This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
math214:04-01 [2020/03/31 23:16] pzhou |
math214:04-01 [2020/04/03 14:20] (current) pzhou |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
$$\nabla: \Omega^0(M, E) \to \Omega^1(M, E). $$ | $$\nabla: \Omega^0(M, E) \to \Omega^1(M, E). $$ | ||
In general, we define | In general, we define | ||
- | $$ \Omega^k(M, E) = C^\infty( \wedge^k(T^*E) \ot E) $$ | + | $$ \Omega^k(M, E) = C^\infty( \wedge^k(T^*M) \ot E) $$ |
as $k$-forms with coefficient in $E$. | as $k$-forms with coefficient in $E$. | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
==== Tensor, Hom and Dual ==== | ==== Tensor, Hom and Dual ==== | ||
Let $E_1, E_2$ be two vector bundles on $M$. Recall that we can define the following | Let $E_1, E_2$ be two vector bundles on $M$. Recall that we can define the following | ||
- | $$ E_1 \ot E_2, \quad \Hom(E_1, E_2), \quad | + | $$ E_1 \ot E_2, \quad \Hom(E_1, E_2) $$ |
- | as vector bundles on $M$, where the fiber satisfies $(E_1 \ot E_2)_p = (E_1)_p \ot (E_2)_p$ and $\Hom(E_1, E_2)_p = \Hom((E_1)_p, | + | as vector bundles on $M$, where the fiber satisfies $(E_1 \ot E_2)_p = (E_1)_p \ot (E_2)_p$ and $\Hom(E_1, E_2)_p = \Hom( (E_1)_p, (E_2)_p)$. We define the dual bundle of a vector bundle $E$ as $E^\vee := \Hom(E, \underline{\R})$ where |
$\underline{\R} = \R \times M$ is the trivial bundle. | $\underline{\R} = \R \times M$ is the trivial bundle. | ||