Author |
Topic: MATHEMATICS (Read 8099 times) |
|
DOUBELL
Newbie
Posts: 3
|
CAN SOMEONE PROVE BY Mathematical induction that (2r)^3 = 2 (n^2) (n+1)^2 . need help with this one.
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender: 
Posts: 13730
|
 |
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #1 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 8:52am » |
 Quote  Modify
|
I think you may have stated the problem incorrectly or incompletely. Since there seem to be no constraints on the values of r and n the two sides are plainly not equal for all values of n and r.
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
DOUBELL
Newbie
Posts: 3
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #2 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 9:11am » |
Quote Modify
|
it is fact correct since for r=1 the LHs is (2)^3 = 8
AND FOR N =1 THE RIGHT HAND SIDE IS 2(1^2) (1+1)^2= 2 (2)^2 = 8.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
pex
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 880
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #3 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 11:41am » |
Quote Modify
|
I cannot find any other integer solutions than
r=0, n=-1
r=0, n=0
r=1, n=-2
r=1, n=1.
I don't see what mathematical induction could have to do with it, except perhaps in proving that there are no other solutions (or that there are, but I missed them).
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
ThudnBlunder
Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #4 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:22pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Maybe LHS should be  (2n3)
|
|
IP Logged |
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
|
|
|
pex
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 880
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #5 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:31pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 1st, 2011, 12:22pm, ThudnBlunder wrote:| Maybe LHS should be (2n3) |
|
I am impressed by your mind-reading skills!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
ThudnBlunder
Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #6 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:42pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 1st, 2011, 12:31pm, pex wrote:
I am impressed by your mind-reading skills! |
|
Thank you, pex. [fingernail_polishing_smiley]
|
| « Last Edit: Sep 1st, 2011, 4:01pm by ThudnBlunder » |
IP Logged |
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #7 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:52pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Ah, then it makes sense
base case,
 0..0 (2r)3 = 0 = 2 * 02 * (0+1)2
induction under assumption it's true for every natural number smaller than n:
0..n (2r)3
= {move last term from sum}
0..n-1 (2r)3 + (2n)3
= {invoke induction hypothesis}
2 * n2 * (n-1)2 + 8n * n2
= {regroup terms}
2 * ((n-1)2 + 4n) * n2
= {simplify}
2 * n2 * (n+1)2
|
| « Last Edit: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:54pm by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
DOUBELL
Newbie
Posts: 3
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #8 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 1:52pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 1st, 2011, 12:22pm, ThudnBlunder wrote:| Maybe LHS should be (2n3) |
|
THAT IS IN FACT CORRECT ABOUT THE LEFT HAND SIDE
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 500
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #9 on: Feb 29th, 2012, 9:53pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Gee. One might ask if induction is valid within an
induction argument itself. What you do think?
|
|
IP Logged |
Regards,
Michael Dagg
|
|
|
Jack Hadin
Newbie
Gender:
Posts: 2
|
|
Re: MATHEMATICS
« Reply #10 on: Oct 29th, 2012, 11:13am » |
Quote Modify
|
I think you have recorded the problem wrongly or perhaps incompletely. Because on a search engine appear to be no constraints throughout the principles of r along with n the two sides tend to be plainly not equal for every one of the principles of n also as r.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print