10-5-00 thurs. bod minutes oct 5th bod mtg agenda ·gm report ·sm " ·old b -hostnames ·nb -csua coordination -eecs reservations -linux boxes start time: 7:15pm PDT. (GM repo) Patrick totally looked into the details of our financial state of being. "Wanna talk about money?" [chalkboard:] 17,500 -- allocation for year - 650 -- brochures - 1252 -- security for pc lockdowns - 3000 -- window tinting - 1800 -- pending for motion detector alarms for lab \__depending on our money Steve said we have money for the motion alarm, but other/higher priorities. Primrose said users supply their own paper (for printing). Akop stated that we will run out of paper soon [it's a daily occurrence actually] and we do not want people opening/closing the paper drawer of the printer all the time. Eugene added, "or pouring jamba juice down it" to which Andrew said, "out of colored ink." In summary, Steve wanted it locked, and Patrick said staff paper buyers need reimbursement. Due to A/C and other potential expenditures, he said we should host another career fair based on past successes, but to get staff motivated to help plan one seemed empirically difficult. In researching into ocf's accounting at asuc auxiliary, Patrick said we basically don't have any $30,000 eshleman master plan money left. Building the lab ate all monies we ever collected, and we still owe about $5,000 to asuc - which is being deferred (leaving us $7,000 this year). Same as six months ago, tom cordi of asuc auxiliary wants us to write and sign an MoU for the lab. this would be ocf's legal claim to its heller lab space. (SM Report) Akop said "we installed the Ultra1s on the weekend and it was a pain in the ass." Some of them are not working yet, and the hurricane IP is `taken' so "if someone could find and destroy it." (This was simply an ip we gave to an asuc emachine last semester and which we dhcp'd after the meeting.) Kennish is working on a cisco donation of switch(es). Eugene said eek should handle it; others said he'd only gotten junk magazines. Still, he did get us three (3) free corel wordperfect licenses (compared to callahan's one paid licensed box that arrived unmysteriously unwrapped and for which he is getting reimbursed). "didn't MS buy Corel?" A bigger issue is that it's too easy to power cycle the Ultra1s because they're all turned 90 degrees with the power button close to the mouse, and the monitors powersave, so people think they're turned off. It was decided signs should be made, likely by eek. The possibilities include `if you press this button you will get fucked up the ass' and did bem say that or who, i do not know. As for Norton ghost, akop said softdist does not have a campus license. Steve said it wasn't so essential for imaging, and primrose asked if we didn't have the gimp. Akop says win2k is different. Steve M asked if win2k was on plague yet ("callahan's" gateway; more on this later). "The fun part you've all been waiting for." Picking hostname scheme with which to name our ten gateway PCs. Calman wanted to name "his" gateway "baptism" which people deemed feelgood. Smcc said people shouldn't think of computers as their own for ego gratification. Ivan asked if formatting it would cure him. Smcc suggested we stick to a theme within our larger existing scheme (acts of god + pilot error; historical). So, the list of all suggested themes to date were read off, then people voted for the top 5 themes. Top 5 contenders: asteroid/climate, biological, transportation, software, things you might say in a disaster. Negative voting razed the field to two. Positive voting followed: Biological: ivan, akopps, drew, bem, gmg, wyc, cpfeyh (8) Tyms: ceugene, eek, bac, calman (4) Abs: jtsai, jshen (2; why?) Calman said he still wanted to name "his" machine, contravening the theme (biological) we'd just picked. He doesn't want "his" baby named "plague" (*.221). Eugene and ivan pointed out this defeats the point of the theme. Motion held to break the scheme for the his-box, defeated. (new business) csua coordination: smcc asked bem about it, nothing happened. Eecs reservations: more serious issue. Our MoU with eecs (they gave us money and machines) says 10-20 machines should be reserved exclusively for eecs student use. How would we distinguish eecs computers to lab users? And how technically could non-eecs people be kept off them? The MoU is thought to be purposely vague because despite their donations to us, EECS does not want to administrate these seats that are ostensibly soda south, and hence the vagueness. Or so steve believed the spirit of the MoU to be. Meeting closed 8:37pm PDT. Notes, summary, typing by kenao (!bodmember); finished 10:25pm PDT on 10/06/00.