How exactly do these non-subjective utilitarians evaluate consequences? As far as I knew up until now utiliarianism was a school of thought concerned with maximizing what people want, i.e. subjective. Robin Hanson <hanson@econ.berkeley.edu> wrote: : "Consequential libertarians" would be broader still, describing people who : like the consquences of liberty. "Utili-'" bothers me because I'm not clear : that everyone who uses it means to evaluate consequences from the point of : view of the people effected. "Subjective Utili-" would be clearer, but is : a bit ponderous.