wu :: forums - Print Page


    
      
        wu :: forums
        (http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi)
      

        riddles >> what happened >> TWELVE ANGRY MEN
        
(Message started by: alien2 on Jan 7^th, 2017, 7:40am)

Title: TWELVE ANGRY MEN
Post by alien2 on Jan 7^th, 2017, 7:40am

AFTER A MURDER TRIAL TWELVE JURORS TAKE A PRELIMINARY VOTE. MOST ARE CONVINCED THAT THE ACCUSED IS GUILTY. TWELVE VOTED NOT GUILTY. WHY?

Title: Re: TWELVE ANGRY MEN
Post by rloginunix on Jan 7^th, 2017, 8:41am

(you meant "not guiltY"?)

The voting took place [hide]at two different locations among two different sets of jurors[/hide]?

(good flick, btw)

Title: Re: TWELVE ANGRY MEN
Post by alien2 on Jan 7^th, 2017, 10:21am

on 01/07/17 at 08:41:55, rloginunix wrote:

(you meant "not guiltY"?)

Yep. I corrected it.

This time I am looking for the intended answer only. Sorry.

Title: Re: TWELVE ANGRY MEN
Post by dudiobugtron on Jan 7^th, 2017, 11:23am

[hide]After the preliminary vote, they discussed it and took a subsequent vote. In that vote, they all voted not guilty. I guess one of the jurors was very persuasive.[/hide]

Title: Re: TWELVE ANGRY MEN
Post by alien2 on Jan 7^th, 2017, 11:36am

I too like the film. However, only the preliminary vote is of importance here.

The remake is quite good but I myself prefer the film with Henry Fonda.

Title: Re: TWELVE ANGRY MEN
Post by dudiobugtron on Jan 7^th, 2017, 2:43pm

[hide]Twelve[/hide] was the [hide]name[/hide] of the [hide]dissenting voice.[/hide]

Title: Re: TWELVE ANGRY MEN
Post by alien2 on Jan 7^th, 2017, 6:14pm

Yep. [hide]There is always one.[/hide]