Absorption, daydreaming, and absent-mindedness occur more or less spontaneously -- though of course, people can deliberately engage in both sorts of activities. The alterations in consciousness associated with meditation, however, require deliberate, conscious effort, training, and discipline.
At first pass, we can identify two great meditative traditions, both associated with South and East Asia:
Interestingly, although -- as we shall see later -- neuroscientists have become involved in studying what happens in the brain during meditation, both the Vedic-Hindu and Buddhist traditions hold that consciousness exists independently of the brain. For an excellent account of the relations between the Eastern meditative traditions and contemporary neuroscience, see Waking, Dreaming, Being: Self-and Consciousness in Neuroscience, Meditation, and Philosophy by Evan Thompson (2014). Thompson himself doubts that consciousness can exist independent of the brain, either in mediation or in states like the out-of-body or near-death experience, discussed in the earlier lectures on Mind Without Body. Rather, he argues that OBEs and NDEs are experiential states correlated with particular brain states -- specifically states of the brain in the process of dying. But I digress.
Yoga and Zen were introduced to America at the World Parliament of Religions, held in conjunction with the World's Columbian Exposition, a World's Fair held in Chicago in 1893. The Parliament brought together leading authorities of most of the world's religions, who gave lectures and demonstrations of their beliefs and practices. Among the most memorable of these was Swami Vivekananda, a prominent yogi from India, and Soen Shaku, a Buddhist monk who led the Japanese delegation. Thereafter, both yoga and zen were gradually absorbed into American culture -- in the process of which they gradually became secularized, dissociated from their religious and philosophical origins, and commodified, taught for a fee.
The music historian Orlando Figgis, writing of Rachmaninoff's All-Night Vigil (combining the Matins and Vespers), "As in Russian folk song, too, there is a constant repetition of melody, which over several hours -- the Russian Orthodox service can be interminably long -- can have the effect of inducing a trance-like state of religious ecstasy" (quoted by Paul Hillier in an essay in The Steve Reich Reader).
Western meditative traditions have been much less popular topics of study -- which may bespeak a tendency toward exoticism, or what Edward Said called "Orientalism", among Westerners.
The unitive mysticism of Pseudo-Dionysius, as represented in his Mystical Theology derived from Plotinus (d. 270 CE) , a pagan "neo-Platonist" philosopher (in his Lecture on "Plotinus and Neo-Platonism" Cary calls him the "last great philosopher of pagan antiquity). Recall Plato's "Allegory of the Cave": it is as if we are chained facing the wall of a cave, and all we can see are the shadows cast by reality -- the Forms -- by a fire. The philosopher is like a prisoner freed from the cave, who can see reality directly. For Plotinus, this is the "moment of understanding" when the human mind connects with the "divine Mind". For most of us, if we even get that far, this connection occurs only momentarily. But for some, the ability to see reality directly is a permanent state of cognitive existence. And that's not all. Beyond (really, above) the Forms and the divine Mind is "the One". If we're really lucky, we can get beyond the duality of seer (the one who knows the Forms) and seen (the Forms themselves), and achieve union with the One.
Just as St. Thomas Aquinas based his theology on Aristotle, so Pseudo-Dionysius based his on Plotinus, and Plato. We don't need to go into the details here, except to state the obvious: Plotinus' "the One" is P-D's God. God is the "incomprehensible One" who "passeth all understanding". It's not possible to understand God, but it is possible to achieve an ecstatic union with God when the soul goes outside and beyond itself, and "passes over" into God.
The Dionysian tradition of Christian mysticism comes to a head, at least for Cary, in the identity mysticism of Meister Eckhart (c. 1260-c.1327), another Christian neo-Platonist, who taught that the highest part of the individual soul is eternally identical with the divine One, or God. Just as Jesus Christ was "eternally begotten of the Father", even before the Incarnation, so this eternal begetting occurs in each of our individual souls. Put another way, God is already present in each individual person's soul, and the whole point of contemplation was to discover God in our own souls. In the 14th century, this idea was considered heretical, because orthodox Christian theology enforced a fundamental distinction between the soul and God. And, indeed, Eckhart was tried for heresy, and recanted all that was wrong in his teachings (without, apparently, specifying what those errors were).
Since Eckhart's time, most
Christian mystics have sought the union of the soul
with God, rather than discovering the identity of
the soul with God, thus preserving the basic distinction
between uncreated Creator and created creature. But
the basic idea, rooted in Pseudo-Dionysius and Meister
Eckhart, of achieving ecstatic union with God through
contemplative activity that transcends both the senses and
the intellect, can still be seen in the classics of the
Christian meditative tradition:
For reasons that only a sociologist of science could explain, however, this Western, Christian mystical tradition has not been the focus of scientific study. All the science has been focused on yoga, and Zen, and more recently Tibetan Buddhism. So that's where we turn for the rest of these lectures.
One exception has been recent work on Christian evangelicals by Tanya Luhrmann, an anthropologist, as summarized in her book, When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God (2012).
Modern evangelicalism is a very varied religious movement with its roots in the First and Second Great Awakenings, revivals of religious belief and practice that occurred in the late 18th and mid 19th centuries (Luhrmann identifies the 1960s as a "Third Great Awakening"). Evangelicals typically hold fundamentalist religious beliefs, such as the inerrancy of the Bible as God's true word. But in the present context, what is interesting about evangelicals is what Luhrmann calls their "concrete experience of God's nearness". Evangelicals may or may not speak in tongues -- glossolalia, which in and of itself may represent an alteration in consciousness), but they typically seek a direct experience of the presence of God.
Luhrmann studied a particular Evangelical church known as the Vineyard Christian Fellowship, whose members engage in a disciplined form of prayer, acquired through training -- much like a yoga or Zen master -- in which they not only talk to God, but God talks back, to them, personally. Her work employed the method of participant observation, in which she herself participated in the church's activities (church members knew what she was doing, so there was nothing dishonest about this).
From a materialist perspective, of course, this
is all a product of imagination. But, Luhrmann argues, it is
imagination of a very special sort, in which the person comes
"to treat the what the mind imagines as more real than the world
one knows". Everyone has the capacity for this kind of absorption,
to at least some degree (Luhrmann cites Tellegen's work in this
respect), but Luhrmann argues that members of the Vineyard, as
well as other like-minded and like-practiced evangelicals, have
honed absorption into a cognitive skill that is put to the
purpose of their religion.
