wu :: forums « wu :: forums - Who has more sisters? » Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Feb 24th, 2024, 5:36am RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Help Search Members Login Register
 wu :: forums    riddles    medium (Moderators: Icarus, SMQ, Grimbal, Eigenray, ThudnBlunder, towr, william wu)    Who has more sisters? « Previous topic | Next topic »
 Pages: 1 2 Reply Notify of replies Send Topic Print
 Author Topic: Who has more sisters?  (Read 6107 times)
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Who has more sisters?   « on: Nov 29th, 2013, 9:05am » Quote Modify

On average, who has more sisters.   Boys or girls?
 IP Logged
antkor
Newbie

Posts: 30
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #1 on: Nov 29th, 2013, 9:45am » Quote Modify

Boys. And on average girls have more brothers.
 IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Some people are average, some are just mean.

Gender:
Posts: 13730
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #2 on: Nov 29th, 2013, 1:08pm » Quote Modify

 hidden: *Each family has two children *boys and girls are equally likely   So then, BB, BG, GB and GG are equally likely and representative of the population. The boys have two sisters, the girls have two sisters, both on average 1/2. So in this case it's a draw.   If boys and girls are not equally likely --- suppose we go so far as to say there is only one boy, then that one boy has a sister, and there's one girl without a sister, so then a boy has a very slightly higher average number of sisters (1 vs 1-) Vice versa, if there is only one girl, then that girl has no sister, and boys have a very small chance of having one, so the boys win in that case as well. (vs 0)   Ill founded conclusion: it's practically a draw, but only at one point is it actually a draw, and outside of that the boys win by a whisker.
 IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
antkor
Newbie

Posts: 30
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #3 on: Nov 29th, 2013, 1:21pm » Quote Modify

i disagree.
This riddle reminds me of the possibilities in another riddle where a man asks his friend about his children and one is a boy. In that case, the chance the 2nd being a girl is 2/3.
I think the riddle should be approached in a way that for a family with N children, one child is of known gender. Then, you start taking all the different combinations regarding all N children with the chosen child remaining constant and the other ones go in all possible combinations.
 IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Some people are average, some are just mean.

Gender:
Posts: 13730
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #4 on: Nov 30th, 2013, 1:41am » Quote Modify

I'm not sure what you disagree with, considering I reach the same conclusion as you and declare at the outset my assumptions are bad (unless you disagree they're bad  ), but I disagree we should assume one child has a known gender, because if we're talking of a specific family why does the question ask for an average?

The question seems quite plain to me: Is sum(#sister foreach boy in world)/#(boys in world) greater/equal/less than  sum(#sister foreach girl in world)/#(girls in world)
So it's just a bit of demographics. And the puzzle is finding the data or a reasonable model. (Or an unreasonable model that can tell you some bounds.)
 IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #5 on: Nov 30th, 2013, 3:10am » Quote Modify

My idea is that girls have more sisters than boys have.
Actually, they also have more brothers than boys have.
 IP Logged
rmsgrey
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 2872
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #6 on: Nov 30th, 2013, 7:35am » Quote Modify

If you assume that, for any given parent, the genders of their children are statistically independent, then for any given child, the genders of their siblings (if any) are statistically independent of each other and of that child's gender.

So, on average, they'd be equal.

If they're not statistically independent, then it depends which way the bias goes - if siblings are more likely to be the other gender, then boys have more sisters; if they're more likely to be the same gender, then girls do.

There are differences between male and female sperm that the female body can use to favour one over the other, so certain differences in the mother's body chemistry mean that one family is more likely to have daughters, while another is more likely to have sons. I'm also told there's a statistical tendency for first children to be boys and later children girls. The former effect favours girls having more sisters; the latter boys, and I have no data on the relative scales of the two effects.

@towr: you neglect the cases where there are no girls, or no boys - effectively introducing a slight bias in favour of mixed gender siblings.
 IP Logged
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #7 on: Dec 2nd, 2013, 2:50am » Quote Modify

Here is my reasoning.

The rule that held in China until recently is that you can have only one child.  If that child is a girl, you can have a second child.

Assuming each couple gets all the children they can, out of 4 families, on average, 2 have one boy, 1 has a girl and a boy and 1 has two girls.  {B, B, GB, GG}
Among these children, 2 girls out of 3 have a sister, but only 1 boy out of 3 has a sister.

Since China is such a big country, and the imbalance is quite large, I would believe it tips the balance for the world population.

Funnily, in the above situation, girls also have more brothers than boys.  Girls have 1/3 brother on average, boys have none.
 « Last Edit: Dec 2nd, 2013, 3:05am by Grimbal » IP Logged
antkor
Newbie

Posts: 30
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #8 on: Dec 2nd, 2013, 6:46am » Quote Modify

Grimbal I agree that since China has a population over 1M, it can be a good representation for the whole population on earth. However, there is something I don't understand very well. The fact that law enforces/affects the births and the gender of the children a family can have is introduced by government. I mean introducing a human factor isn't a way of having bias towards a gender of the two (in this case boys)? Would that be acceptable? Wouldn't it be more accurate if the calculations are based only on the number and the gender of the children a family may have? If this bias is acceptable how would you justify your opinion? Would you include all factors that would affect births within your experimental conditions?
 IP Logged
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #9 on: Dec 2nd, 2013, 7:36am » Quote Modify

I never said human factors introduce a bias towards a gender or the other.

The way it works is that the regulations introduce a correlation between the sex of the first child and the size of the family.  Therefore girls live in larger families and therefore have more brothers and more sisters.

There are other factors which I don't know.  That is why I said "I would believe that..." and not "It is proven that...".

 IP Logged
rmsgrey
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 2872
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #10 on: Dec 2nd, 2013, 7:41am » Quote Modify

on Dec 2nd, 2013, 6:46am, antkor wrote:
 Grimbal I agree that since China has a population over 1M, it can be a good representation for the whole population on earth. However, there is something I don't understand very well. The fact that law enforces/affects the births and the gender of the children a family can have is introduced by government. I mean introducing a human factor isn't a way of having bias towards a gender of the two (in this case boys)? Would that be acceptable? Wouldn't it be more accurate if the calculations are based only on the number and the gender of the children a family may have? If this bias is acceptable how would you justify your opinion? Would you include all factors that would affect births within your experimental conditions?

The Chinese law doesn't (directly) affect the gender ratio of births, but it does affect the division of those births into families - in every two-child family, the elder child is a girl.

There may be a reverse bias from Chinese parents taking steps to ensure that their second child is a boy, but it would have to be strongly expressed to offset the natural 2:1 advantage girls possess.
 IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Some people are average, some are just mean.

Gender:
Posts: 13730
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #11 on: Dec 2nd, 2013, 10:33am » Quote Modify

According to wikipedia: "The sex ratio at birth (between male and female births) in mainland China reached 117:100  and remained steady between 2000 and 2013"
Though it's still a question where this bias falls. You'd think the first child doesn't matter much if they can have a second when it's a girl (unless they can only afford one financially). If so, there is a pretty strong bias to ensure the second child is a brother (I get ~ 61%).

I'm also not sure we can just ignore the rest of the world. And we have to consider the one-child policy only applies to a third of the Chinese.
 « Last Edit: Dec 2nd, 2013, 10:36am by towr » IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #12 on: Dec 4th, 2013, 5:55am » Quote Modify

Indeed, if the second child is always a boy, then only boys have sisters.  I calculated that if the bias is on both children, you need a ratio of 0.618 boys per birth (the golden ratio) to make the number of sisters equal between boys and girls.  If the bias is on the second child only, you need a ratio of 2/3.

But clearly, the pressure for boys reduces the difference I found in the number of sisters (the 2/3 for girls vs. 1/3 for boys).
 IP Logged
Uberpuzzler

Posts: 1026
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #13 on: Dec 5th, 2013, 7:42pm » Quote Modify

Beautiful question, Grimbal.

If a brother has as many brothers as sisters and a sister has twice as many brothers as sisters how many brothers and sisters are there in this family?

Let B be the number of brothers and S be the number of sisters in that family. Translating brother has as many brothers as sisters from English into algebraic we get:

B - 1 = S

Why minus one? Because a brother who has brothers is also a brother to other brothers and must be counted out. Translating sister has twice as many brothers as sisters from English into algebraic we get:

2*(S - 1) = B

Why minus one? Because a sister who has sisters is also a sister to other sisters and must be counted out. Solving this system of equations we get that B = 4 and S = 3.

The reason I introduced this goofy sub puzzle is to see what happens if the number of brothers and sisters becomes the same. Say it's 3. Then each of 3 brothers has 3 sisters. But, according to Grimbal's question, each of 3 sisters has only 2 sisters. And so on for any N. Please tell me if I am failing my English again.

If not then it seems that to answer Grimbal's question properly we have to realize that:

1). It discriminates against only one variable and as such
2). A girl can not be her own sister (unless you are shooting a comedy in which case your heroine when asked if she is her sister's mother will say yes) and hence we have these primitive cases:

if N(brothers) > N(sisters) -> boys
if N(brothers) == N(sisters) -> boys
if N(brothers) + 1 == N(sisters) -> neither
if N(brothers) + 2 <= N(sisters) -> girls

Was too tired last night, dangers of trying to think after you've been writing code all day. This morning I realized that it's not the number of brothers but the number of sisters that matters. Say there's 1 brother and 10 sisters. 1 brother can claim all 10 females as his sisters. But each sister can claim only 9 females as her sisters. 10 > 9, boys. So it looks like as long as there at least one male and one female offspring its boys (B is the number of boys, G is the number of girls):

default is neither
if B > 0
if G > 0
boys
else if B == 0
if G > 0
girls
[/edit]

These must be fed further into statistical and probabilistic analysis - your turf.

This was a look at the problem through the microscope. In the next post if you don't mind I will look at it through the telescope. Both posts should be probably read at the same time.
 « Last Edit: Dec 6th, 2013, 8:28am by rloginunix » IP Logged
Uberpuzzler

Posts: 1026
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #14 on: Dec 5th, 2013, 8:15pm » Quote Modify

With Grimbal's permission I will generalize his question by finishing it thus "... over long term across many species" (rabbits have brothers and sisters too).

Why boys and girls exist in the first place?

Earth is about 3.5-4 billion years old. The first sexual intercourse defined as exchange of genetic material happened a couple of billion years ago (scientific speculation not a proven fact) between two primitive cells swimming in primordial soup. The first sperm and egg intercourse happened (scientific fact) 600 million years ago at the bottom of the ocean between corals. So mother nature invented two genders and a sexual reproduction because it provides the variance of the genetic material which helps the species fight the bad things off - viruses, etc.

There are exceptions of course. There's this lizard dwelling in the deserts of New Mexico, US, that manages to reproduce via eggs. All species are females. Consequently all daughters are identical clones of their mothers. Which may be a good thing. But if they get hit with some disease that their genes can't fight off - they are doomed.

So the little brothers and sisters of today become mommies and daddies of tomorrow. And there is a rather hard statistical metric out there called Average Fertility Rate (AFR). If AFR == 2.1 then mommy and daddy produce future mommy and daddy which produce future mommy and daddy, etc. and the population of species is stable. If AFR < 2.1 population is dwindling down. If AFR > 2.1 population grows.

So my reasoning is that unlike imagining flipping a coin many many times trying to understand what an infinity is we have a sort of historical luxury to witness this very long and very statistically significant experiment - nature says majority of species have boys and girls and the AFR must be 2.1 for the population to at least not die out.

So:
if AFR == 2.1
boys
else
depends - see table from previous post.
 IP Logged
Junior Member

Posts: 57
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #15 on: May 23rd, 2014, 3:27pm » Quote Modify

The theoretical distribution shows that it is equal as to who would have more sisters.  This can be shown using induction.

But just to start the proof:

N=number of children in household

N=1
Either it is a
Boy with no sisters
Girl with no sisters
Equal

N=2
Either it is
2 Boys (No sisters)
2 Girls (each girl has 1 sister) 25% likely
1 Boy 1 Girl (Boys have 1 sister)  50% likely
Equal

N=3
Either it is
3 Boys (No sisters) p=1/8
2 Boys 1 Girl (boys have 1 sister) p=3/8
1 Boy 2 girl (Boy has 2 sisters, Girls have 1 sister) p=3/8
3 Sisters (girl has 2 sisters) p=1/8
equal

and so on
 « Last Edit: May 23rd, 2014, 3:30pm by BMAD » IP Logged
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #16 on: May 23rd, 2014, 4:01pm » Quote Modify

You assume that the decision to have one more child is independent of the sex of the existing child or children.  This assumption is not valid.
 IP Logged
Junior Member

Posts: 57
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #17 on: May 23rd, 2014, 4:24pm » Quote Modify

I only assume that a pregnant woman has a 50/50 shot to have either a girl or a boy.

But I do acknowledge that I am ignoring many cultures mores on male preference.
 « Last Edit: May 23rd, 2014, 4:25pm by BMAD » IP Logged
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #18 on: May 24th, 2014, 4:22am » Quote Modify

The assumption that a child has equal chances to be male or female is not enough.
If, as it was the case in China, it is forbidden to have a second child if the first is a boy the odds change.  You will never have a 2-boy family.
The odds for N=2 become:
boy-boy 0%, boy-girl 0%, girl-boy 50%, girl-girl 50%.
In this case, a boy always has 1 sister, a girl has 2/3 chances to have 1 sister, 2/3 sisters on average.
 IP Logged
Junior Member

Posts: 57
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #19 on: May 24th, 2014, 7:03am » Quote Modify

I think we are having a theoretical vs empirical discussion.   I am saying that biologically it should be balanced.  Obviously by practice humans skew the odds.
 IP Logged
rmsgrey
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 2872
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #20 on: May 26th, 2014, 7:17am » Quote Modify

on May 24th, 2014, 4:22am, Grimbal wrote:
 The assumption that a child has equal chances to be male or female is not enough. If, as it was the case in China, it is forbidden to have a second child if the first is a boy the odds change.  You will never have a 2-boy family. The odds for N=2 become: boy-boy 0%, boy-girl 0%, girl-boy 50%, girl-girl 50%. In this case, a boy always has 1 sister, a girl has 2/3 chances to have 1 sister, 2/3 sisters on average.

But how many 1-child single girl families are there compared to the number of one-child single boys?

If you assume that all families have a second child if possible, and no families have a third child, then, in 4 families, there are 3 boys with 1 sister between them and 3 girls with 2 sisters between them.
 IP Logged
dudiobugtron
Uberpuzzler

Posts: 735
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #21 on: May 26th, 2014, 3:21pm » Quote Modify

on Dec 2nd, 2013, 2:50am, Grimbal wrote:
 Assuming each couple gets all the children they can, out of 4 families, on average, 2 have one boy, 1 has a girl and a boy and 1 has two girls.  {B, B, GB, GG} Among these children, 2 girls out of 3 have a sister, but only 1 boy out of 3 has a sister.

 IP Logged
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #22 on: May 30th, 2014, 3:41am » Quote Modify

And yet I forgot it in my last post...

Inded, you have to consider all families, it doesn't mean much to compare boys and girls in just 2-child families.
 IP Logged
EdwardSmith
Junior Member

Posts: 61
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #23 on: Jul 16th, 2014, 12:22am » Quote Modify

I think the question being asked is :-
If a couple have a girl child, does it make it more likely that their next child is a girl.
I think the answer to this is yes.
So therefore Girls have more sisters.
Its more biology than maths.
 IP Logged

Schottland Pension
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler

Gender:
Posts: 7526
 Re: Who has more sisters?   « Reply #24 on: Jul 16th, 2014, 5:53am » Quote Modify

To be precise, what I meant is:
If you compute
a = the average number of sisters over all boys of the planet
and
b =  the average number of sisters over all girls of the planet,
which one of a and b is largest?
 IP Logged
 Pages: 1 2 Reply Notify of replies Send Topic Print

 Forum Jump: ----------------------------- riddles -----------------------------  - easy => medium   - hard   - what am i   - what happened   - microsoft   - cs   - putnam exam (pure math)   - suggestions, help, and FAQ   - general problem-solving / chatting / whatever ----------------------------- general -----------------------------  - guestbook   - truth   - complex analysis   - wanted   - psychology   - chinese « Previous topic | Next topic »