wu :: forums
wu :: forums - HARD: Cigarettes Max Clique

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 26th, 2018, 8:01am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   hard
(Moderators: towr, Eigenray, Icarus, william wu, ThudnBlunder, SMQ, Grimbal)
   HARD: Cigarettes Max Clique
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: HARD: Cigarettes Max Clique  (Read 39099 times)
Nigel_Parsons
Junior Member
**





   


Gender: male
Posts: 63
Re: HARD: Cigarettes Max Clique  
« Reply #25 on: Jun 17th, 2004, 11:19am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

'Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions' by Martin Gardner has it as 'The Touching Cigarettes'. with the answer given away by being illustrated on the cover (U.K. edition at least)
 
UK edition is Penguin books ISBN 014 02 0713 9
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13601
Re: HARD: Cigarettes Max Clique  
« Reply #26 on: Jun 18th, 2004, 12:25am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Is there any proof in it that that's the definite answer?
Cause I thought 'the' answer was unknown (unproven)..
« Last Edit: Jun 18th, 2004, 12:35am by towr » IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: HARD: Cigarettes Max Clique  
« Reply #27 on: Jun 18th, 2004, 3:53am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jun 18th, 2004, 12:25am, towr wrote:
Is there any proof in it that that's the definite answer?
Cause I thought 'the' answer was unknown (unproven)..

At least in the first edition of the book (some 30 years ago), it was not proven. Moreover, it was a kind of surprise for the author that 7 is possible.
« Last Edit: Jun 18th, 2004, 4:19am by Barukh » IP Logged
Jayaram
Guest

Email

Re: HARD: Cigarettes Max Clique  
« Reply #28 on: Aug 9th, 2004, 4:27am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

Sorry for playing the fool - but isn't the question about infinite length cigarettes irrelevant?  By definition, PARALLEL LINES ARE DEFINED AS LINES THAT MEET AT INFINITY.  So, can't we just assume that infinite length cigarettes all meet at infinity (I know that the argument is ambiguous, but isn't that the very definition for parallel lines?
IP Logged
Jack Huizenga
Guest

Email

Re: HARD: Cigarettes Max Clique  
« Reply #29 on: Aug 9th, 2004, 9:43pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

Parallel lines don't "by definition" meet at "infinity".  It all depends on what type of geometry you are using.  In standard Euclidean geometry, which is the geometry that nearly every "real life" question is worded in, parallel lines by definition never meet.  Also, in Euclidean geometry there is no notion of infinity.  I believe you are confusing projective geometry with Euclidean geometry.
 
On another note, keep in mind that we are working in three dimensions.  When working in three dimensions, one can't conclude that two arbitrary lines either intersect or are parallel like one can in two dimensions.
IP Logged
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board