wu :: forums
wu :: forums - MATHEMATICS

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 26th, 2021, 4:03pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   putnam exam (pure math)
(Moderators: william wu, Eigenray, Grimbal, towr, SMQ, Icarus)
   MATHEMATICS
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: MATHEMATICS  (Read 8042 times)
DOUBELL
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 3
MATHEMATICS  
« on: Sep 1st, 2011, 8:45am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

CAN SOMEONE PROVE BY Mathematical induction that (2r)^3 = 2 (n^2) (n+1)^2 . need help with this one.
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13729
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #1 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 8:52am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I think you may have stated the problem incorrectly or incompletely. Since there seem to be no constraints on the values of r and n the two sides are plainly not equal for all values of n and r.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
DOUBELL
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 3
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #2 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 9:11am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

it is fact correct since for r=1  the LHs is (2)^3 = 8  
AND FOR N =1 THE RIGHT HAND SIDE IS 2(1^2) (1+1)^2= 2 (2)^2 = 8.
IP Logged
pex
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 880
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #3 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 11:41am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I cannot find any other integer solutions than
r=0, n=-1
r=0, n=0
r=1, n=-2
r=1, n=1.
I don't see what mathematical induction could have to do with it, except perhaps in proving that there are no other solutions (or that there are, but I missed them).
IP Logged
ThudnBlunder
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #4 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:22pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Maybe LHS should be (2n3)
IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
pex
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 880
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #5 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:31pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 1st, 2011, 12:22pm, ThudnBlunder wrote:
Maybe LHS should be (2n3)

I am impressed by your mind-reading skills!
IP Logged
ThudnBlunder
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #6 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:42pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 1st, 2011, 12:31pm, pex wrote:

I am impressed by your mind-reading skills!

Thank you, pex. [fingernail_polishing_smiley]
« Last Edit: Sep 1st, 2011, 4:01pm by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13729
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #7 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:52pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Ah, then it makes sense
 
base case,
0..0 (2r)3 = 0 = 2 * 02 * (0+1)2
 
induction under assumption it's true for every natural number smaller than n:
0..n (2r)3
= {move last term from sum}
0..n-1 (2r)3 + (2n)3
= {invoke induction hypothesis}
2 * n2 * (n-1)2 + 8n * n2
= {regroup terms}
2 * ((n-1)2 + 4n) * n2
= {simplify}
2 * n2 * (n+1)2
« Last Edit: Sep 1st, 2011, 12:54pm by towr » IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
DOUBELL
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 3
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #8 on: Sep 1st, 2011, 1:52pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 1st, 2011, 12:22pm, ThudnBlunder wrote:
Maybe LHS should be (2n3)

 
THAT IS IN FACT CORRECT ABOUT THE LEFT HAND SIDE
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #9 on: Feb 29th, 2012, 9:53pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Gee. One might ask if induction is valid within an
induction argument itself. What you do think?
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Jack Hadin
Newbie
*





   


Gender: male
Posts: 2
Re: MATHEMATICS  
« Reply #10 on: Oct 29th, 2012, 11:13am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I think you have recorded the problem wrongly or perhaps incompletely. Because on a search engine appear to be no constraints throughout the principles of r along with n the two sides tend to be plainly not equal for every one of the principles of n also as r.
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board