Author |
Topic: Group with many trivially intersecting subgroups (Read 2135 times) |
|
ecoist
Senior Riddler
Gender: 
Posts: 405
|
 |
Group with many trivially intersecting subgroups
« on: Mar 2nd, 2006, 2:24pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
Determine all groups G of order n2 containing n+1 subroups of order n, any two of which intersect in the identity of G.
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 500
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #1 on: Mar 4th, 2006, 1:28pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I guess that the only examples are vector spaces of even dimension over the finite fields F_p.
These are indeed of the form required: if |G| = p^(2n), view G as the cartesian product
H x H of two copies of the additive group of the field H of p^n elements. Then there
is the subgroup { ( 0, h ) ; h in H } and the subgroups { (h, k h ) ; h in H } for each
fixed k in the field H.
One might think that more general groups G = H x H would apply, but I don't know
what other possibilities exist for H besides cyclic simple groups. The problem would
be to enumerate all the subgroups of order |H|. Among them are: the group { 1 } x H, and
all the groups { (x, phi(x)) ; x in H } for each endomorphism phi of H. However, in order
for these to be disjoint, we would have to choose the phi's so that
phi(x) = phi'(x) ==> ( phi=phi' or x = 1 ).
In particular, for every two non-identity elements x and y there have to be endomorphisms
carrying x to y. That means that all these elements have to have the same order, so H is a
p-group (of exponent p). But every endomorphism of a p-group carries the Frattini subgroup
back to within itself, so there would be no such phi if x is in the Frattini subgroup but not y.
This this means the Frattini group is trivial, i.e. H is an elementary-abelian p-group. As I
showed in the previous paragraph, for such an H, G = H x H always meets the condition for
some selection of subgroups of order |H|.
So it looks like "group squares" H x H only work with H is elementary abelian. However,
I do not claim that my list of all subgroups of order |H| in H x H is complete; it could
be that there are others, and maybe including those others in the list of subgroups of order|H|
would allow you to find |H|+1 of these subgroups which are disjoint.
At this moment I can only guess that the condition implies that G has to be a square H x H in
the first place. It's a sort of unusual condition.
How did this problem arise?
|
| « Last Edit: Mar 4th, 2006, 1:39pm by Michael Dagg » |
IP Logged |
Regards,
Michael Dagg
|
|
|
ecoist
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 405
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #2 on: Mar 4th, 2006, 1:48pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Quote:| How did this problem arise? |
|
I was trying to use group theory to construct orthogonal latin squares. The existence of such a group insures the existence of a complete set of mutually orthogonal latin squares of order n, or equivalently, the existence of a projective plane of order n.
As your analysis suggests, this group theory approach yields nothing new on mutually orthogonal latin squares.
|
| « Last Edit: Mar 4th, 2006, 1:51pm by ecoist » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 500
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #3 on: Mar 7th, 2006, 4:29pm » |
Quote Modify
|
That explains why G has to be square.
If this had been posted as a latin squares problem I would have likely not bitten.
If you know group theory, you can take my previous remarks and compose a construction.
|
|
IP Logged |
Regards,
Michael Dagg
|
|
|
ecoist
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 405
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #4 on: Mar 7th, 2006, 5:20pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Quote:| If you know group theory, you can take my previous remarks and compose a construction. |
|
One solver used his knowledge of geometry to partially solve the problem, but no knowledge of combinatorics or geometry is needed to solve this problem completely.
You know group theory apparently, so why not complete your analysis? Or do you expect your solution to be too long to bother with? I hope you reconsider posting a proof. I enjoy seeing proofs different from mine.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 500
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #5 on: Mar 8th, 2006, 2:55pm » |
Quote Modify
|
This is likely more useful than anything else I can offer:
MR1829097 (2002g:05036)
Colbourn, Charles J.(1-VT-C); Dinitz, Jeffrey H.(1-VT-C)
Mutually orthogonal Latin squares: a brief survey of constructions.
(English. English summary)
ÿÿÿðE-ñw7Ç`
|
|
IP Logged |
Regards,
Michael Dagg
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Guest
|
This post was corrupted, and has now been reproduced in reply 12. --towr
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 7th, 2007, 10:49am by towr » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 500
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #8 on: Oct 25th, 2006, 9:11am » |
Quote Modify
|
Icarus, notice that ecoist's solution has gone corrupt -- well, sort of.
There are lots of nice solutions on this forum that would be a pity to loose.
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 25th, 2006, 9:17am by Michael Dagg » |
IP Logged |
Regards,
Michael Dagg
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #9 on: Oct 25th, 2006, 7:25pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Indeed. Unfortunately, I don't have any more ability to correct this than you do. I've sent an E-mail to William Wu about it. I don't know if he'll be able to do anything either.
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
Gender:
Posts: 1291
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #10 on: Oct 25th, 2006, 9:46pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Hello,
Allegedly around 1% of data hosted on OCF was lost in the recent OCF server outage, when the hard drives failed. Please let me know of any other instances of lost/corrupted data, and I will try to work with the staff to recover it if possible.
It appears the forum is much faster now! 
|
|
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #11 on: Oct 26th, 2006, 1:06am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 25th, 2006, 9:46pm, william wu wrote:| It appears the forum is much faster now! |
|
Appearances may be deceiving. It comes and goes; the forum was even unreachable at timed yesterday.
Quote:| Please let me know of any other instances of lost/corrupted data, and I will try to work with the staff to recover it if possible. |
|
alien's account has been lost (I emailed you about it, but maybe that got lost too)
And posts seem to be disappearing occasionally.
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 26th, 2006, 1:07am by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
ecoist
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 405
|
|
Re: Group with many trivially intersecting subgrou
« Reply #12 on: Oct 7th, 2007, 10:37am » |
Quote Modify
|
Finally getting around to rewriting the corrupted post solving this problem!
Let G be a group of order n2 with n+1 subgroups of order n with pairwise trivial intersection. Then G is an elementary abelian p-group.
Proof. The integer n is greater than 1 because a group of order 1 cannot have two subgroups. Also, every nonidentity element of G belongs to a unique one of the n+1 given subgroups of order n. Let A and B be any two of the given subgroups of order n. Then G=AB. We show A is normal in G. Suppose that, for some x in G, x-1ax lies outside A. Then, without loss we may assume x-1ax=b in B, and that x=a*b*, with a* in A and b* in B. But then
b=x-1ax=b*-1a*-1aa*b*;
so
b*bb*-1=a*-1aa*=1,
because A and B have trivial intersection. Hence b=1, contradiction. Therefore, A is normal in G; and so, too, are all of the given subgroups of order n. Next we show that G is abelian. So far, we know that G is the direct product of A and B. Let x be any element of G outside of both A and B. Then x belongs to a unique one, say C, of the given subgroups of order n. Hence every element of C commutes with every element of both A and B (because G is the direct product of both C and A and C and B), whence x is in the center of G. Switching roles of A, B, and C, it follows that G is abelian. Finally, we show that every nonidentity element of G must have the same prime order. Let a be an element of prime order p in A and let b be any nonidentity element of B. Then ab lies outside both A and B and hence lies in a unique one of the given subgroups of order n, say, without loss, C. Now C determines an isomorphism from A to B defined by, f(a) is the unique element of B such that af(a) lies in C. It follows that every nonidentity element of A has order p. Hence A and B are elementary abelian p-groups; and so G is an elementary abelian p-group of order p2k, for some prime p and positive integer k.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print
Remove