Author 
Topic: A small hint re: 2008 A4 (Read 8218 times) 

Mickey1
Junior Member
Gender:
Posts: 116


A small hint re: 2008 A4
« on: Mar 24^{th}, 2011, 7:13am » 
Quote Modify

In the 2008 exam, problem A4 f(x) = x if x =< e and xf(ln x) if x > e. How is the second equality, f(x)= xf(ln (x)) solved? In the published solution on the archive it seems to be so selfevident that it doesn't require any explanation. Grateful for a hint

« Last Edit: Mar 24^{th}, 2011, 7:23am by Mickey1 » 
IP Logged 



towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730


Re: A small hint 2008 A4
« Reply #1 on: Mar 24^{th}, 2011, 9:40am » 
Quote Modify

It's a definition, so it's not solved, but evaluated. You just reapply the definition until you have a value. f(100) = 100 f( ln(100) ) .. f( ln(100) ) = ln(100) f( ln( ln(100) ) ) .. .. ln( ln(100) ) < e, so f( ln(ln(100)) ) = ln( ln(100) ) .. f( ln(100) ) = ln(100) ln( ln(100) ) f(100) = 100 ln(100) ln( ln(100) ) ~= 703.292208

« Last Edit: Mar 24^{th}, 2011, 9:42am by towr » 
IP Logged 
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB



Mickey1
Junior Member
Gender:
Posts: 116


Re: A small hint 2008 A4
« Reply #2 on: Mar 25^{th}, 2011, 2:53pm » 
Quote Modify

Thank you. Something similar actually came to me during the night, and I was thinking about f (exp(x)) = exp(x)*f (ln(exp(x)))= exp(x)*x*f(x) = exp(x)*x*f(ln(x)) = exp(x)*x * f(product(lnk times (x)) , k=1 to N), until lnN times (x) < e, and that is when you have the solution. I realize the exp(x) approach is not necessary but it helps to get you started. I meant to visit the riddle site about that but I had to sit all day in an emergency response bunker looking at dose rates from the Fukushima reactors, so I can't prove it. Anyway, now the solution also makes sense. PS These Putnam exams seem to be more difficult than the IMO problems. They seem to require more of the participants.


IP Logged 



ThudnBlunder
Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489


Re: A small hint 2008 A4
« Reply #3 on: Mar 25^{th}, 2011, 7:41pm » 
Quote Modify

on Mar 24^{th}, 2011, 9:40am, towr wrote:It's a definition, so it's not solved, but evaluated. You just reapply the definition until you have a value. 
 Then f(x) = f(x+1)/x is also a 'definition'; but f(x) can be expressed in terms of x, namely (x).


IP Logged 
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.



towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730


Re: A small hint 2008 A4
« Reply #4 on: Mar 26^{th}, 2011, 1:39am » 
Quote Modify

True enough; you can often express the function differently, sometimes simpler. And admittedly it's not always as simple as recursively applying the definition to evaluate the function at a given point (because that depends on the kind of definition). But the point is it's not an equation to be solved, you're not looking for the conditions under which both sides are equal. Looking at the problem from the wrong perspective just makes it more difficult to understand. Aside from that, shouldn't you include f(x) != 0 as part of the definition in your example if you want f(x) to be Gamma(x) ?


IP Logged 
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB



Mickey1
Junior Member
Gender:
Posts: 116


Re: A small hint 2008 A4
« Reply #5 on: Mar 26^{th}, 2011, 4:12am » 
Quote Modify

Moving on to closed forms, I found this on the internet An expression is a closedform expression if it can be expressed in terms of a bounded number of elementary functions. Informally is it in apposition to a recurrence relation, which defines a sequence of term from earlier terms in that sequence. My question is If N! is not a closed form then how can Gamma(N) or Gamma (x) deserve this adjective? Would you agree that N! is not a closed form and what does this imply for Gamma(N)? It seems that the integration concept hides something and allows the integral to pose as simple, masking a complicated perhaps nonclosed procedure.


IP Logged 



ThudnBlunder
Uberpuzzler
The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea
Gender:
Posts: 4489


Re: A small hint 2008 A4
« Reply #6 on: Mar 26^{th}, 2011, 9:32am » 
Quote Modify

Mickey, you might find this post useful.

« Last Edit: Mar 26^{th}, 2011, 2:01pm by ThudnBlunder » 
IP Logged 
THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.



Mickey1
Junior Member
Gender:
Posts: 116


Re: A small hint 2008 A4
« Reply #7 on: Mar 27^{th}, 2011, 12:57pm » 
Quote Modify

That was interesting. Definitionrelated research unfolding as a row between two professors. I was surprised that, of all people, mathematicians did not seem to have stricter definitions for these things.


IP Logged 



