|
||
Title: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by Obob on Dec 19th, 2006, 2:02pm A tournament on n vertices is some orientation of the edges of the complete graph on n vertices. So for any two vertices v and w, exactly one of v->w or w->v holds (we write v->w to mean there is a directed edge from v to w). An automorphism of a directed graph is a bijection of the vertices which preserves the oriented edges. Prove that the automorphism group of a tournament is solvable. |
||
Title: Re: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by Eigenray on Dec 19th, 2006, 3:40pm With or without [hide]Feit-Thompson[/hide]? |
||
Title: Re: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by Obob on Dec 19th, 2006, 7:30pm That's a good question, Eigenray. So good, in fact, that I invite you to answer it yourself. |
||
Title: Re: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by flamingdragon on Dec 19th, 2006, 10:06pm lol, thats a great statement, I think I should start quoting it. ;) Giving no credit to you of course. ;D |
||
Title: Re: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by ecoist on Dec 20th, 2006, 9:28am My opinion is worth what you are paying for it, but I suspect there is no "high school" solution. For, [hide]given any group G of odd order, there are tournaments T (with both even and odd numbers of vertices) whose automorphism group contains G.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by Obob on Dec 20th, 2006, 1:55pm Exactly, ecoist. So, [hide]this statement and the Feit-Thompson theorem are EQUIVALENT.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by Pietro K.C. on Jan 30th, 2007, 3:47pm Just to clarify, is this the expected solution? I make liberal use of Feit-Thompson, which alas, despite some promising false starts, I have been unable to prove in the last couple of days. ::) [hide] I claim that the automorphism group G of any tournament T has odd order. Suppose G has even order. Then there is an f in G of order 2 (Sylow). That is, f != id and f^2 = id. Since f != 1, there must be a vextex u of T which f moves. Let f(u) = v. Then f(v) = u. But this reverses the direction of the arrow between u and v, which is incompatible with the definition of graph automorphism. Therefore G has odd order, and is solvable by F-T. [/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by Obob on Jan 30th, 2007, 4:23pm Yes, that is correct Pietro. The interesting thing is that [hide]Feit-Thompson is essentially necessary for the proof.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Automorphism group of a directed graph. Post by Icarus on Jan 30th, 2007, 7:20pm Of course, since Feit-Thompson is a theorem, every other theorem is equivalent to it. You can prove this without using Feit-Thompson, but essentially you do this by building the proof of Feit-Thompson inside your own proof. As a side-point, beyond Eigenray's initial post, hiding the text is fairly pointless. Everyone who reads that far down is going to be highlighting any hidden text. |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |