Unofficial results of Cardinal Classic VI follow:

Team	    W  L   Lost to			Comments
Cal A	   14  0   -----			One loss last two years total
Cal B      13  1   Cal A			
Vandy      11  3   Cal A/Cal B/Caltech A        Defending champion
BYU A      10  4   Cals/Caltech A/Vandy         Beat Stanford A head-to-head
Stanford A 10  4   Cals/BYU A/Vandy             Lost to BYU A head-to-head
Caltech A   9  5                                First tournament
Stanford B  7  7
Bowling Gr  7  7
Davis A     6  8

BYU B and Caltech B were 5-9 while Fresno A, Fresno B, Georgia State,
and Davis B rounded out the field.

In the semifinals, Cal A defeated Vanderbilt while Cal B defeated BYU.
In the finals, Cal B avenged its earlier loss by coming back in the
second half to beat Cal A.

Norm from BYU A was the top individual scorer with a 77-3 record.
Bryce from BYU B was second.

The Caltech squad was attending its first tournament and went 9-5,

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End of round-robin (pool of 15 teams):

1.  Berkeley A  (14-0)
2.  Berkeley B  (13-1)
3.  Vanderbilt  (11-3)
4.  BYU A	(10-4)

Semifinals:  Berkeley B def. Vanderbilt
	     Berkeley A def. BYU A

Finals:  Berkeley B def. Berkeley A


Personal observations:

BYU A played well, but they spread around their talent too much, putting
one of their best players, Bryce Inouye, on the B team, and stocking the A
team with only three players.  Had Bryce been on the A team, they very
well may have made the finals, possibly even winning the tournament.

Berkeley dominated the tournament utterly, as the win-loss record clearly
attests; the only time a Berkeley team lost was to another Berkeley team. 
Also, two of their best players, Jeff Newman and Matt Baker, weren't in
attendance.  ACF Nationals, look out!

Stanford's new generation of players looks very promising, especially
freshman Brad Harris.  Neophytes Caltech turned in some surprisingly
strong performances, but lost to some teams they really shouldn't have. 

The questions were not as well-edited as they had been at previous CC's;
point values were often mislabeled, extra words words were prevalent, and
there were too many knee-jerk questions (eg. "A person who collects
stamps is called a philatelist; what, FTP, is the name given to a person
who collects butterflies?")  On the bright side, there were few repeats,
and some packets were quite good.

Overall, the tournament went smoothly, despite some early snafus involving
Kinko's copy center.  First-time director Mark Ruzon did a fine job
keeping the day moving along.