wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Exam Sham? »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 2nd, 2024, 10:24pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   general problem-solving / chatting / whatever
(Moderators: Icarus, ThudnBlunder, Eigenray, william wu, Grimbal, towr, SMQ)
   Exam Sham?
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Exam Sham?  (Read 688 times)
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Exam Sham?  
« on: Nov 12th, 2003, 11:55am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

A rather 'interesting' question featured recently on a GCSE Mathematics statistics module (14-16 year olds in England).
 
(only the essence of the question is presented to avoid publication copyrights)
 
A class consists of 10 boys and 18 girls. A teacher wishes to take a stratified sample of four pupils. Calculate the number of boys and the number of girls that should be chosen.
 


We proceed by finding 10/28 and 18/28 of 4:
10/28 x 4 ~= 1.43
18/28 x 4 ~= 2.57
 
So how many of each do we take?
 
It seems there are two possible answers:
(i) Round and take 1 boy and 3 girl. However, this is in the ratio 1:3 and the original distribution was not even in the ratio 1:2.
(ii) Take a closer approximation to the ratios and select 2 boys and 2 girls, but then we're ignoring the estimated proportions.
 
 
The (published) solution in the mark scheme gave the answer as 1:3.
 
I personally think that it is a very bad question, and I believe that the answer should be 2:2. My understanding of the method of taking statified samples is to first estimate by finding proportions, then modify groups to ensure that the total matches the desired sample size. This is done by increasing/decreasing groups that most/least 'deserve' it. Ultimately, the final values should reflect the original distribution as closely as possible.
 
I'd be pleased to hear any thoughts on this.
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
visitor
Guest

Email

Re: Exam Sham?  
« Reply #1 on: Nov 12th, 2003, 12:13pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

As there is no "good" answer, I think the test answer was as close as possible. The boys comprise 35.7% of the total. You have a choice of increasing that percentage 14.3% to a 2:2 ratio or decreasing it 10.7% to a 1:3 ratio. The "correct" answer is the closer of the two.
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Exam Sham?  
« Reply #2 on: Nov 12th, 2003, 7:27pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

This is known as apportionment, the same problem that comes up when distributing, say, seats in the House of Representatives here in the States: each state receives an integral number of seats in direct proportion to its population.
Various methods and associated paradoxes are described here.
Unfortunately, the simplest method has several flaws: for example, increasing the total number of seats, or one state's population, can cause it to actually lose seats.
Hamilton's, Jefferson's, Webster's, and the Huntington-Hill method all give 1 boy and 3 girls, while Adams' gives 2 boys and 2 girls.
IP Logged
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Exam Sham?  
« Reply #3 on: Nov 13th, 2003, 12:37am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Thank you both very much for your feedback. That link, Eigenray, was most interesting and very helpful. Cheers!
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board