Kevin Dempsey Peterson <peterson@ocf.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in article <Pine.SOL.3.96.980208194051.9573B-100000@apocalypse>... > On 8 Feb 1998, Daniel C. Burton wrote: > > >Since almost everyone seems to support things like smoking bans and all > >sorts of violations of individual rights, it's probably not a good idea for > >us to support anyone. In fact, I'm leaning towards endorsing "none of the > >above." At least low voter turnout is interpreted as a sign that > >something's wrong. > > Screw low voter turn out -- write in "None of the Above". Not voting > leaves it unclear why people didn't vote. A write in (for anyone) is a > clear indication that you care who is in office, but don't like any of > the options. Besides, Dean 40% what's her name 35% other 25% would be a > good encouragement for anyone else who is considering running. I don't think that gets recorded. "None of the Above" is not a "qualified write-in candidate," so therefore the only people who will see this are the polling workers. Sure, it's fun to write this in, but you should know it's the same thing as casting a blank ballot (which isn't recorded either). This is what the Libertarian Party keeps complaining about about ballot access laws. You can't even be a qualified write-in candidate without going through certain requirements. This doesn't seem to be the case for the Presidential election, but it is for almost every other office.