Author |
Topic: Complex lines in three dimensions (Read 2500 times) |
|
Benoit_Mandelbrot
Junior Member
Almost doesn't count.
Gender:
Posts: 133
|
|
Complex lines in three dimensions
« on: Jan 15th, 2004, 9:56am » |
Quote Modify
|
I've been anylizing the connection between complex numbers and functions, and I've found a way to plot complex numbers in three dimensions. This would be a 3d parametric function [t,real(f(t)),imag(f(t))]. The z-axis would introduce the imaginary part of the output number, adding three dimensions to functions. This would be a curved line, not a surface. Update: OOps! my bad! I ment to put in the functions, but I must have like not somehow.
|
« Last Edit: Jan 16th, 2004, 8:44am by Benoit_Mandelbrot » |
IP Logged |
Because of modulo, different bases, and significant digits, all numbers equal each other!
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Complex lines in three dimensions
« Reply #1 on: Jan 15th, 2004, 1:21pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I don't really see much of an advantage over simply plotting the real and imaginary part seperately in a 2D plot. Not in the last place because our screens are still not 3D (unlike what sci-fi has been promissing us for years) Going into the 3D dimension would be more helpfull for plotting [bbc] to [bbc] functions though, since I'd be hard pressed to put the input on one axis in this case. so we'd have [Re(x), Im(x), Re(f(x))] and [Re(x), Im(x), Im(f(x))] in the same plot. This however would give two surfaces.. (But that's to be expected with a two dimensional input)
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: Complex lines in three dimensions
« Reply #2 on: Jan 15th, 2004, 4:41pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but I don't see what your point is here. If I understand you correctly (if t has real and imaginary parts, you can't plot it as one of your three coordinates like you show), what you are actually talking about is graphing a function f : [bbr] [to] [bbc] : t [mapsto] f(t) as the 3D-curve {(t, re(f(t)), im(f(t))) | t [in] [bbr] }. Despite towr's doubts, there are times when it is handy to plot curves into [bbc] this way rather than as a parametric curve in the plane. But this is hardly new. People have been doing exactly this practically from the days of DeCartes.
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ... And e is just as cursed. I wonder: Which is larger When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
Benoit_Mandelbrot
Junior Member
Almost doesn't count.
Gender:
Posts: 133
|
|
Re: Complex lines in three dimensions
« Reply #3 on: Jan 16th, 2004, 8:47am » |
Quote Modify
|
Yea, I ment to do [t,real(f(t)),imag(f(t))], not to do the silly one I did before. Hey, I'm only 18 and still in high school. I don't have a phd in mathematics just yet, so I don't know everything about math.
|
« Last Edit: May 3rd, 2004, 9:28am by Benoit_Mandelbrot » |
IP Logged |
Because of modulo, different bases, and significant digits, all numbers equal each other!
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: Complex lines in three dimensions
« Reply #4 on: Jan 16th, 2004, 3:26pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Unfortunately it's true that just about every simple good idea someone else has already had some time before. Math grows at the edges. It's extremely rare to come across something undone in the middle. But I asked because I was unsure that I had interpreted your comments correctly.
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ... And e is just as cursed. I wonder: Which is larger When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
|