wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 23rd, 2024, 5:19am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   what happened
(Moderators: ThudnBlunder, william wu, towr, SMQ, Icarus, Eigenray, Grimbal)
   3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  (Read 15409 times)
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« on: Aug 29th, 2007, 11:08am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

A person flips a coin with you and he says"heads I win tails you lose". You agree to it. How do you win?
 
Yugi and Atem are playing yugioh against many people in a row. Yugi has a 50% chance of winning and Atem has a 50% chance losing. For those of you who don't know, they switch which soul/mind is used and they share a body. Why/when would they switch.
 
When you say no, do you mean yes?
« Last Edit: Aug 29th, 2007, 11:53am by srn437 » IP Logged
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
*****



A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1105
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #1 on: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:08pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

1. Give him a double sided tails coin to flip or you flip that coin.
 
2. Pardon, it shouldn't matter when or if ever, they have the same relative chance it seems.
 
3.  When I say no, I mean no.
IP Logged

"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #2 on: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:11pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

One of those answers is correct.
IP Logged
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
*****



A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1105
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #3 on: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:12pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

When you say one of those answers are correct, do you mean that I think that these are lame?
 
This should be in the easy section, if I can fluke it. Seriously.
« Last Edit: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:13pm by mikedagr8 » IP Logged

"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #4 on: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:16pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

All you got was the third one. If you can fluke them, do it!
IP Logged
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
*****



A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1105
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #5 on: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:17pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

No I mean that if I can look at them for 10 seconds and still be correct, they're not hard.
IP Logged

"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #6 on: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:19pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The last one may have been kind of easy(I wanted to trick you into saying no, which would have meant yes), but you still can't solve the other ones.
IP Logged
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
*****



A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1105
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #7 on: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:23pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Given time and logical understanding anything I do can be solved. Just now, I don't have the time. I'm trying to finish reading through all the updates so I can start doing my logs assignment.
IP Logged

"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #8 on: Aug 29th, 2007, 5:27pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Then why call it easy without time to prove it? Then why call it easy without time to prove it? Then why call it easy without time to prove it? Then why call it easy without time to prove it?
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #9 on: Aug 30th, 2007, 12:51am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Aug 29th, 2007, 11:08am, srn347 wrote:
A person flips a coin with you and he says "heads I win tails you lose". You agree to it. How do you win?
Cheat
e.g. Make it come up on its side. (Some soft underground like clay might help with that, although some coins can be balanced well enough on the side).
Coins without a head or tail would work as well.
 
Quote:
Yugi and Atem are playing yugioh against many people in a row. Yugi has a 50% chance of winning and Atem has a 50% chance losing. For those of you who don't know, they switch which soul/mind is used and they share a body. Why/when would they switch.
Yugi has at least as high a chance of winning as Atem, so he should always play.
And isn't the game properly called "duel monsters" or something?
(Of course prolonged playing might tire Yugi, dropping his successrate; so once it drops below Atem's, he should take over.)
 
Yugi and Atem always win when it counts though.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 7526
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #10 on: Aug 30th, 2007, 2:08am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

- A person flips a coin with you and he says"heads I win tails you lose". You agree to it. How do you win?
- By chance.
Oops, I see the trick now.  Shame on me.
Maybe:
- By saying: "I bet you'll win!"
- By saying: "More specifically: heads we both win tails we both lose."
- You examine the coin, say: "OK, you won", and pocket it.
 
- Yugi and Atem are playing yugioh against many people in a row. Yugi has a 50% chance of winning and Atem has a 50% chance losing. For those of you who don't know, they switch which soul/mind is used and they share a body. Why/when would they switch.
- They both win with 50% chance, so it doesn't matter who plays.  A switch could be considered cheating by other players, so don't.
 
- When you say no, do you mean yes?
- Noooo!  Absolutely not!  How can you think such a thing of me?  Roll Eyes
« Last Edit: Aug 30th, 2007, 3:22am by Grimbal » IP Logged
rmsgrey
Uberpuzzler
*****





134688278 134688278   rmsgrey   rmsgrey


Gender: male
Posts: 2872
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #11 on: Aug 30th, 2007, 2:34am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

1) "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?"
 
2) Is it possible to draw in Yugioh?
 
3) No.
IP Logged
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #12 on: Sep 3rd, 2007, 9:03pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Aug 30th, 2007, 2:08am, Grimbal wrote:
- A person flips a coin with you and he says"heads I win tails you lose". You agree to it. How do you win?
- By chance.
Oops, I see the trick now.  Shame on me.
Maybe:
- By saying: "I bet you'll win!"
- By saying: "More specifically: heads we both win tails we both lose."
- You examine the coin, say: "OK, you won", and pocket it.
 
- Yugi and Atem are playing yugioh against many people in a row. Yugi has a 50% chance of winning and Atem has a 50% chance losing. For those of you who don't know, they switch which soul/mind is used and they share a body. Why/when would they switch.
- They both win with 50% chance, so it doesn't matter who plays.  A switch could be considered cheating by other players, so don't.
 
- When you say no, do you mean yes?
- Noooo!  Absolutely not!  How can you think such a thing of me?  Roll Eyes

 
Good answers, but no, grimbal. Rmsgrey, you must play, and you usually can draw in yugioh, but in this riddle no. Here's a hint, if you play n games, you win n-1 or n with 50-50 probability. And grimbal, it isn't considered cheating.
IP Logged
Ghost Sniper
Senior Riddler
****



Do not hide. It is useless.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 599
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #13 on: Sep 4th, 2007, 11:35am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Aug 29th, 2007, 11:08am, srn347 wrote:
A person flips a coin with you and he says"heads I win tails you lose". You agree to it. How do you win?
 

 
Well, technically you could manipulate how you say it. For example, if it is heads, you can say "You said heads I win!" , the "I" meaning yourself, and the "You" meaning the other person. If it is tails, then you do the opposite of that. That way, you win either way.
« Last Edit: Sep 5th, 2007, 4:56pm by Ghost Sniper » IP Logged

*sob* I miss my mommy... *blows nose* huh, I'm on? oh right.

(thinks to self) Time for my speech to these college kids.

"Reason is more important than all emotions..."
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #14 on: Sep 4th, 2007, 5:21pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

So close.
IP Logged
mikedagr8
Uberpuzzler
*****



A rich man is one who is content; not wealthy.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1105
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #15 on: Sep 5th, 2007, 4:36am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

You repeat the statement of "heads I win, tails you lose". This way you win every time, if they argue you just repeat the statement proclaiming that they agreed to it, proving that you always win.
IP Logged

"It's not that I'm correct, it's that you're just not correct, and so; I am right." - M.P.E.
Roy42
Senior Riddler
****






    ddhilltop2


Gender: male
Posts: 418
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #16 on: Sep 5th, 2007, 4:39am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

1. You punch the guy and run off with his wallet, or you lose the coin down a drain or something before you get the chance to flip it.
 
2. Why is because they are fighting in the shadow realm and yugi can't hold his own very long, or like the series, they end up playing Pegasus and use the switch strategy so he can't read their mind/s
 
3. In response to that question or another?
IP Logged

Regards,

≈Roy42
Ghost Sniper
Senior Riddler
****



Do not hide. It is useless.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 599
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #17 on: Sep 5th, 2007, 4:54pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I put the words in the wrong order in my last post. I edited it. see if it works now
« Last Edit: Sep 5th, 2007, 4:56pm by Ghost Sniper » IP Logged

*sob* I miss my mommy... *blows nose* huh, I'm on? oh right.

(thinks to self) Time for my speech to these college kids.

"Reason is more important than all emotions..."
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #18 on: Sep 5th, 2007, 6:13pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

On the first one, if it's heads you say"If it was tails I would have lost, but it wasn't so I don't" and vice-verca. For the yugioh thing, after the first game if you won, switch. Since that was 50%, the other 50%(you losing)won't happen, so you switch every match starting after your first win(which occurs after 1 or 2 matches). The third answer is anything that implies no without saying it(like nope, or negative).
IP Logged
FiBsTeR
Senior Riddler
****





   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 581
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #19 on: Sep 5th, 2007, 7:00pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 5th, 2007, 6:13pm, srn347 wrote:
On the first one, if it's heads you say"If it was tails I would have lost, but it wasn't so I don't" and vice-verca. For the yugioh thing, after the first game if you won, switch. Since that was 50%, the other 50%(you losing)won't happen, so you switch every match starting after your first win(which occurs after 1 or 2 matches). The third answer is anything that implies no without saying it(like nope, or negative).

 
 Huh There seems so many things wrong here I don't know where to begin.
 
"If it was tails I would have lost, but it wasn't so I don't"
 
Let: p = tails comes up, q = I lose, ~p = not p, ~q = not q
 
You're saying that: (p --> q) --> (~p --> ~q), or that the statement implies the inverse. That doesn't work.
 
"Since that was 50%, the other 50%(you losing)won't happen"
 
This argument came up before (edit: found it!), about how a "1-in-2" chance means that if it doesn't happen the first time, it must happen the next time. This isn't how probability is defined, assuming these games are independent of each other.
« Last Edit: Sep 5th, 2007, 7:15pm by FiBsTeR » IP Logged
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #20 on: Sep 5th, 2007, 10:57pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I was assuming they were dependant. And what is with that arrow thing? I've seen it before, but what does it represent.
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #21 on: Sep 6th, 2007, 12:33am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It doesn't help to switch, even if the chances are strictly dependent, you'd still overall lose half the games. Because if Yugi switches after having won, then if Atem wins the second round, whoever plays the third round will lose again. And it would continue win-lose-win-lose etc
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Ghost Sniper
Senior Riddler
****



Do not hide. It is useless.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 599
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #22 on: Sep 6th, 2007, 10:53am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Aug 29th, 2007, 11:08am, srn347 wrote:
A person flips a coin with you and he says"heads I win tails you lose". You agree to it. How do you win?
 

 
I misread the question...
 
I thought it was "Heads I win tails I lose".
 
i guess I'm too used to that...
IP Logged

*sob* I miss my mommy... *blows nose* huh, I'm on? oh right.

(thinks to self) Time for my speech to these college kids.

"Reason is more important than all emotions..."
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #23 on: Sep 8th, 2007, 7:43pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 6th, 2007, 12:33am, towr wrote:
It doesn't help to switch, even if the chances are strictly dependent, you'd still overall lose half the games. Because if Yugi switches after having won, then if Atem wins the second round, whoever plays the third round will lose again. And it would continue win-lose-win-lose etc

 
No, because it was 50% I win and I won so the next 50% won't happen and that is me losing if I switch(which I do).
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: 3 NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLES  
« Reply #24 on: Sep 9th, 2007, 7:26am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 8th, 2007, 7:43pm, srn347 wrote:
No, because it was 50% I win and I won so the next 50% won't happen and that is me losing if I switch(which I do).
That makes absolutely no sense.
 
Besides, if if that nonsensical bit of reason held true, Atem could still loose after switching, then of course you wouldn't switch so he'd win the next round, but then you'd have to switch again. And then why wouldn't Yugi lose?
Or are you proposing both Yugi and Atem always win the first round in a series?
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board