wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Prove a Congruence Without Group Theory »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 4th, 2024, 6:07am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   putnam exam (pure math)
(Moderators: towr, Icarus, william wu, Eigenray, Grimbal, SMQ)
   Prove a Congruence Without Group Theory
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Prove a Congruence Without Group Theory  (Read 537 times)
ecoist
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 405
Prove a Congruence Without Group Theory  
« on: Dec 31st, 2006, 7:16pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Many years ago I read a remarkable proof of the Sylow theorems that had these interesting byproducts:
 
(G) Let G be a group of order n divisible by pk, for some prime p.  Then the number of subgroups of G of order pk (conjugate or not) is congruent to 1 modulo p.
 
(C) Let C(x,y) be the number of y-subsets of an x-set.  let p be a prime and n a positive integer such that pk divides n.  Then C(n-1,pk-1) is congruent to 1 modulo p.
 
(G) was proved by showing that, modulo p, every group of order n has the same number of subgroups of order pk as the cyclic group of order n, which number is, of course, 1.  Hence both (G) and (C) follow.  What's a proof of (C) without using group theory?
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: Prove a Congruence Without Group Theory  
« Reply #1 on: Jan 2nd, 2007, 5:46am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Lucas's theorem?
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: Prove a Congruence Without Group Theory  
« Reply #2 on: Jan 3rd, 2007, 3:45am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

More specifically: use this identity, which may be derived from this.
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Prove a Congruence Without Group Theory  
« Reply #3 on: Jan 3rd, 2007, 4:55pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Writing n=qm for some m, where q=pk, we have, mod p,
 
(1+x)n-1 = (1+x)q-1(1+x)q(m-1) = (1+x)q-1(1+xq)m-1,
 
and the coefficient of xq-1 on the right is just 1.  (The proof of the more general Lucas's theorem is similar.)
 
Alternatively, C(n-1, q-1) is the product, for 0<i<q, of (n-i)/(q-i).  But i = prj, where r<k, so mod p, we have
 
(n-i)/(q-i) = (mpk-r-j)/(pk-r-j) = (-j)/(-j) = 1.
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board