I said this in person before, but: Being more conservative is not the same thing as being more libertarian. This probably means Mayor Dean is also less libertarian on social issues. Specifically, I know she supported an anti-pan-handling ordinance which limited the freedom of speech. Unfortunately a city government is not merely an economic entity. It has considerable authority over our personal lives as well and the more conservate a mayor is, the more likely they are to exert it. This leaves us with no clear choice, unless there's going to be a third candidate that we don't know about yet. Seth David Schoen <schoen@uclink4.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in article <6b44k6$d9i$1@agate.berkeley.edu>... > It sounds like, unless there's a Libertarian running, Mayor Dean will be > the logical recipient of Cal Libertarians support -- unless we want to > advocate NOTA....