Re: Libertarianism Q&A

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Seth David Schoen: "Re: Sabet's anti-drug piece"
• Previous message: Daniel C. Burton: "Re: Why Devolution? (mayoral race)"
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel C. Burton: "Libertarianism Q&A"

Daniel C. Burton writes:

>The best way to avoid this is to read the Libertarian Party Platform and
>let the people who agree with its points present their case first.  Then
>it's good for people who are knowledgeable about the movement as a whole to
>say, "There are also libertarians who disagree on this issue because they
>think such-and-such, but the party platform says this...."

That's probably a good approach.

-- 
   Seth David Schoen L&S '01 (undeclared) / schoen@uclink4.berkeley.edu
Magna dis immortalibus habenda est atque huic ipsi Iovi Statori, antiquissimo
custodi huius urbis, gratia, quod hanc tam taetram, tam horribilem tamque
infestam rei publicae pestem totiens iam effugimus.  -- Cicero, in Catilinam I

• Next message: Seth David Schoen: "Re: Sabet's anti-drug piece"
• Previous message: Daniel C. Burton: "Re: Why Devolution? (mayoral race)"
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel C. Burton: "Libertarianism Q&A"