Based on her observations, and reading in the
Christian mystical tradition, Luhrmann has classified Christian
prayer into three main categories.
|"Three Aspects of the Absolute", from a manuscript of the Nath Charit painted by Bukali (1823). The left panel represents the origin of existence; the center and right panels, its "emanations" into consciousness and form, represented by a Nath yogi. From Yoga: The Art of Transformation (see below). Note the resemblance to "The Emergence of Spirit and Matter", the image at the top of the lecture supplements on Mind and Body.|
Yoga meditation has its roots in the Yoga
Sutras by Patanjali, written about 200 BCE. The Samkhya
teaches that the self is held in bondage to matter by virtue
of ignorance and illusion, and must free itself by reversing
the evolution of the world, to return to an original state of
purity and consciousness. This process is called de-phenomenalization,
and involves controlling and suppressing mental activity, and
ending one's attachment to material objects.
The term yoga is derived from a Sanskrit
word meaning "union" -- as in the union of the individual self
with the cosmic, divine Self.
America, some of the "Transcendentalists", like Emerson and
Thoreau, were interested in Yoga (Thoreau actually practiced
yoga during his time on Walden Pond), but the discipline was
really introduced to America by Swami Vivekananda, who
lectured in Chicago at the Columbian Exposition of 1893.
Thereafter it was promoted by Pierre Bernard and his nephew
Theos Bernard, who established a center for Tantric Yoga at
the Clarkstown Country Club in Nyack, New York, in 1909.
The CCC, in turn, served as a kind of American base for Swami
Paramahansa Yogananda, the author of Autobiography of a
Yogi (1944), who toured America in the 1920s and
1930s. Subsequently, American
interest in yoga shifted back and forth between the
spiritual and the secular.
An offshoot of Yoga meditation
is the program of Transcendental Meditation (TM)
promoted by the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
(1917-2008). In some ways, TM represents both a
secularization and a commodification of Yoga: TM abandons much
of Hindu religious beliefs in favor of a more secular
philosophy of Vedanta, which emphasizes meditation
alone -- techniques that are taught for a fee in
classes. In TM, practitioners learn to meditate on a mantra,
a short word or phrase (e.g., om mani padme hum, or "om,
the jewel in the lotus, hum"), provided to them by
their Guru, in order to achieve deep relaxation, and
enhanced joy, vitality, and creativity. Like the Dalai
Lama, the Maharishi was very interested in psychology, and in
his Science of Creative Intelligence taught
that through TM, practitioners could achieve a higher stage of
cognitive development -- apparently, there's more to life
beyond Piagetian formal operations!).
For an account of the TM course taught in 1968 by Maharishi at his ashram in Rishikesh, and attended by the Beatles, the Beach Boys, Donavan, Mia Farrow, and other popular-culture figures, see "The Road to Bliss" by Mike Love (yes, that Mike Love), Smithsonian magazine, 01-02/2018.
Meditation plays a more important role in
Buddhism than in any other major religion, as it is the path
All of this, in Buddhist doctrine, leads ultimately to nirvana, and with it the extinction of both desire and of individual consciousness.
Still, it's important to
understand that meditation, and the mindfulness that it
inculcates, is not all there is to achieving
nirvana, and ending suffering. There is also an ethical
code, consisting of what
might be called "The Six Rights": Right Understanding, Right
Motivation, Right Livelihood, Right Action, Right Speech, and
Right Effort. The whole thing is a package, and
meditation and mindfulness alone won't do the trick.
If meditation is important to Buddhism, it is
especially important to Zen Buddhism, a form
originating in China in the 5th century CE, and imported to Japan in the 12th century, and to the United
States by Daisetz T. Suzuki (1870-1966). There are three major sects of Zen Buddhism,
differing mainly in their objects of concentration.
In addition to Zen, interest in Tibetan Buddhist meditation has been greatly stimulated stimulated by the undeniably charismatic Dalai Lama. Tibetan Buddhism, in turn, has been taken up by a number of researchers associated with the positive psychology movement.
[A year after taking up Zen meditation] he attended his first multiday sesshin with a group of Zen meditators. The Rinzai teacher instructed him to "kill the watcher" within. By the third session he experienced kensho, which some meditators spend their lives hoping to attain: " I felt as if something like an earthquake or implosion was about to happen," he wrote in his autobiography. "Everything around me looked exceedingly odd, as if the glue separating things had started to melt.... By the time I got to my room I was weightless; there was no gravity.... Then the earthquake or implosion -- 'body and mind dropping off' -- occurred. There was an incredible explosion of light coming from inside and outside simultaneously, and everything disappeared into that light... there was no longer a here versus there, a this versus that.... I understood nothing except that nothing would ever seem the same to me.... And despite the fact that I had no understanding whatever of what had happened (nor do I now), this experience changed my life completely" ("How a Zen Master Found the Light (Again) on the Analyst's Couch" by Chip Brown, New York Times Magazine, 04/26/2009).
While Zen Buddhism is usually associated with inner serenity, compassion, and nonviolence, it can be very warlike -- an extension of the great demands it makes for mental discipline. As such, it has a dark history recounted by Brian Victoria, himself a Zen priest and historian, in Zen at War (1997) and Zen War Stories (2002). Victoria shows that Zen was long associated with the Japanese warrior culture, as a kind of romanticization of the samurai. Along with the state religion of Shinto, Zen formed the theological underpinnings for Japanese aggression in World War II: the self-denying egolessness of the Zen master became "fascist mind control", and acceptance of death justified killing and martyrdom -- as in the kamikaze pilots, and the treat of national suicide if the home islands were ever invaded. Of course, some of this also represented social conformity under political pressure. Doubtless, Zen was co-opted by the Japanese war machine, just as religions are everywhere from time to time (in World War II, some Catholic priests blessed American tanks).
All of which leaves us with a number of different techniques, all of which go under the label of "meditation". Antoine Lutz (2008), a prominent contemporary meditation researcher, identifies several basic kinds of Buddhist meditation technique.
Based on both controlled research
and personal experience with meditation, Lutz et al. (2015) have
offered a 3-dimensional matrix for classifying various forms of
meditation and related experiences (including
mind-wandering). It looks a little like Hobson's AIM model,
introduced in the lectures on Sleep and Dreaming, but the
axes are different. Lutz's scheme consists of three
independent primary dimensions targeted by all
"mindfulness practices", such as meditation, and four secondary
qualities, which distinguish among various practices.
The primary qualities are considered orthogonal to, or independent of, each other:
The secondary qualities are also more or less independent of the primary qualities. You can think of them as four additional dimensions of mindfulness-related practices. It's just that, in visual terms, they're hard to plot in the three-dimensional space that's already taken up with the three primary qualities.
The point of all of this is that there are lots of different kinds of "meditation". When we try to bring meditation into the laboratory, to study is scientifically, it's important to be clear about what kind of meditation we are studying. Yoga practiced to achieve samadhi may be quite different in its effects than yoga practiced to achieve six-pack abs. Contemplating a Zen koan may have quite different effects than contemplating the suffering of the world.
Of course, even diligent meditators
experience episodes of mind-wandering and daydreaming -- which is
one reason that Zen masters wield a keisaku, a wooden
stick which they use when a pupil falls asleep or otherwise drifts
off. Based on studies of the default mode network in
the brain, an fMRI study by Hasenkamp et al. examined brain
activity in a group of subjects practicing "one-point" or "focused
attention" meditation. The study is of particular interest
because it brings together two literatures: one on meditation as
mind-focusing, and the other on daydreaming as mind-wandering.
With increased practice at meditation, these episodes become less frequent in occurrence and shorter in duration.
Here's a nice depiction of the entire cycle, from "The Mind of
the Meditator" by M. Ricard, A. Lutz, and R.J. Davidson (Scientific
American, 11/2014). the implication of this study,
however, is that from a cognitive-neuroscientific point of view,
meditation is just a special case of focused attention --
different in quantity, perhaps, but not different qualitatively
from focusing attention on any other object of interest, such as a
symphony or a football game.
I'm not a scholar of world religions. I'm really only interested in placing meditation in its original religious and cultural context. To that end, the information in this section is drawn freely from the Encyclopedia of World Religions, edited by Wendy Doniger (1999), to which the interested reader is referred for more detail on these topics -- and indeed concerning all things religious.
Students with a special interest in Buddhism are encouraged to take the course on Buddhist psychology offered by Prof. Eleanor Rosch and her colleagues; there are also relevant courses offered in the undergraduate interdisciplinary major in Religious Studies.
For an account of a Vipassana Buddhist meditation, see two books by Tim Parks, himself a longtime practitioner:
This scientific research almost necessarily stripped meditation practices of their religious and cultural underpinnings. Arthur Deikman, Edward Maupin, and others sought to bring meditation in the laboratory by developing standardized procedures for concentrative meditation, and then inquiring into subjects' phenomenal experiences.
Deikman (1963) asked subjects to concentrate on a blue vase for 15 "nonanalytic, discursive" minutes, excluding irrelevant thoughts (this isn't Deikman's vase, but it will do for the purposes of illustration). Across 12 such sessions, he played auditory messages (music, prose, poetry, and even word lists) in the background. His subjects reported changes in their perception of the vase (e.g., its color and shape); changes in the sense of time (i.e., that time passed more quickly than usual), decreased distraction, and increased "personal involvement" with the vase.
Ina similar experiment, Maupin (1965) engaged subjects in a Zen meditation exercise, in which meditators focused on their breathing, rather than on an internal object, for nine 45-minute sessions. He then classified their responses into five categories:
Although most of Maupin's subjects experienced relaxation and calmness, only relatively few achieved a state of concentration and detachment. Perhaps inspired by the assessment of hypnotizability, Maupin tried to classify his subjects in terms of their response to the meditation procedure. "Low" responders experienced primarily fogginess and relaxation, while "high" responders were also able to achieve some level of detachment.
In a pioneering attempt to correlated response to meditation with something else, outside the domain of meditation, Van Nuys (1973) instructed subjects to concentrate on a candle, or on their breathing. Subjects varied widely in terms of the number of intrusive thoughts they experienced. This variable correlated negatively with hypnotizability (i.e., fewer intrusions were associated with high hypnotizability), but not scores on the As Experience Inventory, a forerunner to the Tellegen Absorption Scale. The correlation with hypnotizability probably means that subjects who can focus their attention on a candle, or on their breathing, can also focus their attention on the hypnotic induction.
Research on meditation is potentially interesting, but from the perspective of modern experimental psychology, it entails some serious problems.
First and foremost, experimental psychologists like to employ the random assignment of subjects to conditions. This allows them to make strong inferences that the independent variable manipulated in the experiment really has a causal influence on the dependent outcome variable. But a meditative practice ripped from its philosophical, religious, and cultural underpinnings may not be the same as the same practice in its usual cultural context. After all, the goal of yoga or Zen meditation is expressly religious. Put another way: yoga meditation may have quite different effects on Hindus than on Presbyterians (or agnostics or atheists). The obvious problem, then is that while an experimenter can randomly assign subjects to focus their attention on a vase (the experimental group) or not (the control group), you can't assign subjects randomly to be Hindus or Buddhists.
Second, there is the problem of practice effects. The effects of meditation in neophytes may be quite different from those in experienced by experts. And it is possible that the effects of meditation differ depending on whether meditation is practiced in a religious-philosophical or secular-instrumental context.
At the very least, research needs to distinguish between three quite different types of effects of meditation
How to Meditate
Of course, if you're going to
study meditation, you've got to know how to meditate
in the first place. By now, there are a number
of commercial meditation programs out there, some of which are discussed below:
Transcendental Meditation, the Relaxation Response,
and Mindfulness Meditation.
The essence of all these meditative practices has been distilled by Andrew Newberg, a physician who has pioneered the study of neurotheology, or the application of neuroscientific techniques such as brain imaging to the study of religious practice and experience -- including various forms of prayer and meditation.
Setting these non-trivial problems aside, why should anyone want to do this research?Based on his research, Deikman believed that meditative experiences came in two broad forms:
In Deikman's view, renunciation without contemplation is not effective. Contemplation without renunciation is not enough.
Both contemplation and renunciation are woven into a psychosocial system -- the theology, philosophy, or "culture" of Yoga, or Zen, or whatever, or even the affiliation with a particular master or guru -- intended to bring about the desired cognitive changes.
The object of the meditative exercise, according
to Deikman, is to shift from an action mode
entailing the manipulation of the environment to a
receptive mode of passive experience --
from doing things to letting things be.
Deikman (1966) summarized all
this with a single word: de-automatization:
a re-organization of cognitive structures, which
usually operate automatically, so that the
meditator looks at the self and the world in new
ways. Unfortunately, Deikman was ahead of
his time: although terms like "automatism" had
been around since the 19th century (as in the
early literature on hysteria), modern cognitive
psychology did not employ this term with a
rigorous technical definition until the
But setting aside the philosophical and religious and mystical implications of the meditative experience, looking back from the perspective of modern cognitive psychology and cognitive science, we can see what the theoretical implications of meditation might be. Usually, we think of automatization as permanent. Whether the process is innately automatic, or automatized through learning and practice (proceduralization), the tacit assumption has been that automaticity is permanent. Once a process is automatized, it stays automatized. But meditation offers the possibility -- the hypothesis -- that automatization is not permanent, and can be reversed.
Early experiments on meditation involved either attempts to perform controlled, quantitative studies of religious practitioners, or attempts to develop laboratory models of meditation exercises which could be performed by novices.
Much of this work has employed EEG measures, and much of the EEG work has focused on alpha activity.
Perhaps the most provocative of these early studies were two psychophysiological experiments on yoga and Zen meditation.
In the yoga experiment, Anand et al. (1961) recorded EEG activity in two experienced yogis, and in a larger group of yoga students. They found increased density of alpha activity during meditation.
More interesting, however, they found no evidence of alpha blocking -- a reflexive orienting response in which alpha activity disappears when the subject orients to a novel stimulus. The abolition of the blocking response was interpreted as consistent with the goal of yoga meditation, samadhi, which is to become oblivious to environmental stimuli.
In the Zen experiment, Kasamatsu & Hirai (1966) studied Zen masters and students, all of whom were practicing the classic zazen form of meditation -- sitting, with eyes open and focused in front.
Again, they found increased alpha activity -- despite the fact that the subjects' eyes were open. Towards the end of the meditation periods, they also observed an increased density of EEG theta activity.
The density of alpha activity in the EEG was positively correlated with both the amount of experience of the subject with meditation, and with the master's evaluation of the subject's progress in training.
In contrast to yoga, however,they observed that alpha blocking to the novel stimulus was not abolished. To the contrary, alpha blocking did not habituate with continued presentations of the stimulus.
The persistence of blocking, and the abolition of habituation, was interpreted as consistent with the goal of Zen meditation, satori, which is to free the mind from preconceptions and be attuned to each new experience as it presents itself.
Both studies revealed an increase in slow-wave activity in the EEG: an increase in alpha density, a decrease (i.e., slowing) in the frequency of alpha activity, and an increase in theta activity. Of course, some of this could have been an artifact. Alpha activity increases when subjects close their eyes, and even with their eyes open, alpha increases when subjects are "not looking" at anything in particular. More important, taken together, the yoga and Zen studies seemed to show that the physiological effects of meditation were in line with the philosophical-religious goals of the discipline. Yogis seek to become oblivious to the world, and they don't respond to novel stimuli. Zen meditators seek to dissolve preconceived categories, and they don't habituate the alpha-blocking response.
Unfortunately, the findings with respect to alpha blocking were not confirmed in a replication attempt by Wallace & Benson (1981). Their study included practitioners of traditional Yoga, Transcendental Meditation (a secularized form of Yoga -- see below) and Zen, as well as control groups of nonmeditators who were instructed either to attend to or ignore the stimuli. The five groups performed essentially identically in the experiment. although the meditators did show an increase in EEG alpha activity, no group showed any particular effect on alpha blocking or on habituation. Failures to replicate are surprisingly common in science, and this discrepancy remains to be resolved by further research.
One offshoot of the initial psychological interest in meditation has been research and clinical application of alpha-wave biofeedback. In biofeedback, information about the functioning of internal organs and systems, normally unavailable to conscious perception, is picked up electronically and fed to the person in the form of an auditory or visual signal. The person is then taught to engage in some activity which will alter the internal function, as reflected in changes in the signal. Research by Neal Miller indicated that nonhuman animals could learn to control levels of autonomic function through biofeedback (with physiological changes in the desired direction rewarded by electrical stimulation of the brain), and researchers and clinicians quickly came to apply biofeedback technology in the treatment of a host of physical, psychological, and psychosomatic problems.
In a pioneering study, Kamiya (1969) reported that subjects could learn to discriminate levels of alpha activity (i.e., alpha density) in the EEG, and could also learn, through biofeedback, to increase the levels of alpha activity in their brains. The subjective characteristics of the "alpha state" appeared to resemble those of meditation, leading to the peculiarly American idea that people could achieve satori through technology rather than through religious discipline.
Kamiya's initial report was subsequently confirmed by Nowlis & Kamiya (1970) and by Brown (1970), but critics soon discovered methodological problems with these studies that cast doubt on their conclusions and implications.
For example, the ability to detect the presence of alpha activity may be an artifact of response bias. Under ordinary circumstances, as subjects habituate to the experimental situation, alpha activity increases over time. Therefore, if alpha density is increasing, subjects who are biased to say they are in the alpha state will be right more often than wrong, just by chance. This is a situation that signal-detection theory is able to unconfound, but signal-detection theory requires the presence of the stimulus (in this case, alpha activity) to be under the control of the experimenter -- which is not possible in the case of endogenous EEG variables.
In addition, it is known that visual activity blocks EEG alpha, and that this blocking habituates over time. It is possible that the appearance of learning to increase alpha density reflects this habituation process. Alternatively, the appearance of learning could reflect nothing more than disinhibition of alpha produced by disengaging from looking activity.
A series of studies by Paskewitz and his associates (1969, 1971, 1973) found no evidence that subjects with their eyes open could learn to produce levels of alpha activity exceeding those observed in an eyes-closed baseline session. Furthermore, equivalent increases in alpha activity were found in a "yoked" control group of subjects who received the same feedback as the experimental group, regardless of their levels of EEG alpha. So, despite appearances, there appears to be no contingent learning in alpha biofeedback. Moreover, Paskewitz et al. found that subjective reports of the "alpha state" were influenced by demand characteristics of the biofeedback situation, a finding confirmed by Plotkin. Biofeedback may help people to gain control of certain autonomic functions, but brain-wave biofeedback does not appear to be a route to instant satori.
John's Excellent Adventure with Shibayama
As an undergraduate, I read the Anand and Kasamatsu & Hirai studies of meditation, and Kamiya's initial report on alpha biofeedback, as reprinted in Charles Tart's pioneering anthology, Altered States of Consciousness (1969). I had determined that my senior honors thesis in psychology would be a replication of Tart's research.
the time, the campus was being
Zenkei Shibiyama Roshi,
chief abbot (kancho) of
Nanzen-ji Monastery in Kyoto
(garden pictured below), who was
giving a seminar on Zen Buddhism
as part of one of his frequent
lecture tours to the United
(1894-1974) was ordained a
Buddhist monk in 1908: Among his
Keido Fukushima, abbot of
Tokufuji" (see The Laughing
Buddha of Tofukuji: The Life of
Zen Master Keido Fukushima
by Ishwar C. Harris); and
D.T. Suzuki, who is
primarily responsible for bringing
Zen to the United States in the
1960s (see his Zen Buddhism
and the Way of Zen).
Shibayama's writings include A
Flower Does Not Talk: Zen Essays
(including a number of lectures
delivered to students in
training), and The Gateless
Barrier: Zen Comments on the
Mumonkan (a set of 48 koans
used in training).
A little background:
Anyway, I did not have room in my schedule to take Shibayama's seminar, but I had met him on a couple of occasions under the auspices of Chapel House, a meditative retreat center at Colgate where he was staying. So while I waited for the psychology department's technician to breadboard a biofeedback device, I set about attempting to replicate the Kasamatsu experiment -- on Shibayama (as it happened, the tech was unable to get the equipment working in time, so I did my thesis on hypnosis instead). In one of our meetings I described the research on Zen and Yoga practitioners, and later provided him with copies of the papers. His response on both occasions was "It's very interesting, but what does it mean?". Eventually, I screwed up my courage and asked him if he would allow an EEG recording while he meditated. Never mind that Rinzai Zen focuses on koans, not zazen! His response: "If the Pope were here, would you ask to record his brainwaves while he prayed?". When I admitted that I would not, he asked "Why not?". I had no answer, and that effectively ended the discussion.
Laughing Buddha of Tofukuji,
Ishwar Harris reports that, at one
point, Shibayama told Fukushima
(also known as Gensho) that he
should return to his university,
"implying that Gensho thought like
a scholar not like a koan
student". Perhaps Shibayama
was offering me similar
advice. But in retrospect, I
think that his question about the
Pope at prayer was my own little
koan -- and that when I solved it,
I would achieve at least a little
bit of enlightenment.
Binaural beats are an auditory
illusion. When two pure tones of
slightly different frequencies are presented
to each ear, their loudness appears to
fluctuate at a frequency equal to the
difference between them. So, for
example, if a tone of 440 hz is presented to
the left ear and a tone of 445 hz is presented
to the right ear, the tones will appear to
fluctuate at a rate of 5/second. They
were comprehensively described in an article,
"Auditory beats in the Brain", by Gerald
Oster, a biophysicist, that appeared in Scientific
American for October 1973.
These beats are familiar to any musician who has tuned one instrument to another, but after Oster's article appeared some 'New Age" types began to make claims that these beats "entrained" brain waves, and thus could influence consciousness. So, for example, it was claimed that beats in the range of EEG alpha activity (roughly 8-14 cps) would increase levels of alpha activity in the brain, and thus induce a meditation-like state (based on evidence that meditation also produced an increase in alpha activity). And "binaural beat generators" are sold by a number of firms, for just this purpose.
But the scientific base for these claims is very thin. A quick PsycInfo search turned up only two articles bearing on the question, both from the same research group (Wahbeh et al), and published in the Journal of Complementary Medicine for 2007. In the first study subjects who got 60 days of binaural beats showed a reduction in trait anxiety. The second study had something like a placebo control group: it didn't measure anxiety, but the subjects did show an increase in depression. That's it. That's the scientific base.
I'm sure that there's a placebo effect here -- frankly, there's a placebo effect in almost every treatment!
But, like alpha-wave biofeedback, I suspect that the attraction of binaural beats is that they offer another way to achieve "instant satori -- enlightenment without all the hassle of disciplined contemplation.
Meditation was originally imported to the West, and first came to scientific attention, in an explicitly philosophical-religious context: Hinduism and Vedic philosophy for Yoga, Buddhism for Zen. A more recent trend, however, has been to strip away the religious-philosophical aspects of meditative practice, and to teach meditation, for a fee, in a secular context as a means of self-improvement -- for example, as a form of physical exercise or a means of stress-reduction.
A great deal of meditation research has involved Transcendental Meditation (TM), a commodified (trademarked and commercialized) offshoot of Yoga meditation developed by the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and popularized by him and his followers as the "Science of Creative Intelligence", based on the Indian philosophy of Vedanta, which forms the basis of Hinduism. Its major texts are the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras, and the Bhagavad Gita. Although the focus of TM is on meditation technique rather than any particular set of religious or philosophical beliefs, and TM can be (and is) practiced by people who hold a wide variety of religious beliefs (or none), TM retains a quasi-religious character -- especially in the "TM-Sidhi" program.
Later, TM was fully secularized by Herbert Benson, a psychiatrist at Harvard Medical School, in the form of the "relaxation response", and promoted as a means of achieving cardiovascular health.
Proponents of both TM and The Relaxation Response have generated a large body of laboratory research. However, these experiments have focused mostly on the physiological effects of meditation, which resemble those of profound (but alert, not sleep-like) relaxation (e.g., Wallace & Benson, 1972). There have been very few studies of the cognitive effects of meditation.
For example, Dillbeck & Orme-Johnson (1987) found that TM significantly modulated various physiological measures of stress, compared to a control period in which subjects merely rested.
In much the same way, the principles of Buddhist meditation (primarily Zen, but not exclusively) have been secularized in the form of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) by John Kabat-Zinn, a clinical psychologist at the University of Massachusetts School of Medicine. MBSR is expressly presented as a secularized derivative of Buddhist practice, intended to achieve a state of "moment-to-moment nonjudgmental awareness" as a means of reducing the stress of everyday living.
MBSR is operationally defined -- that is, defined by the operations that produce it -- as follows:
As with the Relaxation Response, MBSR is intended as a method of stress-reduction, and not necessarily for consciousness-raising or de-automatization. Accordingly, most of the empirical research on MBSR has focused on its physiological effects on measures related to stress such as heart rate and blood pressure. Outcomes have also been measured in terms of reported mood and anxiety. This is quite reasonable, as MBSR has its origins as a stress-reduction technique. Any cognitive changes produced by MBSR are intended to "end suffering", and so the effectiveness of the technique has generally been measured in terms of its effects on stress and emotion -- whether these effects are measured psychometrically or psychophysiologically.
Bishop et al. (2004) have proposed a two-component model of mindfulness.
These outcomes are often measured by the usual sorts of psychometric instruments.
The Toronto Mindfulness Scale (Lau et al., 2006) yields two scales intended to tap the subject's experience during meditation.
Take the Toronto Mindfulness Scale
If you practice meditation, you might want to complete the TMS after your next session. If you don't practice meditation, you might want to complete it the next time you're daydreaming, or watching Dancing with the Stars.
Link to a page containing the TMS and scoring instructions.
In contrast to the "state" measurements of the TMS, the Five-Facet Mindfulness Scale (Baer et al., 2006, 2008) offers a somewhat more "trait-like" ted assessment of the consequences of meditative practice.
Take the Five-Facet Mindfulness Scale
This scale is intended to measure the stable, long-term consequences of mindfulness meditation practice. However, it can also be used as a kind of personality scale, just like the Tellegen Absorption Scale or the Short Imaginal Processes Inventory, or the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire.
Link to a page containing the FFMS and scoring instructions.
One example of the popularization of mindfulness meditation has
been the proliferation of smartphone application software (apps)
for mindfulness meditation. Among the most popular of these is
Headspace (for iPhone); also buddhify, Calm, Insight Timer, and
GPS for the Soul. A subscription to Headspace costs
$13/month (2015 prices), and supplies meditation "packs" on
various topics. For a discussion of Headspace, see "The
Higher Life" by Lizzie Widdicombe, New Yorker,
Another example of the secularization and commodification of Buddhist meditative techniques may be found in business management. Many large firms, especially high-tech firms centered on silicon Valley, now promote mindfulness-based meditation to their managers and other employees -- not necessarily for stress reduction, but rather to "disconnect to connect", and short-circuit the "rat-race" that comes along with high-powered business enterprises. This, in turn, has fostered the development of a whole new service industry -- namely, providing meditation training to these corporations. The stated goal of this meditation practice is to give the practitioner a competitive advantage. Now, here's a paradox. It's not clear that the goal of Buddhist meditation is stress-reduction, except indirectly, as a byproduct of clearing one's mind of habitual patterns of thought -- any more than that the goal of yoga is physical exercise (except as a path toward clearing one's mind). But, just as the primary purpose of yoga is not to trim your butt or flatten your abs, it's pretty clear that the goal of Buddhist medication is not to enhance one's competitiveness in the high-powered business environment characteristic of Western capitalism!
that, according to Deikman (1966), the
mystical experiences associated with
meditation have a number of different
facets, including reality transfer,
sensory translation, a unity between self
and object, ineffability, and
de-automatization. Only later, however,
did psychology and cognitive science
develop a full-blown
technical concept of automaticity,
providing a framework
for measuring the effects of meditation.
The question, then is whether
automaticity, once achieved, is permanent
-- or whether it is possible, through
meditation or any other means, to gain (or
conscious, voluntary control over some
automatic, unconscious process.
Perhaps, as well, the
answer will depend on how the process
has been automatized
in the first place. Processes
which have been automatized through
repeated practice may be easier to
de-automatize than those which are
innately automatic. Though,
still, that's a hypothesis.
Alpha Blocking, Startle, and Binocular Rivalry
Although they did not invoke the concept, the early studies of EEG alpha activity in yoga and zen described earlier bear on the question of de-automatization. Recall that, in addition to their general finding of increased levels of alpha activity, Anand et al. (1961) and Kasamatsu & Hirai (1966) found that meditation altered the alpha-blocking orienting response: yogis did not show alpha blocking to a novel stimulus, consistent with the goal of yoga meditation to become oblivious to the outside world; and zen practitioners did not habituate alpha-blocking to repeated presentations of the novel stimulus, consistent with the goal of Zen meditation to treat every event as novel. Unfortunately, as noted earlier, Becker and Shapiro (1981) failed to replicate either of these effects: yoga and zen practitioners showed the same patterns of EEG activity, and these were no different from controls. Still, it was a nice idea -- and maybe worth following up on.
Some subsequent investigators have also pushed the limits of de-automatization, looking at the effects of meditation on hard-wired, reflexive responses to stimulation.
Ekman, and Ricard
a study of
in one Tibetan
who also holds a
with 40 years' experience in
meditation. During the experiment (which seems almost
as Spartan as the study by Stern et al. of
hypnotic analgesia discussed in the
lectures on Hypnosis),
Ricard (and a group of nonmeditator controls) went
through six startle trials under each of 4
different conditions: That's a total
of 24 trials involving a brief "blast" of
white noise sounding not a little like a
|In the unanticipated startle control
condition, Ricard's psychophysiological responses to the
startle stimulus did not differ from that of the control
|During meditation, however, Ricard often
showed substantial modification of the startle response,
even compared to a non-meditative distraction
condition. This was especially the case for the "open
presence" form of meditation, which attempts to clear the
mind of all content whatsoever. That is, the
open-presence meditator is attending to nothing, and
thinking about nothing. Focused attention, by
contrast, had less effect on the startle reflex (though it
A study by Carter, Presti, and
their colleagues (2005) , employing a large number of Tibetan
monks and other experienced meditators, employed another automatic
behavior, binocular rivalry. In the BN paradigm,
subjects are presented with two different images to each eye --
one a horizontal, the other a vertical grating. Normally,
the visual system would fuse the separate 2-dimensional retinal
images into a single 3-dimensional image, but with such radically
disparate images this is impossible. Instead, the subject
experiences a random alternation between the images. This
phenomenon occurs automatically -- it's caused by a hard-wired
feature of the visual system. But, it turns out, one-point
meditation essentially abolishes binocular rivalry. During
meditation, a majority of subjects experienced a slowing of the
rate of alternation, and some subjects experienced a stable
image. Even after the meditation period had ended, half the
subjects continued to experience a slower rate of alternation --
though some showed a kind of rebound effect, alternation at an
even faster rate. Compassion meditation, by contrast, had no
effects at all on BN. That meditation can modulate something
as hired-wired as binocular rivalry is pretty interesting -- as is
the fact that the two types of meditation studied in this
experiment had quite different effects.
De-automatization entails the reorganization of cognitive schemata so that habitual modes of thought no longer operate automatically, and it is possible to view the world in other ways. When Deikman introduced the concept of de-automatization, psychology did not have a technical concept of automaticity. Now that it has one. Automatic processes are defined as those that are inevitably executed in response to some cue, incorrigibly executed, and consume no cognitive capacity. With such a definition in hand, it becomes possible, at least in principle, to determine whether training in a meditative discipline really does de-automatize cognitive processing. Arguably, the gold standard test of automatization, and thus of de-automatization, would be performance on the Stroop color-word interference test (or some variant on the Stroop paradigm). But investigators have also employed other paradigms in the quest to document de-automatization.
An early laboratory study by Dillbeck (1982) compared two different groups of TM practitioners against a non-meditating control group. One group "N/TM", waited for two weeks prior to initiating TM training; another group, "R/TM" practiced passive relaxation for two weeks prior to TM.
Later work by Alexander et al. (1989) suggested that TM could improve cognitive functioning in the elderly. This study involved a group of elderly residents of a retirement home, who practiced TM for 20 minute sessions, twice daily, for 12 weeks. Control groups engaged in a "mindful", guided attention activity intended to foster "new and creative" ways of thinking; mental relaxation; or nothing at all.
From time to time,
meditation researchers have employed other
tasks to study the
effects of meditation on various aspects
of cognitive and emotional processing
(for an overview, see Ricard et al.,
"Mind of the Meditator", Scientific
Meditation and the Stroop Task
earlier, the Stroop task is widely considered to be the primary exemplar
of automatic processing. The
study by Alexander et al. (1989)
did, in fact, find that TM
reduced Stroop interference. Unfortunately,
however, that reduction did not reach
However, a doctoral dissertation by Heidi Wenk-Sormaz (2006) Systematic research by Wenk-Sormaz did find that a "mindfulness" meditation exercise reduced Stroop interference (unlike many meditation researchers, who tend to be trained in clinical psychology, Wenk-Sormaz was trained as a cognitive psychologist). Her subjects, who were adult professionals participating in a short course on meditation, practiced a 15-minute exercise in which they focused on their breathing. This study was conducted before MBSR became popular, but the procedure was very similar to that employed in MBSR. Wenk-Sormaz assessed performance on the standard Stroop task before and after meditation.
to two control
the other of
in age to the
but this was
|Experiment 2a employed a different set of control groups. One group simply rested between tests; the other, who served as an active cognitive control, were taught to use the Method of Loci as a mnemonic device to learn a word-list. This study again found a reduction in Stroop interference for the meditators, though the effect was smaller than in Experiment 1.|
|Experiment 2b, employing the same conditions and subjects as 2a, examined the the effects of meditation on the generation of category instances. Subjects were provided with 10 category labels, and were given 30 seconds each to generate instances. Initially, she hoped that meditation would lead to a "freeing up" of thought, manifested in a tendency to generate less frequent, more atypical instances. In her first attempt, this didn't work out.|
|However, Experiment 3 found enhanced production of atypical instances during a category generation task -- but only when subjects were specifically instructed to produce atypical as opposed to typical instances. In the earlier attempt, subjects were unconstrained, and may have construed "typical" responses as appropriate to task demands. But this new experiment involved explicit requests for "typical" or "atypical" instances, in different conditions. When atypical instances were legitimized in this manner, meditators were better able to generate them -- again, apparently, demonstrating a freeing of thought from conventional patterns.|
So, the Wenk-Sormaz study shows that, indeed, meditation can lead to the de-automatization of thought. meditation reduced Stroop interference that was not an artifact of relaxation or arousal. And it reduced habitual categorization, when such a reduction was optimal. These effects were produced by a secularized meditation technique, which no theological or cultural overlay, to which naive subjects were randomly assigned. All the more interesting, the effects were produced after only 15 minutes of meditation. By contrast, the MBSR studies employed subjects who had practiced meditation for six to eight weeks.
In another study, this one employing MBSR, Anderson et al. (2007) tested a group of subjects with no prior experience with meditation, who completed a standard eight-week course in MBSR (a control group did not meditate). He then administered a number of measures of stress and mood, including the Positive and Negative Affect Scales, the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories, and other instruments. Examining post-test changes from a pre-test baseline, these investigators found that more subjects in the meditation group showed changes in the "beneficial" direction: more positive affect, less negative affect, less depression, and less anxiety. Anderson et al. also administered a number of cognitive tasks, including the standard and emotional versions of the Stroop interference task, an Object Decision Task, and a Continuous Performance Test of sustained attention and attentional switching, but found no effects of meditation.
On the other hand, a later study of MBSR by Moore and Malinowski (2009) compared a group who completed a six-week "beginner's course" in MBSR with a group of non-meditating controls on a number of tests of cognitive flexibility. They found small effects on Stroop performance, but no effects on the "D2" Concentration and Endurance Test, which provides multiple measures of attention.
It should be remembered, in passing, that meditation is not necessarily unique in this respect. Raz and his associates (e.g., 2002) found that a posthypnotic suggestion for agnosia or alexia, in which the stimulus words would appear as symbols in an unfamiliar foreign language, actually eliminated Stroop interference. Even eight weeks of meditation training didn't accomplish that. Of course, the subjects had to highly be hypnotizable, while the meditation studies employed samples that were arguably more representative of the population at large. But the Raz studies do show what can be accomplished in terms of de-automatization.
By asking whether automatization is reversible, meditation research gains considerable theoretical significance. Implicit in the standard concept of automaticity is the idea that automaticity, whether innate or achieved through extensive practice, is permanent. By contrast, meditation research seems to indicate that automatization can be reversed
The flame of the alpha-biofeedback movement sputtered and went out, but the popularity of TM and the Relaxation Response, not to mention the injection of Zen Buddhism into popular culture, has kept interest in meditation at a high level.And with the advent of more sophisticated technologies for brain imaging, we have begun to see a new wave of studies of brain activity during meditation -- with two differences:
Davidson, Kabat-Zinn, and their colleagues (2003) recruited the employees of a local biotechnology firm for an experiment in which some would be randomly assigned to receive training in Kabat-Zinn's "mindfulness-based stress reduction program", and others served as a wait-list control. The meditators were taught MBSR in classes that met for 2-1/2 to 3 hours, once a week, for eight weeks, including a 7-hour silent retreat during Week 6. They also practiced MBSR at home for 1 hour/day, 6 days/week, with the help of guided audiotapes. EEG data was collected at baseline and at the conclusion of the 8-week period, during which the subjects were asked to narrate positive and negative life experiences.
the power of
alpha activity in the EEG, these
investigators detected a significant
shift to the left cerebral
hemisphere in the meditation
group.This finding takes its
significance in the context of prior
research by Davidson and his
colleagues indicating that emotional
states differentially activate the
cerebral hemispheres. To make
a long story short:
So, on the basis of these results, it appears that mindfulness meditation increases left anterior brain activation, resulting in both increased positive affect and decreased negative affect. An article on this research in National Geographic (03/05) pointed to a Tibetan monk who, during meditation, showed an almost 100% shift of alpha power to his left hemisphere -- leading the magazine to dub him "quantfiably the happiest man in the world".
wonder there's been a resurgence of
interest in meditation. At the
same time, it is important to
remember the enthusiasm that greeted
the earliest reports, in the 1960s,
of Yoga, Zen, and alpha-wave
biofeedback, and approach these
preliminary findings with some
caution (those who do not remember
history are condemned to repeat it).
The big take-home
lesson, however, is that the
effects of meditation on
consciousness may differ depending
on the purpose for which the
Meditation for stress reduction
may not be the same as meditation
to achieve total
or communion with God. Yoga
and Zen were not designed to lower
people's blood pressure: they were
designed to raise people's
consciousness in an explicitly
religious context. And,
indeed, some neuroscientists see
themselves as validating Buddhism
empirically. See, for
example, Why Buddhism is True:
The Science and Philosophy of
Meditation and Enlightenment
(2017) by Robert Wright.
But these days, especially in America, Buddhist meditation, including the secularized "mindfulness" variant, is practiced mostly as what Owen Flanagan (in The Bodhisattvas's Brain: Buddhism Naturalized, 2011) has called "a kind of moral mental hygiene". Flanagan argues that it is possible to strip away the religious "hocus pocus" from Buddhism -- the polytheism of ghosts, protector deities, and evil spirits, karma, nirvana, etc. -- leaving the spiritual but nonreligious consumer with an empirically validated path to happiness. I wonder.
A lot depends, of course, on how you define religion, which is something that even scholars of religion find difficult to do (if you don't believe me, take Religious Studies 101 and watch the professor try to do it).
Then again, it might be possible to have what Ronald Dworkin, the philosopher, has called a "religion without gods" (see his posthumously published Religion Without God, 2013). Many people characterize themselves as "spiritual" or even "religious", even though they don't identify with any particular religious tradition, or even believe in God. And the Supreme Court has determined that the "free exercise" of religion enshrined in the Constitution includes "religions" that do not recognize a god of any sort, such as secular humanism. While some might prefer to reserve the term "religion" for theistic beliefs that entail the recognition of a God or gods, Dworkin argues that, in fact, religion does not necessarily entail the belief that the universe is governed by some supernatural being -- much less one that acts in history and communicates directly with believers. Albert Einstein, for example, was an atheist. But he also described himself as "devoutly religious" (in an essay reprinted in Living Philosophies, edited by Clifton Fadiman, 1990). Dworkin argues (in Chapter 1, reprinted in the New York Review of Books, 04/04/2013) that the "metaphysical core" of this "religious attitude" consists of two values:
- "[H]uman life has objective meaning or importance. Each person has an innate and inescapable responsibility to try to make his life a successful one: that means living well, accepting ethical responsibilities to oneself as well as moral responsibilities to others, not just if we happen to think this is important but because it is in itself important whether we think so or not.
- [W]hat we call "nature" -- the universe as a whole and in all its parts -- is not just a matter of fact but is itself sublime: something of intrinsic value and wonder.
Together these two comprehensive value judgments declare inherent value in both dimensions of human life: biological and biographical. We are a part of nature because we have a physical being and duration: nature is the locus and nutrient of our lives. We are apart from nature because we are conscious of ourselves [emphasis added] as making a life and must make decisions that, taken together, determine what life we have made.
So in addition to being secularized
and commodified, meditation has been
scientized -- in the words of
Adam Gopnik, reviewing a spate of
new books on Buddhism in America,
including Robin Wright's book Why
Buddhism is True (2017) and
Stephen Batchelor's After
Buddhism (2015). Not
only has meditation been studied
scientifically, but meditation is
also interpreted as affirming basic
principles of psychology and
neuroscience -- such as the
modularity of the mind -- resulting
in an argument that science and
Buddhism, at least, are
compatible. But this
compatibility arises only by
discarding the supernatural
doctrines of Buddhism, such as the
ideas of karma and
reincarnation. He writes ("American
A deeper objection to the attempted reconciliation of contemporary science and Buddhist practice flows from the nature of scientific storytelling.... The contemporary generation of American Buddhists draws again and again on scientific evidence for the power of meditation -- EEGs and MRIs and so on -- without ever wondering why a scientific explanation of that kind has seldom arisen in Buddhist cultures.... What Wright correctly sees as the heart of meditation practice -- the draining away of the stories we tell compulsively about each moment in favor of simply having the moment -- is antithetical to the kind of evidentiary argument he admires. Science is competitive storytelling. If a Buddhist Newton had been sitting under that tree, he would If a Buddhist Newton had been sitting under that tree, he would have seen the apple falling and, reaching for Enlightenment, experienced each moment of its descent as a thing pure in itself. Only a restless Western Newton would say, �Now, what story can tell us best what connects those apple-moments from branch to ground? Sprites? Magnets? The mysterious force of the mass of the earth beneath it? What made the damn thing fall?� That�s a story we tell, not a moment we experience. The Buddhist Newton might have been happier than ours -- ours was plenty unhappy -- but he would never have found the equation. Science is putting names on things and telling stories about them, the very habits that Buddhists urge us to transcend. The stories improve over time in the light of evidence, or they don�t. It�s just as possible to have Buddhist science as to have Christian science or Taoist science. But the meditator�s project of being here now will never be the same as the scientist�s project of connecting the past to the future, of telling how and knowing why [i.e., classifying, explaining, and predicting].
Both Wright and Batchelor end with a semi-evangelical call for a secularized, modernized Buddhism that can supply all the shared serenity of the old dispensation and still adjust to the modern world -- Batchelor actually ends his book with a sequence of fixed tenets for a secular Gotama practice. But does their Buddhism have a unique content, or is it simply the basics of secular liberalism with a borrowed Eastern vocabulary? What is the specifically Buddhist valence of saying, as Batchelor does, that the practitioners of a secular Buddhism will �seek to understand and diminish the structural violence of societies and institutions as well as the roots of violence that are present in themselves�? Do we need a twenty-five-hundred-year-old faith from the East to do this -- isn�t that what every liberal-arts college insists that its students do, anyway, with the help of only a cultural-studies major?
All secularized faiths tend to converge on a set of agreeable values: compassion, empathy, the renunciation of mere material riches. But the shared values seem implicit in the very project of secularizing a faith, with its assumption that the ethical and the supernatural elements can be cleanly severed�an operation that would have seemed unintelligible to St. Paul, as to Gotama himself. The idea of doing without belief is perhaps a bigger idea than any belief it negates. Secular Buddhism ends up being . . . secularism....
A faith practice with an authoritarian structure sooner or later becomes a horror; a faith practice without an authoritarian structure sooner or later becomes a hobby. The dwindling down of Buddhism into another life-style choice will doubtless irritate many, and Wright will likely be sneered at for reducing Buddhism to another bourgeois amenity, like yoga or green juice. (Batchelor refers to this as a �dumbing down of the dharma.�)....
If there is something distinctive about a Buddhist secularism, it is that the Buddhist believes in the annihilation of appetite, while the pure secular humanist believes in satisfying our appetites until annihilation makes it impossible. Appetite, though, has a way of renewing itself even after it�s been fed; no matter what we do, some new gnawing materializes. Dissatisfaction with our circumstances, the frustration of our ambitions, something no bigger than a failure to lose enough weight or to have an extra room to make a nursery out of: even amid luxury, the ache of the unachieved seems intense enough. It is these dissatisfactions that drive so many Americans�who cannot understand why lives filled with material pleasure still feel unfulfilled -- to their meditation mats.Secularized or traditional, the central Buddhist epiphany remains essential: the fact of mortality makes loss certain. For all the ways in which science and its blessed godchild scientific medicine have reduced the overt suffering that a human life entails, the vector to sadness remains in place, as much as it did in the Buddha�s time. Gotama�s death, from what one doctor describes as mesenteric infarction, seems needlessly painful and gruesome by modern standards; this is the kind of suffering we can substantially alleviate. But the universal mortality of all beings�the fact that, if we�re lucky, we will die after seventy years or so�is not reformable. The larger problem we face is not suffering but sadness, and the sadness is caused by the fact of loss. To love less in order to lose less seems like no solution at all, but to see loss squarely sounds like wisdom. We may or may not be able to Americanize our Buddhism, but we can certainly ecumenicize our analgesics. Lots of different stuff from lots of different places which we drink and think and do can help us manage. Every faith practice has a different form of comfort to offer in the face of loss, and each is useful. Sometimes it helps to dwell on the immensity of the universe. Sometimes it helps to feel the presence of ongoing family and community. Sometimes it helps to light a candle and say a prayer. Sometimes it helps to sit and breathe.
This page last revised 07/11/2018.