Lecture Notes

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: Course Notes » Math 214: Differentiable manifolds » Final
math214:final

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
math214:final [2020/05/06 12:29]
pzhou 		math214:final [2020/05/06 22:46] (current)
pzhou
Line 31: Line 31:
  
 5. (10 pt) Let $(M, g)$ be a Riemannian manifold, a closed geodesic is a geodesic $\gamma: [0, 1] \to M$ such that $\gamma(0)=\gamma(1)$ and $\dot \gamma(0) = \dot \gamma(1)$.  5. (10 pt) Let $(M, g)$ be a Riemannian manifold, a closed geodesic is a geodesic $\gamma: [0, 1] \to M$ such that $\gamma(0)=\gamma(1)$ and $\dot \gamma(0) = \dot \gamma(1)$. 
-  * (7 pt) Let $M$ be a genus $g\geq 1$ surface ((see wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genus_g_surface if the definition is unclear. )) and $g$ any smooth Riemannian metric. Is it true that there is always exists a closed geodesic on $M$? +  * (7 pt) Let $M$ be a genus $g\geq 1$ surface, smooth, compact without boundary, orientable 2-dimensional manifold ((see wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genus_g_surface)) and $g$ any smooth Riemannian metric. Is it true that there is always exists a closed geodesic on $M$? 
   * (3 pt) Let $M = S^2$ and $g$ any smooth Riemannian metric. Is it true that there is always exists a closed geodesic on $M$? Try your best to give an argument.  ((J. Franks proved that, if $S^2$ is equipped with a metric with positive Gaussian curvature, then there are infinitely many closed geodesics. Here we are asking for a much simpler version. ))    * (3 pt) Let $M = S^2$ and $g$ any smooth Riemannian metric. Is it true that there is always exists a closed geodesic on $M$? Try your best to give an argument.  ((J. Franks proved that, if $S^2$ is equipped with a metric with positive Gaussian curvature, then there are infinitely many closed geodesics. Here we are asking for a much simpler version. )) 
  
 6. (15 pt) Let $K \In \R^3$ be a knot, that is, a smooth embedded submanifold in $\R^3$ diffeomorphic to $S^1$.  6. (15 pt) Let $K \In \R^3$ be a knot, that is, a smooth embedded submanifold in $\R^3$ diffeomorphic to $S^1$. 
-  * (10 pt) Can you construct a geodesically complete metric on $M = \R^3 \RM K$? i.e. a metric  such that for any $p \in M$, $v \in T_p M$, the geodesics with initial condition $(p,v)$ exists for inifinite long time? Describe your construction explicitly. +  * (10 pt) Can you construct a geodesically complete metric ((For any point $p \in M$, the exponential map exists for the entire $T_p M$, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesic_manifold )) on $M = \R^3 \RM K$? i.e. a metric  such that for any $p \in M$, $v \in T_p M$, the geodesics with initial condition $(p,v)$ exists for inifinite long time? Describe your construction explicitly. 
   * (5 pt) Assume such metric exists, prove that for any point $p \in M$, there are infinitely many distinct geodesics $\gamma: [0,1] \to M$ with $\gamma(0)=\gamma(1)=p$.    * (5 pt) Assume such metric exists, prove that for any point $p \in M$, there are infinitely many distinct geodesics $\gamma: [0,1] \to M$ with $\gamma(0)=\gamma(1)=p$. 
  
math214/final.1588793373.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/05/06 12:29 by pzhou

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki