|
||
Title: Given subgroup H maximal non-normal in some group? Post by ecoist on Apr 12th, 2007, 10:58am Let H be a finite group of order greater than 1. Show that there exists a finite group G in which H ia a maximal, non-normal subgroup of G. |
||
Title: Re: Given subgroup H maximal non-normal in some gr Post by Eigenray on Apr 12th, 2007, 4:29pm Let N be a maximal normal subgroup of H (possibly trivial). Then S = H/N is simple. (1) If S is abelian, say S = Zp for some prime p. Pick a prime q =1 mod p, and let G = Zq http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/rtimes.gif H, using H -> S -> Aut(Zq), where the first map is projection, and the second takes S to the unique subgroup of Aut(Zq) = Zq* of order p. Then the composition is non-trival, so H is non-normal, and since it has prime index, it's maximal. (2) If S is non-abelian, then let G = S http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/rtimes.gif H, where H acts on S=H/N by conjugation, i.e., using http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/phi.gif: H -> S -> Inn(S) -> Aut(S). Since S is non-abelian, this composition is non-trivial, so H is non-normal. Suppose H http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif K http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif G. Since K contains H, we have K = T x H as sets, for some subset T of S. But then T is actually a subgroup of S, and in fact normal: K is normalized by H, so T is invariant under http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/phi.gif(H) = Inn(S). Since S is simple, we must have T=1 or S, i.e., K=H or G, and so H is maximal. |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |