.
IP Logged

My goal is to find what my goal is, once I find what my goal is, my goal will be complete.
Obob
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 489
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #11 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 10:31pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Ah yes, ii is multivalued.  I must have fallen victim to the same mistake Icarus did.  In fact zw is always multivalued unless either z=0 or w=0, even if say z and w are integers, so that we know what zw means in the normal sense.
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #12 on: Jan 25th, 2008, 6:10pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It wasn't the multi-valuedness of the logarithm that was my downfall. I dropped an i from my calculation and so ended up with ei/2 + 2ki  = i for all values of k.
 
Of course, it was silly not to have noticed such a farcical result even while posting it.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #13 on: Jan 25th, 2008, 8:00pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jan 24th, 2008, 10:31pm, Obob wrote:
In fact zw is always multivalued unless either z=0 or w=0, even if say z and w are integers, so that we know what zw means in the normal sense.  

Even if w is an integer?  Huh
 
on Jan 25th, 2008, 6:10pm, Icarus wrote:
It wasn't the multi-valuedness of the logarithm that was my downfall. I dropped an i from my calculation and so ended up with ei\subpi/2 + 2k\subpii  = i for all values of k.

So what you really showed is that i1 = i, which is a bit more plausible.  Wink
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #14 on: Jan 25th, 2008, 8:05pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Indeed. I showed the full value of my 11 1/2 years of college mathematics to produce this amazing and unexpected result!
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Obob
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 489
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #15 on: Jan 25th, 2008, 10:29pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Wow, I've been making a lot of mistakes lately.  You are of course right Eigenray.  For some reason in my back-of-the-envelope calculation I deduced that e2 pi i w = 1 implies w = 0...
IP Logged
temporary
Full Member
***





   


Posts: 255
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #16 on: Jan 26th, 2008, 11:08am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Or any other integer.
IP Logged

My goal is to find what my goal is, once I find what my goal is, my goal will be complete.
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #17 on: Jan 26th, 2008, 8:10pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I think I see the idea behind the ill-formed hint:
 
If xx = z, then x = z1/x = z1/z^(1/x) = z1/z^(1/(z^(1/x))) = ...
 
If you make an initial guess x0 for x and form the sequence xn = z^(1/xn-1), and if the sequence converges, it will converge to x.
 
If the sequence fails to converge, then try xn = ln(z)/ln(xn-1).
 
The first series converges for both z = 5 and z = i.
 
For z = i, the value is about 1.36062487029112 + i 1.11943916624235 (using the principle branch of ln(z) when calculating all values).
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
temporary
Full Member
***





   


Posts: 255
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #18 on: Jan 27th, 2008, 11:25am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Good, now here is another one. x^x=0. Except this time, I know the answer.
IP Logged

My goal is to find what my goal is, once I find what my goal is, my goal will be complete.
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #19 on: Jan 27th, 2008, 11:34am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

So does everyone here: there is no solution (not in anyway).
« Last Edit: Jan 27th, 2008, 11:36am by Icarus » IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
temporary
Full Member
***





   


Posts: 255
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #20 on: Jan 27th, 2008, 3:04pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

There is a solution. Srn347 might have known it.
IP Logged

My goal is to find what my goal is, once I find what my goal is, my goal will be complete.
Obob
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 489
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #21 on: Jan 27th, 2008, 5:49pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I've told this to srn347 as well:
 
Take your crappy nonsense out of Putnam.  This is not the place for it.
IP Logged
temporary
Full Member
***





   


Posts: 255
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #22 on: Jan 27th, 2008, 7:34pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Take your ****** language and attitude out of my thread. This is not a place for it.
IP Logged

My goal is to find what my goal is, once I find what my goal is, my goal will be complete.
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #23 on: Jan 27th, 2008, 8:53pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

There is NO solution in . 0^0 = 1, and if x 0, then xy 0 either, for any y, and any acceptable definition of exponentiation.
 
I'm guessing that you are thinking something like (-)-. But infinities don't work that way. (-)- is an undefined form, and for very good reason.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: x^x=5  
« Reply #24 on: Jan 27th, 2008, 9:10pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jan 27th, 2008, 5:49pm, Obob wrote:
I've told this to srn347 as well:
 
Take your crappy nonsense out of Putnam.  This is not the place for it.

 
Obob, it really isn't your call what goes here. The x^x = 5 and x^x = i puzzles are entirely appropriate to this forum, even if they are not as abstract as most of the stuff here. There are a number of other problems in this forum that they match quite well with. Admittedly, temporary doesn't understand the issues he brought up, but there is interesting stuff here non-the-less. When I was in college, my text and reference books were mostly written in the 1970s before people started paying attention to the Lambert W function, and since I wasn't involved in this area of study, I never knew anything about it, until I encountered it here.
 
Temporary's smug misunderstandings can be annoying at times, but he and his idol are not the first to match this description. And there is value here.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board